PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Samoa

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Samoa >> 2024 >> [2024] WSSC 48

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

Police v Pitoitua [2024] WSSC 48 (18 June 2024)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
Police v Pitoitua [2024] WSSC 48 (18 June 2024)


Case name:
Police v Pitoitua


Citation:


Decision date:
18 June 2024


Parties:
POLICE (Informant) v TREVOR ALOESE PITOITUA male of Faatoia (Defendant)


Hearing date(s):



File number(s):
Charge 1, 2, 3 and 4 per charging document dated 18 September 2023


Jurisdiction:
Supreme Court – CRIMINAL


Place of delivery:
Supreme Court of Samoa, Mulinuu


Judge(s):
Justice Fepulea’i A. Roma


On appeal from:



Order:
I sentence you as follows:

(i) On the charge of possession of methamphetamine, you are convicted and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment;
(ii) On the charge of possession of marijuana, you are convicted and sentenced to 12 months imprisonment;
(iii) On the charge possession of a utensil, you are convicted and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment;
(iv) On the final charge of possession of ammunition without a permit, you are convicted and sentenced to 9 months imprisonment.
(v) All sentences will be served concurrently, time in custody to be deducted.


Representation:
J. Leung Wai for Prosecution
F. Ioane for the Defendant


Catchwords:
Possession of methamphetamine - Possession of utensil - Possession of loose marijuana leaves - Possession of ammunition without a permit.


Words and phrases:



Legislation cited:



Cases cited:



Summary of decision:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
HELD AT MULINUU


BETWEEN:


P O L I C E


Informant


AND:


TREVOR ALOESE PITOITUA male of Faatoia


Defendant


Counsel: J. Leung Wai for Prosecution
F. Ioane for the Defendant

Sentence: 18 June 2024


SENTENCE

Charge

  1. You appear for sentence on four charges. The first is possession of methamphetamine which attracts a life imprisonment penalty. The second is possession of narcotics, the maximum penalty is 14 years imprisonment. The third is possession of a utensil, the maximum penalty is 7 years imprisonment. The final charge is possession of ammunition without a permit, the maximum penalty is 2 years imprisonment. You had denied all except for the charge of possession of ammunition without a permit, but vacated your denials and entered guilty pleas on the 18th April 2024.

Offending

  1. On the 28th of August 2023, police received information suspecting your involvement in an alleged murder on the 23rd August 2023 at your home at Faatoia. Around 3.30pm when police arrived at your residence, your partner met them outside and told them you were not home. Police explained to her the reason for their presence and proceeded to conduct a search of your place. They found you inside your room. Outside the house, police also searched your vehicle in the presence of your partner and found ammunition, namely one (1) 22 live round calibre.
  2. Inside the house they searched the roof through an open manhole and found a silver bag. Inside the bag were 5 small zip lock bags containing methamphetamine that weighed 0.6 grams, one zip lock bag containing loose marijuana leaves weighing 0.69 grams, a clear glass pipe and white a straw. Police informed you of the ammunition and illegal substances and utensil, and administered caution before you were arrested and taken to their main Apia post.

Aggravating Factors

  1. I consider:

Mitigating Factors

  1. In mitigation of penalty I consider:

Penalty

  1. The rise of narcotics offending and hard drugs is a serious concern for our small community. I have referred in the previous sentencing matter to the highly addictive nature of methamphetamine and its destructive impact on users, their families and the community. The life imprisonment penalty imposed by law is a clear indication of the seriousness with which Parliament has viewed such offending. The court’s practice in imposing deterrent imprisonment sentences takes into accounts all those considerations.
  2. Prosecution recommend a start point of 2 years imprisonment uplifted by 12 months for your previous similar convictions. They produce a table of sentencing authorities for possession of methamphetamine, I have considered the circumstances of each case.
  3. Your counsel acknowledges the court’s stance on cases of methamphetamine and argues that 18 months is an appropriate start point, which is not far off from the 24 months recommended by prosecution. Your counsel refers to the same authorities cited by prosecution and distinguishes your matter on the basis of the quantities of the substances. I have carefully considered all those matters.
  4. I adopt 2 years as the appropriate start point on the lead charge of possession of methamphetamine, uplifted by 9 months for your previous related convictions. From that term I make these deductions. For the pleas for leniency by your partner and your mother, I deduct 6 months. For your guilty pleas to the charges, I deduct 9 months. The end sentence is 18 months’ imprisonment.

Result

  1. I sentence you as follows:

JUSTICE ROMA


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/ws/cases/WSSC/2024/48.html