You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Supreme Court of Samoa >>
2024 >>
[2024] WSSC 52
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Police v Vui [2024] WSSC 52 (2 July 2024)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
Police v Vui [2024] WSSC 52 (02 July 2024)
Case name: | Police v Vui |
|
|
Citation: | |
|
|
Decision date: | 02 July 2024 |
|
|
Parties: | POLICE (Informant) v TAVETE VUI a.k.a. TAVETE LAUANO SALELEA male of Puapua, Sapapalii and Falemauga (Defendant) |
|
|
Hearing date(s): |
|
|
|
File number(s): | Charge 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 per charging document dated 13 November 2023. |
|
|
Jurisdiction: | Supreme Court – CRIMINAL |
|
|
Place of delivery: | Supreme Court of Samoa, Mulinuu |
|
|
Judge(s): | Justice Fepulea’i A. Roma |
|
|
On appeal from: |
|
|
|
Order: | I grant the application. All charges are withdrawn and dismissed. You are also free to go. |
|
|
Representation: | I. Atoa for Prosecution I. Sapolu for the Accused. |
|
|
Catchwords: | Incest – sexual violation – unlawful sexual connection – attempted indecent assault. |
|
|
Words and phrases: | “Application to withdraw charges” – “victims recanted complaints and statements”. |
|
|
Legislation cited: | |
|
|
Cases cited: |
|
|
|
Summary of decision: |
|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
HELD AT MULINUU
BETWEEN:
P O L I C E
Informant
AND:
TAVETE VUI a.k.a. TAVETE LAUANO SALELEA male of Puapua, Sapapalii and Falemauga.
Defendant
Counsel: I. Atoa for Prosecution
I.Sapolu for the Accused
Sentence: 2 July 2024
RULING
(Application to withdraw charges)
- On the 13th November 2023 through former counsel Mr Chan Chui, you pleaded not guilty to 9 charges – 4 charges of unlawful
sexual violation, 4 of incest and one of attempted indecent assault.
- The victim of the unlawful sexual violation and incest charges is Olalupefueselela Tavete, your 15 year old biological daughter.
The victim of the one attempted indecent assault charge is your other daughter Apaula Tavete who is now 34 years of age according
to her statement before me.
- After Mr Chan Chui withdrew as counsel, you maintained your denial of all charges through your present counsel Ms Sapolu and the
matter was set for hearing today.
- Because of the risk of you interfering with prosecution witnesses who are your close relatives, and in particular your conviction
for Incest in 2008, prosecution opposed a bail application filed by your former counsel which you did not pursue through Ms Sapolu.
Instead, you sought the earliest available hearing date and have therefore remained in custody since the 25th October 2023.
- This morning in a memorandum by prosecution, they seek to withdraw all charges. The basis of the application is that the two victims
have recanted their complaints and statements of February and March 2023 from which police laid the charges.
- I have read the new statements by both victims. I am not at all convinced of the reason they claim as why they lied to police and
implicated you as the offender. There is obviously more behind a simple retraction of detailed complaints filed with police almost
a year ago. The question is, why have they left it this late to recant police statements alleging serious sexual offending against
their father and withdraw the charges, knowing full well that as a result, you have been held in custody since October 2023.
- Despite my very strong suspicions as to the real reason behind the change in the victims’ story and consequent application
by prosecution, I consider as prosecution has informed the court, that the prospects of securing a conviction have been significantly
affected.
- I have said earlier that this would be one of about five recent cases of serious sexual offending where prosecution have sought to
withdraw all charges on the basis of complainants recanting their complaints to police. I find that highly suspicious and cause
for serious concern that police and prosecution through the Attorney General’s Office must properly investigate and address.
- I note the advice by prosecution that the two victims have been referred to police to be charged.
- Coming back to the application, these proceedings have been a complete waste of resources and the court’s time for the reason
and manner they have been determined.
- I grant the application. All charges are withdrawn and dismissed. You are also free to go.
JUSTICE ROMA
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/ws/cases/WSSC/2024/52.html