PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

National Court of Papua New Guinea
You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> National Court of Papua New Guinea >> 2023 >> [2023] PGNC 325

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

Mofu v Kumbia [2023] PGNC 325; N10485 (2 October 2023)

N10485

PAPUA NEW GUINEA
[IN THE NATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]


WS (HR) NO 12 OF 2011


SOLOMON MOFU FOR HIMSELF AND 82 OTHER WEST PAPUAN REFUGEES NAMED IN THE SCHEDULE TO THE WRIT
Plaintiffs


V


CONSTABLE ANDREW KUMBIA
First Defendant


JOSEPH TONDOP, METROPOLITAN SUPERINTENDENT, NCD
Second Defendant


TOM KULUNGA, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
Third Defendant


THE INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA
Fourth Defendant


Waigani: Cannings J
2023: 31st July, 5th September, 2nd October


DAMAGES – breach of human rights – destruction of houses and property by police at settlement during eviction exercise – assessment of damages after trial on liability.


The plaintiffs, settlers on Government land, succeeded at a trial in establishing a cause of action in breaches of human rights committed against them by members of the Police Force during an eviction exercise. Judgment was entered against the member of the Police Force who led the squad that entered the settlement and destroyed houses and other structures and properties including trees and food gardens, on land which had been the plaintiffs’ home for 28 years. A separate trial was conducted on assessment of damages. The 83 plaintiffs who gave evidence claimed three categories of damages: (a) special damages in respect of property destroyed or damaged, K3,306,823.90; (b damages for breaches of human rights, K830,000.00; (c) exemplary damages, K830,000.00. The total amount of damages sought was K4,966,823.90. As to an award of interest on damages under the Judicial Proceedings (Interest on Debts and Damages) Act 2015, the parties agreed that the appropriate rate was 2% but disagreed as to the date that calculation of interest should start to run. The plaintiffs argued it should be the date on which the causes of action accrued, 1 December 2010. The defendants argued it should be the date on which the writ of summons was filed, 16 November 2011.


Held:


(1) The defendants’ argument that the plaintiffs were only entitled to damages specifically awarded in respect of breaches of human rights was misconceived and involved a misconstruction of the order on liability. The order identified the causes of action pleaded and proven by the plaintiffs (four discrete breaches of human rights), and identified who was liable (the first and fourth defendants) and identified the remedy granted to the plaintiffs (damages). Damages is a general remedy capable of being categorized in many ways and it was open to the plaintiffs to separately plead, as they did in their amended statement of claim, for special damages, damages for breaches of human rights and exemplary damages. They were entitled to an award of damages for each of those categories.

(2) Though there were deficiencies in the plaintiffs’ evidence, damages were awarded to each plaintiff who gave evidence in the following amounts: (a) special damages in respect of property destroyed or damaged, K461,364.86; (b) damages for breaches of human rights, K415,000.00; (c) exemplary damages, K415,000.00. Total damages awarded was K1,291,364.86.

(3) In addition, each plaintiff was awarded interest on the amount of damages awarded to them, at the rate of 2% per annum, for the period from the date of filing the writ, 16 November 2011, to the date of judgment on assessment of damages, a period of 11.87 years, a total of K302,954.20. The total judgment sum was K1,594,319.06

Cases Cited


The following cases are cited in the judgment:


Albert Baine v The State (1995) N1335
Alphonse Willie v Simon Kaupa (2016) N6553
Anuta Jobou v Alfred Kumasi and The State (2012) N4607
Eton Pakui v The State (2006) N2977
Francis Fuliva v Inspector Tony Wagambie Junior [2013] 1 PNGLR 142
Jacinta Albert v Joseph Aine (2019) N7772
Joe Tipaiza v James Yali (2008) N3472
Jonathan Mangope Paraia v The State (1995) N1343
Kolaip Palapi v Sergeant Poko (2001) N2274
Livingston v Raywards Coal Co [1880] 5 App Cases 25
Michael Jacob v Jim Namora & The State (2020) N8385
Mofu v Kumbia & The State (2023) N10094
Peter Wanis v Fred Sikiot and The State (1995) N1350
Stanley Baine v Arnold Ulga & The State (2019) N8076
Thompson Munvi v Arnold Ulka Takai & The State (2018) N7100


Counsel


T Yai, for the Plaintiffs
P T Ohuma, for the Defendants


2nd October 2023


1. CANNINGS J: This is an assessment of damages following a trial on liability. The first defendant (a member of the Police Force) and the fourth defendant (the State) were found liable for human rights breaches committed against the plaintiffs during an eviction exercise conducted by police on 29 November 2010.


2. The 83 plaintiffs who gave evidence are of West Papua origin who fled their traditional homes in West Papua province of Indonesia in 1982 and settled on customary land in the Nine Mile area of the National Capital District. They established a settlement, which they called Waikiki and it became home to more than 800 people. In the 1990s the land was converted to government land. State Leases were issued for portions 2152 and 2153. The registered proprietor was the then member for Maprik in the National Parliament, Sir Pita Lus.


3. In the years 2009 and 2010, various court proceedings regarding the land resulted in orders that required some of the occupiers to vacate it and, if they did not comply, authorising the Police and authorised agents to take possession of it.


4. On 29 November 2010 the police entered the land and assisted persons engaged by the registered proprietor (the owner of the land) in conducting an eviction exercise over three days ending on 1 December 2010. It involved forced ejectment of the plaintiffs and destruction of houses and other structures and properties including trees and food gardens to make way for development of the land.


5. The plaintiffs originally commenced proceedings in the National Court against the registered proprietor, the member of the Police Force alleged to oversee the police squad involved in the exercise, the Metropolitan Superintendent, the Commissioner of Police and the State. Later, with the leave of the Court, the registered proprietor was removed as a defendant and the proceedings continued against the others.


6. The case took a very long time to get to trial. The reasons for the delay are unclear. Neither side made an issue of it, so the case has been dealt with on its merits.


7. The plaintiffs sought damages and orders that would require the defendants to provide for their resettlement. Various causes of action were pleaded: the torts of assault, negligence and trespass, and breaches of human rights under Constitution, ss 36 (freedom from inhuman treatment), 37 (protection of the law), 41 (proscribed acts), 42 (liberty of the person), 44 (arbitrary search and entry), 49 (right to privacy) and 53 (unjust deprivation of property). The resettlement orders were sought on the basis that the plaintiffs are refugees and the fourth defendant, the State, is responsible under various international treaties for their well-being and welfare.


8. At the trial on liability the defendants argued that the eviction exercise was conducted in accordance with orders of the National Court by persons engaged by the registered proprietor, and the police played a limited role. That argument was rejected (Mofu v Kumbia & The State (2023) N10094). Judgment was entered in favour of the plaintiffs in the following terms:


(1) Liability has been established by all plaintiffs, for damages, against the first and fourth defendants in breach of human rights under Constitution, ss 37 (protection of the law), 41 (proscribed acts), 44 (freedom from arbitrary search and entry) and 53 (protection from unjust deprivation of property), as pleaded in the amended writ of summons and statement of claim filed 19 May 2021.

(2) Other claims against the first and fourth defendants are dismissed.

(3) The proceedings against the second and third defendants are dismissed.

(4) There shall be a trial on assessment of damages in relation to the liability established against the first and fourth defendants.

COMPETING ARGUMENTS


9. The plaintiffs claim three categories of damages:


(a) special damages in respect of property destroyed or damaged, K3,306,823.90;

(b) damages for breaches of human rights, K830,000.00;

(c) exemplary damages, K830,000.00.

The total amount of damages claimed is K4,966,823.90.


10. The defendants argue that the order on liability only awarded damages for breach of human rights, not special damages or exemplary damages. In respect of breaches of human rights, each plaintiff should be awarded no more than K1,500.00, so the total award of damages should not exceed K124,500.00.


11. As to an award of interest on damages under the Judicial Proceedings (Interest on Debts and Damages) Act 2015, the parties agree that the appropriate rate is 2% but disagree as to the date that calculation of interest should start to run. The plaintiffs argue it should be the date on which the causes of action accrued, 1 December 2010. The defendants argued it should be the date on which the writ of summons was filed, 16 November 2011.


EVIDENCE


12. The plaintiffs’ case consisted of affidavits sworn by 83 plaintiffs, deposing to what the police had done and the property damage the deponent had incurred and/or witnessed. There was no evidence for the defendants.


GENERAL PRINCIPLES FOR ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES


13. In assessing damages I have had regard to the following principles:


APPROACH TO ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES
14. I will assess damages in the three categories of damages pleaded in the amended statement of claim.


(a) Special damages for property losses


15. Each of the 83 plaintiffs gave evidence of the police destroying or seriously damaging their homes and other properties. They each made a claim for a specific Kina amount, and the amounts claimed in their affidavits are reflected in submissions. Mr Yai for the plaintiffs submitted that each claim is supported by a valuation report prepared in 2010, just before the eviction exercise took place, by a registered valuer, Alfred Nirigut, of Tabernacle Valuers, which is annexed to the affidavit of Solomon Mofu filed 8 July 2013 (exhibit P1), and that the amounts given in the plaintiffs’ evidence should be accepted. But if those amounts are not entirely accepted there should be a discount of no more than 50% applied to each claim. The total of the amounts claimed by each plaintiff is K2,306,824.30.


16. Mr Yai submits that an additional amount of K1,000,000.00 should be awarded in respect of “land development cost”, which includes access roads, drainage and excavation and services such as water, power and sewerage, the details of which are in the affidavits of Solomon Mofu (exhibit P1) and Martin Kambu (exhibit P2).


17. Ms Ohuma for the defendants submitted that nothing should be awarded as the order on liability only awarded damages for breach of human rights. Nothing was awarded for property losses.


18. I reject that argument. It misconstrues the order on liability. The order identified the causes of action pleaded and proven by the plaintiffs (four discrete breaches of human rights), and identified who was liable (the first and fourth defendants) and identified the remedy granted to the plaintiffs (damages). Damages is a general remedy capable of being categorized in many ways and it was open to the plaintiffs to plead, as they did in their further amended statement of claim, separately for special damages, damages for breaches of human rights and exemplary damages. They are entitled to an award of damages for each of those categories.


19. However, I am not obliged to award the plaintiffs what they ask for. The amounts claimed appear to me to be exaggerated. The valuation report said to support each claim was not in evidence as a separate exhibit and the valuer who prepared it did not give evidence. It has limited probative value.


20. However, it is clear that the incident happened as alleged and lot of homes and other properties were damaged and destroyed. The plaintiffs have a right to be compensated for their property losses.


21. I have had regard to the approach I have taken in several other cases of multiple plaintiffs in police raid or eviction exercise cases. I have invariably discounted each claim by a certain percentage to arrive at reasonable and realistic sums. For example:


22. The only cases in which I applied a discount of 50% were Tipaiza and Jobou. In the other cases I applied a discount of 90%. I think the claims in this case are not as exaggerated as those in most of the above cases. I have decided that a discount of 80% will apply.


23. This is a fair and realistic approach when the evidence is deficient. The result is shown in table 1. Column 1 is the number ascribed to the plaintiff according to the numbering in Mr Yai’s submission. Column 2 is the plaintiff’s name. Column 3 is the amount claimed by the plaintiff for property losses. Column 4 is the figure in column 3 multiplied by 20% (representing the discounting of the total claim for property losses by 80%). It is the figure in column 4 that is the amount awarded to the plaintiff for property losses.


24. As for the additional K1 million claimed for land development cost, I entirely reject this claim. I note that it is included in the further amended statement of claim filed on 7 March 2023 but I think it is far too vague a claim, which is inadequately particularised and not proven. I will only award special damages for property losses at the rate of 20% of the amount claimed in each plaintiff's affidavit, as shown in table 1. The plaintiffs are awarded a total of K461,364.86.


TABLE 1: AWARD OF SPECIAL DAMAGES FOR PROPERTY LOSSES


No
Plaintiff’s name
Property losses claimed (K)
Property losses awarded (K)
1
Solomon Mofu
33,690.60
6,738.12
2
Martin Kambu
70,814.00
14,162.80
3
Jonah Reuben
70,293.00
14,058.60
4
Mecky Tomkau
23,719.00
4,743.80
5
John Flassy
18,110.00
3,622.00
6
Sonia Bimel
32,154.00
6,430.80
7
Ali Gora
46,845.00
9,369.00
8
Benny Wafumelena
32,019.90
6,403.98
9
Andrias Norotou
30,458.00
6,091.60
10
Adolph Fonataba
16,212.00
3,242.40
11
Bas Fairio
42,270.00
8,454.00
12
Christ Arampayai
20,702.60
4,140.52
13
Ipu K
16,540.00
3,308.00
14
Dorothy Omae
16,920.00
3,384.00
15
Daniel Aure
34,713.20
6,942.64
16
Esther Jeffery
19,352.00
3,870.40
17
Bernard Apini
16,492.00
3,298.40
18
Ezekiel Mugi
19,158.00
3,831.60
19
Hengky Bouway
17,820.00
3,564.00
20
Godfrey Mager
20,942.00
4,188.40
21
Gustav Dusay
38,337.00
7,667.40
22
Chris Arompiay
28,219.00
5,643.80
23
Charlie Rumbiak
18,908.00
3,781.60
24
Cathy Timbun
21,808.00
4,361.60
25
Alphonse Sonny
17,359.00
3,471.80
26
Dosia Tao
16,931.00
3,386.20
27
Charley Bonny
25,034.00
5,006.80
28
Benny Aiyong
31,187.00
6,237.40
29
Awal Baundo
34,945.00
6,989.00
30
Absalom Haay
32,532.00
6,506.40
31
Allan Larry
13,530.00
2,706.00
32
John Fonahaba
23,669.00
4,733.80
33
Jobbi Kauke
20,399.00
4,079.80
34
John Seseray
22,656.00
4,531.20
35
John Ogowa
33,789.00
6,757.80
36
Jacob Otto
19,583.00
3,916.60
37
Joseph Ove
45,417.00
9,083.40
38
Otto Kuike
31,460.50
6,292.10
39
Paul Hembrim
44,900.00
8,980.00
40
Kenny Abau
19,417.00
3,883.40
41
Paul Sare
19,155.00
3,831.00
42
Patrick Herome
24,157.00
4,831.40
43
Ori Hou Kauvu
36,330.00
7,266.00
44
Panus Boway
18,474.00
3,694.80
45
Paul Nakos
19,209.00
3,841.80
46
Paul Dua
24,174.30
4,834.86
47
Lyn Israel
21,514.10
4,302.82
48
Makiki Serah
19,914.00
3,982.80
49
Martin Ingamier
20,280.00
4,056.00
50
Nancy Ben
24,451.80
4,890.36
51
Micks Gapa
25,194.00
5,038.80
52
Maria Nelson
19,020.00
3,804.00
53
Nimai Derev
25,985.90
5,197.18
54
Kapara Kumbuima
19,930.00
3,986.00
55
Kamape Jeff
20,538.00
4,107.60
56
Nelson Bulda
30,839.50
6,167.90
57
Pastor Basfario
44,160.00
8,832.00
58
Kambu Otto
36,810.50
7,362.10
59
Josephine Topa
61,410.80
12,282.16
60
Julian Bisay
26,450.00
5,290.00
61
Mark Nokae
56,565.00
11,313.00
62
Mecky Wasiery
30,282.00
6,056.40
63
Martin Owen
17,285.00
3,457.00
64
Marshall T
21,030.00
4,206.00
65
Mathias Koima
11,755.00
2,351.00
66
Mama Rumbiak
19,917.00
3,983.40
67
Max Riaba
30,817.40
6,163.48
68
Mote Elomi
16,207.00
3,241.40
69
Mathias Godfrey
24,340.00
4,868.00
70
Monda Kamame
19,266.00
3,853.20
71
Moses Mitna
76,277.00
15,255.40
72
Niakili Seva
19,020.00
3,804.00
73
Ponny Wafumelena
33,277.00
6,655.40
74
Sause Wura
18,844.00
3,768.80
75
Ruben Kebri
16,400.00
3,280.00
76
Rose Kamane
20,566.00
4,113.20
77
Yaldua Kimbiyal
19,294.00
3,858.80
78
William Brabar
39,965.00
7,993.00
79
Tonny Vatabu
44,611.00
8,922.20
80
Tommy Imbirir
37,627.20
7,525.44
81
Tinus Wally
23,135.00
4,627.00
82
Steven Lila
11,387.00
2,277.40
83
Zina Rumbiak
21,653.00
4,330.60


Total
2,306,824.30
461,364.86

(b) Damages for breach of human rights

25. Mr Yai submitted that each plaintiff who gave evidence should be awarded K10,000.00 damages for their human rights proven at the trial on liability to have been breached, ie breaches of ss 37, 41, 44 and 53 of the Constitution, a total of K830,000.00.


26. Ms Ohuma submitted that each plaintiff should be awarded K1,500.00.


27. I award a compromise amount, being the same amount I awarded each of the 100 plaintiffs in Nick Betanjo v Fred Yakasa & The State (2020) N8419: K5,000.00. The total is K415,000.00.


(c) Exemplary damages

28. Mr Yai submitted that each plaintiff who has given evidence should be awarded K10,000.00 exemplary damages.


29. Ms Ohuma submitted nothing should be awarded.


30. I have already rejected the premise on which Ms Ohuma’s argument is based, so the submission that nothing should be awarded is rejected.


31. I apply s 58(2) (compensation) of the Constitution, which states:


A person whose rights or freedoms declared or protected by this Division are infringed (including any infringement caused by a derogation of the restrictions specified in Part X.5 (internment)) on the use of emergency powers in relation to internment is entitled to reasonable damages and, if the court thinks it proper, exemplary damages in respect of the infringement.


32. I also apply s 12 (judgments against the State) of the Claims By and Against the State Act, which states:


No exemplary damages may be awarded against the State unless it appears to the court that, regardless of the nature of the claim, there has been a breach of Constitutional rights so severe or continuous as to warrant an award of exemplary damages.


33. I consider that it is proper that each plaintiff be awarded exemplary damages. It appears to me that there has been a breach of constitutional rights so severe as to warrant an award of exemplary damages. The amount of exemplary damages that I think is proper and warranted in this case is the same amount I awarded each of the 100 plaintiffs in Nick Betanjo v Fred Yakasa & The State (2020) N8419: K5,000.00. The total is K415,000.00.


SUMMARY


34. The plaintiffs are awarded the following amounts:


(a) special damages for property losses, K461,364.86;


(b) damages for breaches of human rights, K415,000.00;


(c) exemplary damages, K415,000.00.


Total = K1,291,364.86.


The total award of damages to each plaintiff is shown in table 2.


INTEREST


35. As to an award of interest on damages under the Judicial Proceedings (Interest on Debts and Damages) Act 2015, the parties agreed that the appropriate rate was 2% but disagreed as to the date that calculation of interest should start to run. The plaintiffs argued it should be the date on which the causes of action accrued, 1 December 2010. The defendants argued it should be the date on which the writ of summons was filed, 16 November 2011.


36. I uphold the defendants’ argument. I will exercise the discretion of the Court to fix the start date as 16 November 2011. The end date will be the date of this judgment. The period is 11.73 years. Interest will be awarded by applying the formula D x I x N = A, where D is the amount of damages, I is the interest rate per annum, N is the period in years, A is the amount of interest. Interest has been calculated by multiplying each award of damages by a factor of 0.2346 (0.02 x 11.73), as shown in table 2.


TABLE 2: TOTAL AWARD OF DAMAGES + INTEREST

No
Plaintiff’s name
Special damages for property losses
(K)
Breach of human rights
(K)
Exemplary
damages
(K)
Total damages
(K)
Interest
(K)
Total damages + interest
(K)
1
Solomon Mofu
6,738.12
5,000.00
5,000.00
16,738.12
3,926.76
20,664.88
2
Martin Kambu
14,162.80
5,000.00
5,000.00
24,162.80
5,668.59
29,831.39
3
Jonah Reuben
14,058.60
5,000.00
5,000.00
24,058.60
5,644.15
29,702.75
4
Mecky Tomkau
4,743.80
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,743.80
3,458.90
18,202.70
5
John Flassy
3,622.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,622.00
3,195.72
16,817.72
6
Sonia Bimel
6,430.80
5,000.00
5,000.00
16,430.80
3,854.67
20,285.47
7
Ali Gora
9,369.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
19,369.00
4,543.97
23,912.97
8
Benny Wafumelena
6,403.98
5,000.00
5,000.00
16,403.98
3,848.37
20,252.35
9
Andrias Norotou
6,091.60
5,000.00
5,000.00
16,091.60
3,775.09
19,866.69
10
Adolph Fonataba
3,242.40
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,242.40
3,106.67
16,349.07
11
Bas Fairio
8,454.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
18,454.00
4,329.31
22,783.31
12
Christ Arampayai
4,140.52
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,140.52
3,317.37
17,457.89
13
Ipu K
3,308.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,308.00
3,122.06
16,430.06
14
Dorothy Omae
3,384.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,384.00
3,139.89
16,523.89
15
Daniel Aure
6,942.64
5,000.00
5,000.00
16,942.64
3,974.74
20,917.38
16
Esther Jeffery
3,870.40
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,870.40
3,254.00
17,124.40
17
Bernard Apini
3,298.40
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,298.40
3,119.80
16,418.20
18
Ezekiel Mugi
3,831.60
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,831.60
3,244.89
17,076.49
19
Hengky Bouway
3,564.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,564.00
3,182.11
16,746.11
20
Godfrey Mager
4,188.40
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,188.40
3,328.60
17,517.00
21
Gustav Dusay
7,667.40
5,000.00
5,000.00
17,667.40
4,144.77
21,812.17
22
Chris Arompiay
5,643.80
5,000.00
5,000.00
15,643.80
3,670.04
19,313.84
23
Charlie Rumbiak
3,781.60
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,781.60
3,233.16
17,014.76
24
Cathy Timbun
4,361.60
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,361.60
3,369.23
17,730.83
25
Alphonse Sonny
3,471.80
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,471.80
3,160.48
16,632.28
26
Dosia Tao
3,386.20
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,386.20
3,140.40
16,526.60
27
Charley Bonny
5,006.80
5,000.00
5,000.00
15,006.80
3,520.60
18,527.40
28
Benny Aiyong
6,237.40
5,000.00
5,000.00
16,237.40
3,809.29
20,046.69
29
Awal Baundo
6,989.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
16,989.00
3,985.62
20,974.62
30
Absalom Haay
6,506.40
5,000.00
5,000.00
16,506.40
3,872.40
20,378.80
31
Allan Larry
2,706.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
12,706.00
2,980.83
15,686.83
32
John Fonahaba
4,733.80
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,733.80
3,456.55
18,190.35
33
Jobbi Kauke
4,079.80
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,079.80
3,303.12
17,382.92
34
John Seseray
4,531.20
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,531.20
3,409.02
17,940.22
35
John Ogowa
6,757.80
5,000.00
5,000.00
16,757.80
3,931.38
20,689.18
36
Jacob Otto
3,916.60
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,916.60
3,264.83
17,181.43
37
Joseph Ove
9,083.40
5,000.00
5,000.00
19,083.40
4,476.97
23,560.37
38
Otto Kuike
6,292.10
5,000.00
5,000.00
16,292.10
3,822.13
20,114.23
39
Paul Hembrim
8,980.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
18,980.00
4,452.71
23,432.71
40
Kenny Abau
3,883.40
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,883.40
3,257.05
17,140.45
41
Paul Sare
3,831.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,831.00
3,244.75
17,075.75
42
Patrick Herome
4,831.40
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,831.40
3,479.45
18,310.85
43
Ori Hou Kauvu
7,266.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
17,266.00
4,050.60
21,316.60
44
Panus Boway
3,694.80
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,694.80
3,212.80
16,907.60
45
Paul Nakos
3,841.80
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,841.80
3,247.29
17,089.09
46
Paul Dua
4,834.86
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,834.86
3,480.26
18,315.12
47
Lyn Israel
4,302.82
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,302.82
3,355.44
17,658.26
48
Makiki Serah
3,982.80
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,982.80
3,280.36
17,263.16
49
Martin Ingamier
4,056.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,056.00
3,297.54
17,353.54
50
Nancy Ben
4,890.36
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,890.36
3,493.28
18,383.64
51
Micks Gapa
5,038.80
5,000.00
5,000.00
15,038.80
3,528.10
18,566.90
52
Maria Nelson
3,804.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,804.00
3,238.42
17,042.42
53
Nimai Derev
5,197.18
5,000.00
5,000.00
15,197.18
3,565.26
18,762.44
54
Kapara Kumbuima
3,986.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,986.00
3,281.12
17,267.12
55
Kamape Jeff
4,107.60
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,107.60
3,309.64
17,417.24
56
Nelson Bulda
6,167.90
5,000.00
5,000.00
16,167.90
3,792.99
19,960.89
57
Pastor Basfario
8,832.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
18,832.00
4,417.99
23,249.99
58
Kambu Otto
7,362.10
5,000.00
5,000.00
17,362.10
4,073.15
21,435.25
59
Josephine Topa
12,282.16
5,000.00
5,000.00
22,282.16
5,227.39
27,509.55
60
Julian Bisay
5,290.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
15,290.00
3,587.03
18,877.03
61
Mark Nokae
11,313.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
21,313.00
5,000.03
26,313.03
62
Mecky Wasiery
6,056.40
5,000.00
5,000.00
16,056.40
3,766.83
19,823.23
63
Martin Owen
3,457.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,457.00
3,157.01
16,614.01
64
Marshall T
4,206.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,206.00
3,332.73
17,538.73
65
Mathias Koima
2,351.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
12,351.00
2,897.54
15,248.54
66
Mama Rumbiak
3,983.40
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,983.40
3,280.51
17,263.91
67
Max Riaba
6,163.48
5,000.00
5,000.00
16,163.48
3,791.95
19,955.43
68
Mote Elomi
3,241.40
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,241.40
3,106.43
16,347.83
69
Mathias Godfrey
4,868.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,868.00
3,488.03
18,356.03
70
Monda Kamame
3,853.20
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,853.20
3,249.96
17,103.16
71
Moses Mitna
15,255.40
5,000.00
5,000.00
25,255.40
5,924.92
31,180.32
72
Niakili Seva
3,804.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,804.00
3,238.42
17,042.42
73
Ponny Wafumelena
6,655.40
5,000.00
5,000.00
16,655.40
3,907.36
20,562.76
74
Sause Wura
3,768.80
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,768.80
3,230.16
16,998.96
75
Ruben Kebri
3,280.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,280.00
3,115.49
16,395.49
76
Rose Kamane
4,113.20
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,113.20
3,310.96
17,424.16
77
Yaldua Kimbiyal
3,858.80
5,000.00
5,000.00
13,858.80
3,251.27
17,110.07
78
William Brabar
7,993.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
17,993.00
4,221.16
22,214.16
79
Tonny Vatabu
8,922.20
5,000.00
5,000.00
18,922.20
4,439.15
23,361.35
80
Tommy Imbirir
7,525.44
5,000.00
5,000.00
17,525.44
4,111.47
21,636.91
81
Tinus Wally
4,627.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,627.00
3,431.49
18,058.49
82
Steven Lila
2,277.40
5,000.00
5,000.00
12,277.40
2,880.28
15,157.68
83
Zina Rumbiak
4,330.60
5,000.00
5,000.00
14,330.60
3,361.96
17,692.56

Total
461,364.86
415,000.00
415,000.00
1,291,364.86
302,954.20
1,594,319.06

COSTS


37. The general rule is that costs follow the event, ie the successful party has its costs paid for by the losing party on a party-to-party basis unless the circumstances of the case justify the exercise of discretion in some other way. I do not see any such circumstances here. Costs will follow the event


ORDER


  1. Damages are payable by the first and fourth defendants to each plaintiff whose name appears in the schedule, in the amount shown for each plaintiff.
  2. In addition, interest is payable by the first and fourth defendants to each plaintiff whose name appears in the schedule, in the amount shown for each plaintiff.
  3. The first and fourth defendants shall pay the plaintiffs’ costs of the entire proceedings on a party-party basis, which shall, if not agreed, be taxed.
  4. The proceedings are thereby determined and the file is closed.

SCHEDULE


No
Plaintiff’s name
Total damages (K)
Interest (K)
Total damages + interest (K)
1
Solomon Mofu
16,738.12
3,926.76
20,664.88
2
Martin Kambu
24,162.80
5,668.59
29,831.39
3
Jonah Reuben
24,058.60
5,644.15
29,702.75
4
Mecky Tomkau
14,743.80
3,458.90
18,202.70
5
John Flassy
13,622.00
3,195.72
16,817.72
6
Sonia Bimel
16,430.80
3,854.67
20,285.47
7
Ali Gora
19,369.00
4,543.97
23,912.97
8
Benny Wafumelena
16,403.98
3,848.37
20,252.35
9
Andrias Norotou
16,091.60
3,775.09
19,866.69
10
Adolph Fonataba
13,242.40
3,106.67
16,349.07
11
Bas Fairio
18,454.00
4,329.31
22,783.31
12
Christ Arampayai
14,140.52
3,317.37
17,457.89
13
Ipu K
13,308.00
3,122.06
16,430.06
14
Dorothy Omae
13,384.00
3,139.89
16,523.89
15
Daniel Aure
16,942.64
3,974.74
20,917.38
16
Esther Jeffery
13,870.40
3,254.00
17,124.40
17
Bernard Apini
13,298.40
3,119.80
16,418.20
18
Ezekiel Mugi
13,831.60
3,244.89
17,076.49
19
Hengky Bouway
13,564.00
3,182.11
16,746.11
20
Godfrey Mager
14,188.40
3,328.60
17,517.00
21
Gustav Dusay
17,667.40
4,144.77
21,812.17
22
Chris Arompiay
15,643.80
3,670.04
19,313.84
23
Charlie Rumbiak
13,781.60
3,233.16
17,014.76
24
Cathy Timbun
14,361.60
3,369.23
17,730.83
25
Alphonse Sonny
13,471.80
3,160.48
16,632.28
26
Dosia Tao
13,386.20
3,140.40
16,526.60
27
Charley Bonny
15,006.80
3,520.60
18,527.40
28
Benny Aiyong
16,237.40
3,809.29
20,046.69
29
Awal Baundo
16,989.00
3,985.62
20,974.62
30
Absalom Haay
16,506.40
3,872.40
20,378.80
31
Allan Larry
12,706.00
2,980.83
15,686.83
32
John Fonahaba
14,733.80
3,456.55
18,190.35
33
Jobbi Kauke
14,079.80
3,303.12
17,382.92
34
John Seseray
14,531.20
3,409.02
17,940.22
35
John Ogowa
16,757.80
3,931.38
20,689.18
36
Jacob Otto
13,916.60
3,264.83
17,181.43
37
Joseph Ove
19,083.40
4,476.97
23,560.37
38
Otto Kuike
16,292.10
3,822.13
20,114.23
39
Paul Hembrim
18,980.00
4,452.71
23,432.71
40
Kenny Abau
13,883.40
3,257.05
17,140.45
41
Paul Sare
13,831.00
3,244.75
17,075.75
42
Patrick Herome
14,831.40
3,479.45
18,310.85
43
Ori Hou Kauvu
17,266.00
4,050.60
21,316.60
44
Panus Boway
13,694.80
3,212.80
16,907.60
45
Paul Nakos
13,841.80
3,247.29
17,089.09
46
Paul Dua
14,834.86
3,480.26
18,315.12
47
Lyn Israel
14,302.82
3,355.44
17,658.26
48
Makiki Serah
13,982.80
3,280.36
17,263.16
49
Martin Ingamier
14,056.00
3,297.54
17,353.54
50
Nancy Ben
14,890.36
3,493.28
18,383.64
51
Micks Gapa
15,038.80
3,528.10
18,566.90
52
Maria Nelson
13,804.00
3,238.42
17,042.42
53
Nimai Derev
15,197.18
3,565.26
18,762.44
54
Kapara Kumbuima
13,986.00
3,281.12
17,267.12
55
Kamape Jeff
14,107.60
3,309.64
17,417.24
56
Nelson Bulda
16,167.90
3,792.99
19,960.89
57
Pastor Basfario
18,832.00
4,417.99
23,249.99
58
Kambu Otto
17,362.10
4,073.15
21,435.25
59
Josephine Topa
22,282.16
5,227.39
27,509.55
60
Julian Bisay
15,290.00
3,587.03
18,877.03
61
Mark Nokae
21,313.00
5,000.03
26,313.03
62
Mecky Wasiery
16,056.40
3,766.83
19,823.23
63
Martin Owen
13,457.00
3,157.01
16,614.01
64
Marshall T
14,206.00
3,332.73
17,538.73
65
Mathias Koima
12,351.00
2,897.54
15,248.54
66
Mama Rumbiak
13,983.40
3,280.51
17,263.91
67
Max Riaba
16,163.48
3,791.95
19,955.43
68
Mote Elomi
13,241.40
3,106.43
16,347.83
69
Mathias Godfrey
14,868.00
3,488.03
18,356.03
70
Monda Kamame
13,853.20
3,249.96
17,103.16
71
Moses Mitna
25,255.40
5,924.92
31,180.32
72
Niakili Seva
13,804.00
3,238.42
17,042.42
73
Ponny Wafumelena
16,655.40
3,907.36
20,562.76
74
Sause Wura
13,768.80
3,230.16
16,998.96
75
Ruben Kebri
13,280.00
3,115.49
16,395.49
76
Rose Kamane
14,113.20
3,310.96
17,424.16
77
Yaldua Kimbiyal
13,858.80
3,251.27
17,110.07
78
William Brabar
17,993.00
4,221.16
22,214.16
79
Tonny Vatabu
18,922.20
4,439.15
23,361.35
80
Tommy Imbirir
17,525.44
4,111.47
21,636.91
81
Tinus Wally
14,627.00
3,431.49
18,058.49
82
Steven Lila
12,277.40
2,880.28
15,157.68
83
Zina Rumbiak
14,330.60
3,361.96
17,692.56


Total
1,291,364.86
302,954.20
1,594,319.06

_____________________________________________________________
Bristle Lawyers: Lawyers for the Plaintiffs
Solicitor-General: Lawyers for the Defendants


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/pg/cases/PGNC/2023/325.html