PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

National Court of Papua New Guinea

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> National Court of Papua New Guinea >> 2018 >> [2018] PGNC 28

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

Munvi v Takai [2018] PGNC 28; N7100 (9 February 2018)

N7100

PAPUA NEW GUINEA
[IN THE NATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]


WS (HR) NO 19 OF 2015


THOMPSON MUNVI FOR HIMSELF
AND 1,334 OTHERS NAMED IN THE SCHEDULE TO THE WRIT
Plaintiffs


V


SENIOR CONSTABLE ARNOLD ULKA TAKAI,
RAPID RESPONSE UNIT, MADANG
First Defendant


CHIEF INSPECTOR, SYLVESTAR KALAUT,
PROVINCIAL POLICE COMMANDER, MADANG
Second Defendant


THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
Third Defendant


MADANG PROVINCIAL LANDS OFFICER
Fourth Defendant


MADANG PROVINCIAL ADMINISTRATOR
Fifth Defendant


MADANG PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT
Sixth Defendant


THE INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA
Seventh Defendant


RD FISHING PNG LIMITED
Eighth Defendant




Madang: Cannings J
2017: 1 March, 4 April, 1 May, 20 July, 1 August,
2018: 9 February


DAMAGES – breach of human rights – negligence – Police raid of rural settlement – property damage – assault.


The plaintiffs sued the defendants (various members of the Police Force and the State and the registered proprietor of a portion of land on which they had been living) in connection with an eviction exercise involving a Police raid of the land on which they were living and destruction of their homes, gardens and other properties and assault of some plaintiffs. The causes of action pleaded in their statement of claim were breaches of human rights and negligence. Default judgment was entered against the defendants. At the trial on assessment of damages, 106 plaintiffs gave evidence and sought damages in three categories: (a) general damages for pain and suffering, distress etc, K50,000.00 each, totalling K5,300,000.00; (b) property losses, various amounts, totalling K13,015,825.80; and (c) breach of human rights, K5,000.00 each, totalling K530,000.00; a grand total of K18,845,825.80. In response, the defendants adduced no evidence, and the registered proprietor did not appear at the trial. Those defendants that did appear (the Police and the State) argued that the question of liability should be revisited and the entire proceedings dismissed and the plaintiffs awarded nothing due to defects in the statement of claim; and in the alternative that the plaintiffs should be awarded no more than K5,000.00 each, a total of K530,000.00, due to a lack of evidence to support the claims.


Held:


(1) The State’s preliminary argument was rejected as it was made late, without notice and without evidence. Such arguments must be made by notice of motion, in a timely manner and supported by affidavit. In any event the statement of claim was clearly drafted and adequately pleaded causes of action in breach of human rights. The Court proceeded to assess damages on the basis of the evidence before it.

(2) It was appropriate to award damages to each plaintiff who had given evidence. Though there were some deficiencies in the plaintiffs’ evidence, there was no evidence brought by the State, and no submission, to contest the fundamental allegation that an eviction exercise, unsupported by the order of any Court, took place in the manner alleged, involving destruction of property, fear and distress and bodily assault on some plaintiffs.

(3) Damages were awarded to each plaintiff who gave evidence in the following amounts: (a) general damages for pain and suffering, distress etc, K10,000.00 each, totalling K1,060,000.00; (b) property losses, each claim was discounted by 90% to arrive at an appropriate assessment, totalling K1,301,582.58; and (c) breach of human rights, K5,000.00 each, totalling K530,000.00; a grand total of K2,891,582.58. In addition each plaintiff was awarded interest on the amount of damages awarded to them, at the rate of 2% per annum, for the period from the date of the filing of the writ to the date of judgment, a period of 2.5 years, totalling K144,579.13. The total judgment sum was damages of K2,891,582.58 + interest of K144,579.13 = K3,036,161.71.

Cases cited


The following cases are cited in the judgment:


Albert Baine v The State (1995) N1335
Alphonse Willie v Simon Kaupa (2016) N6553
Anuta Jobou v Alfred Kumasi and The State (2012) N4607
Eton Pakui v The State (2006) N2977
Francis Fuliva v Inspector Tony Wagambie Junior (2013) N5221
Joe Tipaiza v James Yali (2008) N3472
Jonathan Mangope Paraia v The State (1995) N1343
Justin Bau v Paul Karl (2010) N4123
Kolaip Palapi v Sergeant Poko (2001) N2274
Kopung Brothers Business Group v Sakawar Kasieng [1997] PNGLR 331
London Association for the Protection of Trade v Greenlands Ltd [1916] 2 AC 15
Peter Wanis v Fred Sikiot and The State (1995) N1350
Philip Nare v The State (2017) SC1584
William Mel v Coleman Pakalia (2005) SC790
Yange Lagan v The State (1995) N1369
Yooken Paklin v The State (2001) N2212


TRIAL


This was a trial on assessment of damages following entry of default judgment.


Counsel


G Pipike, for the Plaintiffs
B B Wak, for the First, Second, Third & Seventh Defendants


9th February, 2018


1. CANNINGS J: This was a trial on assessment of damages following entry of default judgment against various members of the Police Force (the first, second and third defendants) and the State (seventh defendant) and RD Fishing Ltd (the eighth defendant). The proceedings against the fourth, fifth and sixth defendants have been discontinued.


2. The plaintiffs are former residents of Maiwara compound, commonly known as Portion 625, in the Vidar area of Madang District, Madang Province. They commenced proceedings against the State and other defendants in August 2015, claiming damages for alleged breaches of human rights committed by members of the Police Force in connection with an eviction exercise conducted in April-May 2014. They alleged that members of the Police Force, most of them members of the rapid response unit at Madang, raided the land on which they were living and destroyed their homes, gardens and other properties and in some cases threatened and assaulted the plaintiffs. It was claimed that the eviction exercise was requested and sponsored by RD Fishing Ltd, even though that company had ceased to be registered proprietor of the land, having surrendered its State Lease on 15 May 2009.


3. The defendants failed to properly defend the matter and on 4 March 2016 default judgment was entered against the following defendants:


4. Since default judgment was entered, the Supreme Court has in Philip Nare v The State (2017) SC1584 pointed to the futility of seeking or ordering judgment against the Commissioner of Police in cases such as the present, where the claim and the order should be made only against the State – unless the Commissioner is alleged or found to have been personally involved in the wrongful conduct giving rise to vicarious liability of the State. In this case there has never been any suggestion or finding of personal involvement by the Commissioner.


5. I have decided therefore on the own motion of the Court to set aside the default judgment against the Commissioner (the third defendant) and the two other Police defendants (the first and second defendants). I have also decided for the avoidance of doubt that the proceedings against the Commissioner and the other two Police defendants should be dismissed. These decisions, which do not materially prejudice the plaintiffs or the State, are reflected in the final order of the Court and ensure that there are no unresolved issues after entry of judgment on assessment against the State, and RD Tuna Ltd. This will make enforcement of the judgment a more realistic prospect and advance the interests of justice.


PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE


6. At this trial on assessment of damages, the plaintiffs sought damages in three categories:


(a) general damages for pain and suffering, distress etc, K50,000.00 each, totalling K5,300,000.00;


(b) “special damages”, which is better regarded as a claim for property losses, various amounts, totalling K13,015,825.80; and


(c) breach of human rights, K5,000.00 each, totalling K530,000.00;


a grand total of K18,845,825.80.


7. RD Fishing did not appear at the trial. Those defendants that did appear (the Police and the State) argued that the question of liability should be revisited and the entire proceedings dismissed and the plaintiffs awarded nothing due to defects in the statement of claim; and in the alternative that the plaintiffs should be awarded no more than K5,000.00 each, a total of K530,000.00, due to a lack of evidence to support the claims.


EVIDENCE


8. The plaintiffs’ case consisted of affidavits sworn by 106 plaintiffs and an affidavit by Gibson Kama, a registered valuer, annexing a separate valuation report he prepared in respect of property losses for each plaintiff who gave evidence. Each of the plaintiffs’ affidavits set out what the police had done and the property damage, assaults and threats that the deponent had incurred and/or witnessed. The defendants adduced no evidence.


PRELIMINARY ARGUMENT


9. I dismiss the State’s preliminary argument about revisiting the question of liability and dismissing the proceedings. The argument has been made late (well after entry of default judgment), without notice and without evidence. Such arguments must be made by notice of motion, in a timely manner (in this case, soon after entry of default judgment) and supported by affidavit. Alternatively the State should have appealed to the Supreme Court against the entry of default judgment.


10. As explained by the Supreme Court in William Mel v Coleman Pakalia (2005) SC790, the role of the judge assessing damages after entry of default judgment is:


11. I am satisfied that the facts and the causes of action are pleaded with sufficient clarity. Liability is therefore regarded as proven. The plaintiffs have established causes of action against the first, second, third, seventh and eighth defendants for negligence and breach of human rights, in particular, breach of the following:


GENERAL PRINCIPLES FOR ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES


12. In assessing damages I have had regard to the following principles:


APPROACH TO ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES


13. I am persuaded by the submissions of counsel for the plaintiffs, Mr Pipike, that even though only a small proportion of the 1,335 plaintiffs named on the writ have given evidence, the evidence that has been given is of sufficient quality to make an assessment of damages in respect of each of the 106 plaintiffs who has given evidence. I will assess damages in the three categories of damages claimed by the plaintiffs.


(a) GENERAL DAMAGES

14. Mr Pipike submitted that each plaintiff who has given evidence should be awarded K50,000.00 general damages. It is clear that it was a frighting and disturbing experience for all plaintiffs to see the Police enter the land on which they had been living for many years and threaten them with firearms as they set about burning their dwellings. However, there is insufficient evidence and precedent available on which an award of K50,000.00 would be warranted. I award each plaintiff who has given evidence the sum of K10,000.00.


(b) PROPERTY LOSSES

15. I am persuaded by the submissions of counsel for the State, Mr Wak, that a lack of corroboration pervades the plaintiffs’ evidence as to property losses, calling into question its veracity. For example, the lead plaintiff Thompson Munvi claims property losses of K508,100.00 plus a house said to be destroyed worth K111,500.00, a total of K619,600.00. He has given evidence in support of these amounts, including a valuation report by Mr Kama, which, frankly I find difficult to accept as it appears to be based on very generous assumptions as to what property the plaintiff had on the land. There is no independent verification of the extent of the damage. I do not find it credible that property of that value would have been on a small rural block. Most plaintiffs are claiming property losses exceeding K100,000.00, which seems incongruous with the standard of living reasonably expected to be applicable to a group of settlers on a rural portion of land.


16. The plaintiffs’ claims are in my view exaggerated. It is nonetheless appropriate to arrive at an assessment of damages. Though there are deficiencies in the plaintiffs’ evidence, there was no evidence brought by the State, and no submission, to contest the fundamental allegation that an unlawful eviction exercise, unsupported by the order of any Court, took place in the manner alleged, involving mass destruction of property.


17. I have had regard to the approach I have taken in a number of other cases of multiple plaintiffs, most of which are “police raid cases”. In some cases I have discounted each claim by a certain percentage to arrive at reasonable and realistic sums. For example:


18. In other cases I have awarded the same global sum to each plaintiff who has given evidence. For example:


19. I have decided to take the first approach outlined above. I will discount each claim by 90% to take account of the deficiencies in the evidence. The result of this process of assessment is shown in table 1. Column 1 is the number ascribed to the plaintiff according to the numbering of his or her affidavit. Column 2 is the plaintiff’s name. Column 3 is the amount claimed by the plaintiff for property, apart from house, losses. Column 4 is a claim for the value of the plaintiff’s destroyed house. Column 5 is the total of columns 3 and 4: the plaintiff’s total claim for property losses. Column 6 is the figure in column 5 multiplied by 10% (representing the discounting of the total claim for property losses by 90%). It is the figure in column 6 that is the amount awarded to the plaintiff for property losses (category (b) of the claims).


TABLE 1: AWARD OF DAMAGES
FOR PROPERTY LOSSES INCLUDING HOUSE LOSSES

No
Name
Claim for property losses (K)
Claim for loss of house (K)
Total claim for property losses (K)
Amount awarded
(K)
Janet Amos
94,848.50
29,000.00
123,848.50
12,384.85
Prisla Gambura
99,988.00
28,000.00
127,988.00
12,798.80
Naiwa Lalong
45,070.00
24,500.00
69,570.00
6,957.00
James Kaut
25,685.70
25,500.00
51,185.70
5,118.57
Albert Koli
243,450.00
124,500.00
367,950.00
36,795.00
Thompson
Munvi
508,100.00
111,500.00
619,600.00
61,960.00
Florin Nanawan
307,834.00
111,000.00
418,834.00
41,883.40
Gambura Maima
102,482.00
27,000.00
129,482.00
12,948.20
Bernard Siloi
85,200.00
57,000.00
142,200.00
14,220.00
Febronia Siloi Taddie
91,608.00
27,500.00
119,108.00
11,910.80
Hansen Makis
286,711.00
32,500.00
319,211.00
31,921.10
Bonny Ikon
45,470.00
25,500.00
70,970.00
7,097.00
Jimmy Dimat
16,273.00
25,500.00
41,773.00
4,177.30
Joe Nuknai
113,859.00
25,500.00
139,359.00
13,935.90
Ishmael Kabe
16,441.40
25,500.00
41,941.40
4,194.14
Tonny Kaut
58,770.00
29,000.00
87,770.00
8,777.00
Clement Beiyo
15,587.00
25,500.00
41,087.00
4,108.70
John Jikera
77,962.00
59,000.00
136,962.00
13,696.20
Jacob Apito
63,400.00
25,500.00
88,900.00
8,890.00
Belly Jones
79,848.50
25,500.00
105,348.50
10,534.85
Michael Mauk
83,854.00
20,000.00
103,854.00
10,385.40
Joseph Kubali
12,395.00
10,000.00
22,395.00
2,239.50
Johnny Boi Holonga
110,169.00
61,000.00
171,169.00
17,116.90
Patrick Beiyo
61,645.20
29,500.00
91,145.20
9,114.52
John Asaruka
128,550.00
25,500.00
154,050.00
15,405.00
Daniel Ambri
23,043.00
37,500.00
60,543.00
6,054.30
Smith Beiyo
64,335.00
29,000.00
93,335.00
9,333.50
Junior Tamen
60,330.00
40,500.00
100,830.00
10,083.00
Nick Dadu
87,550.00
29,500.00
117,050.00
11,705.00
Nanigu Peter
43,050.00
29,000.00
72,050.00
7,205.00
Melchior Naah
47,673.00
17,000.00
64,673.00
6,467.30
Rodney Kaima
89,840.00
54,000.00
143,840.00
14,384.00
Mick Awun
19,820.00
24,500.00
44,320.00
4,432.00
Rosa Luku
41,930.00
29,000.00
70,930.00
7,093.00
Thomas Bidigut
20,995.00
24,000.00
44,995.00
4,499.50
Richard Manula
28,751.14
29,000.00
57,751.14
5,775.11
Robert Nanut
54,626.10
29,000.00
83,626.10
8,362.61
Thresia Auk
54,970.00
29,000.00
83,970.00
8,397.00
Henrick Mebo
55,300.00
25,500.00
80,800.00
8,080.00
Sau Bonga
37,665.00
29,000.00
66,665.00
6,666.50
Rose Hoe
86,001.00
50,000.00
136,001.00
13,600.10
Stanley Dulai
26,424.00
24,500.00
50,924.00
5,092.40
Benjamin Upinguru
93,340.00
25,500.00
118,840.00
11,884.00
Leo Niangu
44,566.00
24,500.00
69,066.00
6,906.60
Rex Marky
54,626.10
29,000.00
83,626.10
8,362.61
John Siune
77,962.00
45,000.00
122,962.00
12,296.20
Franky Munongsi
94,848.00
32,000.00
126,848.00
12,684.80
Salome Salameng
94,255.00
42,000.00
136,255.00
13,625.50
Peter Samigum
90,705.00
54,000.00
144,705.00
14,470.50
Patrick Yalkuna
86,395.00
54,000.00
140,395.00
14,039.50
Roger Bomai
49,495.00
29,000.00
78,495.00
7,849.50
Samson Charlie
22,895.00
24,500.00
47,395.00
4,739.50
Pamela Thomas Kagl
93,800.00
29,500.00
123,300.00
12,330.00
Steven Nakra
67,400.00
29,000.00
96,400.00
9,640.00
Michael Bidam
94,848.50
29,000.00
123,848.50
12,384.85
Peter Lowa
169,098.66
37,000.00
206,098.66
20,609.87
Isaac Ibun
57,550.00
25,500.00
83,050.00
8,305.00
Martin Ibung
91,608.00
19,000.00
110,608.00
11,060.80
Joseph Souket
77,962.00
52,000.00
129,962.00
12,996.20
Billy Supin
90,650.00
25,500.00
116,150.00
11,615.00
Moses Pafu
33,776.00
26,000.00
59,776.00
5,977.60
Victor Kaitok
61,255.00
29,000.00
90,255.00
9,025.50
Robert Paliangu
68,278.00
29,000.00
97,278.00
9,727.80
Bernard Mainduo
86,800.00
25,500.00
112,300.00
11,230.00
Thomas Morok
280,658.90
100,000.00
380,658.90
38,065.89
Oscar Pilleng
94,060.00
29,500.00
123,560.00
12,356.00
Alphonse Kanum
51,500.00
24,500.00
76,000.00
7,600.00
John Mamine
87,550.00
26,500.00
114,050.00
11,405.00
Peter Kumane
83,900.00
20,000.00
103,900.00
10,390.00
Tei Julie
305,980.00
84,000.00
389,980.00
38,998.00
Plistine Maris
33,190.00
24,500.00
57,690.00
5,769.00
George Pius
95,938.00
25,500.00
121,438.00
12,143.80
Claira Anzar
78,800.00
25,500.00
104,300.00
10,430.00
Paul Singer
144,440.00
54,000.00
198,440.00
19,844.00
Pius Wakor
44,566.00
29,000.00
73,566.00
7,356.60
Margaret Hoe
54,940.00
24,500.00
79,440.00
7,944.00
Casius Morok
99,150.00
25,500.00
124,650.00
12,465.00
Anna Moi
59,460.00
25,500.00
84,960.00
8,496.00
Jacob Nomeri
45,470.00
25,500.00
70,970.00
7,097.00
Tony Dick
61,255.00
29,000.00
90,255.00
9,025.50
Kaigo Neknek
119,870.00
58,000.00
177,870.00
17,787.00
John Tumun
121,120.00
65,000.00
186,120.00
18,612.00
Elizah Otto
55,300.00
25,500.00
80,800.00
8,080.00
Ruben John
185,284.70
54,000.00
239,284.70
23,928.47
Andrew Palma
42,000.00
25,500.00
67,500.00
6,750.00
Paul Karua
48,550.00
24,500.00
73,050.00
7,305.00
Diana Kepas
57,600.00
25,500.00
83,100.00
8,310.00
Dickson Mulu
111,960.00
101,000.00
212,960.00
21,296.00
Joyce Kami
77,962.00
72,000.00
149,962.00
14,996.20
Roka Gaima
32,790.00
29,000.00
61,790.00
6,179.00
Thomas Kagl
127,440.00
80,500.00
207,940.00
20,794.00
Isaac Oisima
87,550.00
25,500.00
113,050.00
11,305.00
Abigle Bigea
58,300.00
22,000.00
80,300.00
8,030.00
Casper Beiyo
94,848.50
25,500.00
120,348.50
12,034.85
Andrew Palinga
51,640.00
29,500.00
81,140.00
8,114.00
Marcelus Morok
99,355.00
26,500.00
125,855.00
12,585.50
Rebecca Kaipo
99,988.00
29,000.00
128,988.00
12,898.80
Solanus Masai
75,068.00
20,000.00
95,068.00
9,506.80
Joachim Kais
87,550.00
25,500.00
113,050.00
11,305.00
John Kari
62,390.00
25,500.00
87,890.00
8,789.00
Maria Igum
18,656.00
20,000.00
38,656.00
3,865.60
Lina Sazaka
87,550.00
29,500.00
117,050.00
11,705.00
Veronica Siune
138,630.00
54,000.00
192,630.00
19,263.00
Joe Munvi
216,100.50
33,000.00
249,100.50
24,910.05
Ruben Baita
25,347.40
24,500.00
49,847.40
4,984.74
Rebecca Michael
84,000.00
29,000.00
113,000.00
11,300.00
Total
9,207,325.80
3,808,500.00
13,015,825.80
1,301,582.58

(c) COMPENSATION FOR BREACH OF HUMAN RIGHTS

20. It is appropriate to award a separate sum as compensation for breaches of human rights. I award the amount claimed, K5,000.00 for each plaintiff.


21. The total amount of compensation for breach of human rights is 106 plaintiffs x K5,000.00 per plaintiff = K530,000.00.


SUMMARY


22. Each plaintiff who has given evidence is awarded the total of the following sums:


(a) General damages: K10,000.00;
(b) Property losses: the amount shown for that plaintiff in table 1;
(c) Compensation for breach of human rights: K5,000.00.

23. The total award of damages to each plaintiff who has given evidence is shown in table 2.


TABLE 2: TOTAL AWARD OF DAMAGES

No
Name
(a) General damages
(b) Property losses
(c) Compensation
breach of human rights
Amount awarded
(K)
Janet Amos
10,000.00
12,384.85
5,000.00
27,384.85
Prisla Gambura
10,000.00
12,798.80
5,000.00
27,798.80
Naiwa Lalong
10,000.00
6,957.00
5,000.00
21,957.00
James Kaut
10,000.00
5,118.57
5,000.00
20,118.57
Albert Koli
10,000.00
36,795.00
5,000.00
51,795.00
Thompson
Munvi
10,000.00
61,960.00
5,000.00
76,960.00
Florin Nanawan
10,000.00
41,883.40
5,000.00
56,883.40
Gambura Maima
10,000.00
12,948.20
5,000.00
27,948.20
Bernard Siloi
10,000.00
14,220.00
5,000.00
29,220.00
Febronia Siloi Taddie
10,000.00
11,910.80
5,000.00
26,910.80
Hansen Makis
10,000.00
31,921.10
5,000.00
46,921.10
Bonny Ikon
10,000.00
7,097.00
5,000.00
22,097.00
Jimmy Dimat
10,000.00
4,177.30
5,000.00
19,177.30
Joe Nuknai
10,000.00
13,935.90
5,000.00
28,935.90
Ishmael Kabe
10,000.00
4,194.14
5,000.00
19,194.14
Tonny Kaut
10,000.00
8,777.00
5,000.00
23,777.00
Clement Beiyo
10,000.00
4,108.70
5,000.00
19,108.70
John Jikera
10,000.00
13,696.20
5,000.00
28,696.20
Jacob Apito
10,000.00
8,890.00
5,000.00
23,890.00
Belly Jones
10,000.00
10,534.85
5,000.00
25,534.85
Michael Mauk
10,000.00
10,385.40
5,000.00
25,385.40
Joseph Kubali
10,000.00
2,239.50
5,000.00
17,239.50
Johnny Boi Holonga
10,000.00
17,116.90
5,000.00
32,116.90
Patrick Beiyo
10,000.00
9,114.52
5,000.00
24,114.52
John Asaruka
10,000.00
15,405.00
5,000.00
30,405.00
Daniel Ambri
10,000.00
6,054.30
5,000.00
21,054.30
Smith Beiyo
10,000.00
9,333.50
5,000.00
24,333.50
Junior Tamen
10,000.00
10,083.00
5,000.00
25,083.00
Nick Dadu
10,000.00
11,705.00
5,000.00
26,705.00
Nanigu Peter
10,000.00
7,205.00
5,000.00
22,205.00
Melchior Naah
10,000.00
6,467.30
5,000.00
21,467.30
Rodney Kaima
10,000.00
14,384.00
5,000.00
29,384.00
Mick Awun
10,000.00
4,432.00
5,000.00
19,432.00
Rosa Luku
10,000.00
7,093.00
5,000.00
22,093.00
Thomas Bidigut
10,000.00
4,499.50
5,000.00
19,499.50
Richard Manula
10,000.00
5,775.11
5,000.00
20,775.11
Robert Nanut
10,000.00
8,362.61
5,000.00
23,362.61
Thresia Auk
10,000.00
8,397.00
5,000.00
23,397.00
Henrick Mebo
10,000.00
8,080.00
5,000.00
23,080.00
Sau Bonga
10,000.00
6,666.50
5,000.00
21,666.50
Rose Hoe
10,000.00
13,600.10
5,000.00
28,600.10
Stanley Dulai
10,000.00
5,092.40
5,000.00
20,092.40
Benjamin Upinguri
10,000.00
11,884.00
5,000.00
26,884.00
Leo Niangu
10,000.00
6,906.60
5,000.00
21,906.60
Rex Marky
10,000.00
8,362.61
5,000.00
23,362.61
John Siune
10,000.00
12,296.20
5,000.00
27,296.20
Franky Munongsi
10,000.00
12,684.80
5,000.00
27,684.80
Salome Salameng
10,000.00
13,625.50
5,000.00
28,625.50
Peter Samigum
10,000.00
14,470.50
5,000.00
29,470.50
Patrick Yalkuna
10,000.00
14,039.50
5,000.00
29,039.50
Roger Bomai
10,000.00
7,849.50
5,000.00
22,849.50
Samson Charlie
10,000.00
4,739.50
5,000.00
19,739.50
Pamela Thomas Kagl
10,000.00
12,330.00
5,000.00
27,330.00
Steven Nakra
10,000.00
9,640.00
5,000.00
24,640.00
Michael Bidam
10,000.00
12,384.85
5,000.00
27,384.85
Peter Lowa
10,000.00
20,609.87
5,000.00
35,609.87
Isaac Ibun
10,000.00
8,305.00
5,000.00
23,305.00
Martin Ibung
10,000.00
11,060.80
5,000.00
26,060.80
Joseph Souket
10,000.00
12,996.20
5,000.00
27,996.20
Billy Supin
10,000.00
11,615.00
5,000.00
26,615.00
Moses Pafu
10,000.00
5,977.60
5,000.00
20,977.60
Victor Kaitok
10,000.00
9,025.50
5,000.00
24,025.50
Robert Paliangu
10,000.00
9,727.80
5,000.00
24,727.80
Bernard Mainduo
10,000.00
11,230.00
5,000.00
26,230.00
Thomas Morok
10,000.00
38,065.89
5,000.00
53,065.89
Oscar Pilleng
10,000.00
12,356.00
5,000.00
27,356.00
Alphonse Kanum
10,000.00
7,600.00
5,000.00
22,600.00
John Mamine
10,000.00
11,405.00
5,000.00
26,405.00
Peter Kumane
10,000.00
10,390.00
5,000.00
25,390.00
Tei Julie
10,000.00
38,998.00
5,000.00
53,998.00
Plistine Maris
10,000.00
5,769.00
5,000.00
20,769.00
George Pius
10,000.00
12,143.80
5,000.00
27,143.80
Claira Anzar
10,000.00
10,430.00
5,000.00
25,430.00
Paul Singer
10,000.00
19,844.00
5,000.00
34,844.00
Pius Wakor
10,000.00
7,356.60
5,000.00
22,356.60
Margaret Hoe
10,000.00
7,944.00
5,000.00
22,944.00
Casius Morok
10,000.00
12,465.00
5,000.00
27,465.00
Anna Moi
10,000.00
8,496.00
5,000.00
23,496.00
Jacob Nomeri
10,000.00
7,097.00
5,000.00
22,097.00
Tonny Dick
10,000.00
9,025.50
5,000.00
24,025.50
Kaigo Neknek
10,000.00
17,787.00
5,000.00
32,787.00
John Tumun
10,000.00
18,612.00
5,000.00
33,612.00
Elizah Otto
10,000.00
8,080.00
5,000.00
23,080.00
Reuben John
10,000.00
23,928.47
5,000.00
38,928.47
Andrew Palma
10,000.00
6,750.00
5,000.00
21,750.00
Paul Karua
10,000.00
7,305.00
5,000.00
22,305.00
Diana Kepas
10,000.00
8,310.00
5,000.00
23,310.00
Dickson Mulu
10,000.00
21,296.00
5,000.00
36,296.00
Joyce Kami
10,000.00
14,996.20
5,000.00
29,996.20
Roka Gaima
10,000.00
6,179.00
5,000.00
21,179.00
Thomas Kagl
10,000.00
20,794.00
5,000.00
35,794.00
Isaac Oisima
10,000.00
11,305.00
5,000.00
26,305.00
Abigail Bigea
10,000.00
8,030.00
5,000.00
23,030.00
Casper Beiyo
10,000.00
12,034.85
5,000.00
27,034.85
Andrew Palinga
10,000.00
8,114.00
5,000.00
23,114.00
Marcelus Morok
10,000.00
12,585.50
5,000.00
27,585.50
Rebecca Kaipo
10,000.00
12,898.80
5,000.00
27,898.80
Solanus Masai
10,000.00
9,506.80
5,000.00
24,506.80
Joachim Kais
10,000.00
11,305.00
5,000.00
26,305.00
John Kari
10,000.00
8,789.00
5,000.00
23,789.00
Maria Igum
10,000.00
3,865.60
5,000.00
18,865.60
Lina Sazaka
10,000.00
11,705.00
5,000.00
26,705.00
Veronica Siune
10,000.00
19,263.00
5,000.00
34,263.00
Joe Munvi
10,000.00
24,910.05
5,000.00
39,910.05
Reuben Baita
10,000.00
4,984.74
5,000.00
19,984.74
Rebecca Michael
10,000.00
11,300.00
5,000.00
26,300.00
Total
1,060,000.00
1,301,582.58
530,000.00
2,891,582.58

INTEREST


24. Mr Pipike submitted that interest should be awarded on the total amount of damages awarded to each plaintiff under the Judicial Proceedings (Interest on Debts and Damages) Act 2015. He seeks interest at the rate of 2% per annum against the State (in line with Section 4(3) of that Act) and 8% per annum against RD Fishing Ltd. I will not distinguish between the different defendants in that way. The rate of interest is discretionary. I think it would make enforcement of the judgment debt too cumbersome to award interest at different rates.


25. As for the period in respect of which interest is calculated, I fix the start date as the date of the filing of the writ, 5 August 2015. The end date will be the date of delivery of this judgment. The relevant period is 2.5 years. Interest will be awarded by applying the formula D x I x N = A, where D is the amount of damages, I is the interest rate per annum, N is the period in years, A is the amount of interest. Interest has thus been calculated by multiplying each award of damages by a factor of 0.05 (0.02 x 2.5) and is shown in the Schedule below.


APPORTIONMENT


26. Mr Pipike submitted that the Court should apportion responsibility for satisfying the judgment debt on a 50:50 basis as between the State and RD Fishing Ltd. I am not sure that that would benefit the plaintiffs. I think a better and fairer approach is to simply order that the seventh and eighth defendants are liable in damages.


27. If a judgment is signed against two or more defendants generally for the same cause of action without apportioning liability amongst them the presumption arises that all defendants are jointly and severally liable for damages and for satisfaction of the judgment debt after assessment of damages (London Association for the Protection of Trade v Greenlands Ltd [1916] 2 AC 15). The plaintiff is awarded the entire damages against each defendant. The plaintiff can pursue satisfaction of the entire judgment against one or more of the defendants provided not more than the total judgment is recovered.


COSTS


28. The general rule is that costs follow the event, ie the successful party has its costs paid for by the losing party on a party-to-party basis. The question of costs is a discretionary matter. I have given close consideration to awarding the plaintiffs only part of their costs as I have found their claims to be exaggerated. However the State made submissions that were also largely rejected. As for RD Fishing Ltd, it failed to appear and assist the Court. I have decided that costs will follow the event.


ORDER


  1. Damages are payable by the seventh and eighth defendants to each plaintiff whose name appears in the Schedule, in the amount shown for each plaintiff.
  2. In addition, interest is payable by the seventh and eighth defendants to each plaintiff whose name appears in the Schedule, in the amount shown for each plaintiff.
  3. The case of each plaintiff whose name does not appear in the Schedule is dismissed.
  4. The proceedings against the first, second and third defendants are dismissed.
  5. Subject to any particular costs order to the contrary, costs of the entire proceedings shall be paid by the seventh and eighth defendants to the plaintiffs whose name appears in the Schedule, on a party-party basis, to be taxed if not agreed.

SCHEDULE

No
Name
Total damages
(K)
Interest
(K) X 0.05
Total award of damages + interest
(K)
Janet Amos
27,384.85
1,369.24
28,754.09
Prisla Gambura
27,798.80
1,389.94
29,188.74
Naiwa Lalong
21,957.00
1,097.85
23,054.85
James Kaut
20,118.57
1,005.93
21,124.50
Albert Koli
51,795.00
2,589.75
54,384.75
Thompson Munvi
76,960.00
3,848.00
80,808.00
Florin Nanawan
56,883.40
2,844.17
59,727.57
Gambura Maima
27,948.20
1,397.41
29,345.61
Bernard Siloi
29,220.00
1,461.00
30,681.00
Febronia Siloi Taddie
26,910.80
1,345.54
28,256.34
Hansen Makis
46,921.10
2,346.06
49,267.16
Bonny Ikon
22,097.00
1,104.85
23,201.85
Jimmy Dimat
19,177.30
958.87
20,136.17
Joe Nuknai
28,935.90
1,446.80
30,382.70
Ishmael Kabe
19,194.14
959.71
20,153.85
Tonny Kaut
23,777.00
1,188.85
24,965.85
Clement Beiyo
19,108.70
955.44
20,064.14
John Jikera
28,696.20
1,434.81
30,131.01
Jacob Apito
23,890.00
1,194.50
25,084.50
Belly Jones
25,534.85
1,276.74
26,811.59
Michael Mauk
25,385.40
1,269.27
26,654.67
Joseph Kubali
17,239.50
861.98
18,101.48
Johnny Boi Holonga
32,116.90
1,605.85
33,722.75
Patrick Beiyo
24,114.52
1,205.73
25,320.25
John Asaruka
30,405.00
1,520.25
31,925.25
Daniel Ambri
21,054.30
1,052.72
22,107.02
Smith Beiyo
24,333.50
1,216.68
25,550.18
Junior Tamen
25,083.00
1,254.15
26,337.15
Nick Dadu
26,705.00
1,335.25
28,040.25
Nanigu Peter
22,205.00
1,110.25
23,315.25
Melchior Naah
21,467.30
1,073.37
22,540.67
Rodney Kaima
29,384.00
1,469.20
30,853.20
Mick Awun
19,432.00
971.60
20,403.60
Rosa Luku
22,093.00
1,104.65
23,197.65
Thomas Bidigut
19,499.50
974.98
20,474.48
Richard Manula
20,775.11
1,038.76
21,813.87
Robert Nanut
23,362.61
1,168.13
24,530.74
Thresia Auk
23,397.00
1,169.85
24,566.85
Henrick Mebo
23,080.00
1,154.00
24,234.00
Sau Bonga
21,666.50
1,083.33
22,749.83
Rose Hoe
28,600.10
1,430.01
30,030.11
Stanley Dulai
20,092.40
1,004.62
21,097.02
Benjamin Upinguri
26,884.00
1,344.20
28,228.20
Leo Niangu
21,906.60
1,095.33
23,001.93
Rex Marky
23,362.61
1,168.13
24,530.74
John Siune
27,296.20
1,364.81
28,661.01
Franky Munongsi
27,684.80
1,384.24
29,069.04
Salome Salameng
28,625.50
1,431.28
30,056.78
Peter Samigum
29,470.50
1,473.53
30,944.03
Patrick Yalkuna
29,039.50
1,451.98
30,491.48
Roger Bomai
22,849.50
1,142.48
23,991.98
Samson Charlie
19,739.50
986.98
20,726.48
Pamela Thomas Kagl
27,330.00
1,366.50
28,696.50
Steven Nakra
24,640.00
1,232.00
25,872.00
Michael Bidam
27,384.85
1,369.24
28,754.09
Peter Lowa
35,609.87
1,780.49
37,390.36
Isaac Ibun
23,305.00
1,165.25
24,470.25
Martin Ibung
26,060.80
1,303.04
27,363.84
Joseph Souket
27,996.20
1,399.81
29,396.01
Billy Supin
26,615.00
1,330.75
27,945.75
Moses Pafu
20,977.60
1,048.88
22,026.48
Victor Kaitok
24,025.50
1,201.28
25,226.78
Robert Paliangu
24,727.80
1,236.39
25,964.19
Bernard Mainduo
26,230.00
1,311.50
27,541.50
Thomas Morok
53,065.89
2,653.29
55,719.18
Oscar Pilleng
27,356.00
1,367.80
28,723.80
Alphonse Kanum
22,600.00
1,130.00
23,730.00
John Mamine
26,405.00
1,320.25
27,725.25
Peter Kumane
25,390.00
1,269.50
26,659.50
Tei Julie
53,998.00
2,699.90
56,697.90
Plistine Maris
20,769.00
1,038.45
21,807.45
George Pius
27,143.80
1,357.19
28,500.99
Claira Anzar
25,430.00
1,271.50
26,701.50
Paul Singer
34,844.00
1,742.20
36,586.20
Pius Wakor
22,356.60
1,117.83
23,474.43
Margaret Hoe
22,944.00
1,147.20
24,091.20
Casius Morok
27,465.00
1,373.25
28,838.25
Anna Moi
23,496.00
1,174.80
24,670.80
Jacob Nomeri
22,097.00
1,104.85
23,201.85
Tonny Dick
24,025.50
1,201.28
25,226.78
Kaigo Neknek
32,787.00
1,639.35
34,426.35
John Tumun
33,612.00
1,680.60
35,292.60
Elizah Otto
23,080.00
1,154.00
24,234.00
Reuben John
38,928.47
1,946.42
40,874.89
Andrew Palma
21,750.00
1,087.50
22,837.50
Paul Karua
22,305.00
1,115.25
23,420.25
Diana Kepas
23,310.00
1,165.50
24,475.50
Dickson Mulu
36,296.00
1,814.80
38,110.80
Joyce Kami
29,996.20
1,499.81
31,496.01
Roka Gaima
21,179.00
1,058.95
22,237.95
Thomas Kagl
35,794.00
1,789.70
37,583.70
Isaac Oisima
26,305.00
1,315.25
27,620.25
Abigail Bigea
23,030.00
1,151.50
24,181.50
Casper Beiyo
27,034.85
1,351.74
28,386.59
Andrew Palinga
23,114.00
1,155.70
24,269.70
Marcelus Morok
27,585.50
1,379.28
28,964.78
Rebecca Kaipo
27,898.80
1,394.94
29,293.74
Solanus Masai
24,506.80
1,225.34
25,732.14
Joachim Kais
26,305.00
1,315.25
27,620.25
John Kari
23,789.00
1,189.45
24,978.45
Maria Igum
18,865.60
943.28
19,808.88
Lina Sazaka
26,705.00
1,335.25
28,040.25
Veronica Siune
34,263.00
1,713.15
35,976.15
Joe Munvi
39,910.05
1,995.50
41,905.55
Reuben Baita
19,984.74
999.24
20,983.98
Rebecca Michael
26,300.00
1,315.00
27,615.00
Total
2,891,582.58
144,579.13
3,036,161.71

Judgment accordingly.
_______________________________________________________________
GP Lawyers: Lawyers for the plaintiffs
Solicitor-General: Lawyer for the First, Second, Third & Seventh Defendants



PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/pg/cases/PGNC/2018/28.html