You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Supreme Court of Samoa >>
2023 >>
[2023] WSSC 69
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Police v Siaosi [2023] WSSC 69 (2 November 2023)
SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
Police v Siaosi [2023] WSSC 69 (02 November 2023)
Case name: | Police v Siaosi |
|
|
Citation: | |
|
|
Decision date: | 02 November 2023 |
|
|
Parties: | POLICE (Prosecution) AND EMANUELE IOSEFO SIAOSI a.k.a. MANU SIAOSI male. (Defendant) |
|
|
Hearing date(s): |
|
|
|
File number(s): | Charging Document dated 31/07/23 |
|
|
Jurisdiction: | Criminal |
|
|
Place of delivery: | Supreme Court of Samoa, Mulinuu |
|
|
Judge(s): | Justice Nelson |
|
|
On appeal from: | |
|
|
Order: | - In respect of charges 1 to 4 of the Charging document you will be convicted and sentenced to 6 years in prison. - In respect of charges 5 to 8 of the Charging Document you will likewise be convicted and sentenced to 6 years in prison but that
is to be served concurrently. - - O lona uiga o le aofaiga o lou faasalaga i le toese mo mataupu uma nei e 6 tausaga e te nofo sala ai. Ae tatau na toese mai le 6
tausaga lena le taimi atoa lea sa e nofo taofia ai e faatalitali le faaiuga o lau Fa'amasinoga.
|
|
|
Representation: | E. Tiitii-Lam for prosecution K. Koria for defendant |
|
|
Catchwords: | - Sexual connection – digitally penetrating - |
|
|
Words and phrases: |
|
|
|
Legislation cited: | |
|
|
Cases cited: | |
|
|
Summary of decision: |
|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
HELD AT MULINUU
BETWEEN:
POLICE
Prosecution
AND:
EMANUELE IOSEFO SIAOSI a.k.a. MANU SIAOSI male.
Defendant
Counsel:
E. Tiitii-Lam for the prosecution
K. Koria for the defendant
Sentence: 02 November 2023
SENTENCE
- Because the victim in this matter is only 7 years of age I issue a permanent name suppression order together with an order prohibiting
publication of any details that may serve to identify her and that includes the name of her village.
- Emanuele has pleaded guilty to eight (8) counts of sexual assault of various kinds as detailed in the Police Charging Document dated
31st July 2023 as follows:
- (i) On or between 31st December 2021 and 1st January 2023, had sexual connection with the victim, a 7 year old by digitally penetrating her vagina.
- (ii) On or between 31st December 2021 and 1st January 2023, had sexual connection with the victim by digitally penetrating her vagina, knowing that she was induced to consent
to the connection by threat.
- (iii) On or between 31st December 2021 and 1st January 2023, had sexual connection with the victim, a 7 year old female, by digitally penetrating her anus.
- (iv) On or between the 31st December 2021 and 1st January 2023, had sexual connection with the victim by digitally penetrating her anus, knowing that she was induced to consent to
the connection by threat.
- (v) On or between 31st December 2021 and 1st January 2023, had sexual connection with the victim, a 7 year old female namely by licking her anus
- (vi) On or between 31st December 2021 and 1st January 2023, had sexual connection with the victim namely by licking her anus, knowing that she was induced to consent to the connection
by threat.
- (vii) On or between 31st December 2021 and 1st January 2023 had sexual connection with the victim, a 7 year old female by putting his penis into her mouth and perform oral sex.
- (viii) On or between 31st December 2021 and 1st January 2021, had sexual connection with the victim, namely by putting his penis into her mouth and perform oral sex, knowing that
she was induced to consent to the connection by threat.
- I accept however as submitted by counsel for the defendant that although there are eight (8) charges they only relate to two (2) incidents
of sexual assault.
- The Police summary of facts which has been accepted by the defendant through his counsel says that he is a 61 year old male, single
and was employed by the victim’s family. As such he resided and lived with the family. The victim as stated was at the time
of the offending 7 years of age and attending Primary School.
- Charges 1 to 4 of the charging document states that on a Sunday between 31 December 2021 and 01 January 2023 the victim’s family
were having their usual Sunday Toonai. On that Sunday the defendant dragged the victim to the toilet next to a Fale Samoa, undressed
her and inserted his fingers into her vagina. He also tried to insert his penis into the victim’s anus but was unsuccessful.
After that he inserted his fingers inside her anus and put it in his mouth.
- The summary says the victim was in pain and tried to scream but the defendant covered her mouth. The defendant threatened the victim
by telling her not to tell anyone about what he had done otherwise he will drown her in the river and this scared the victim. As
a consequence the victim told no one about what the defendant had done to her.
- Charges 5 to 8 of the Charging Document states that on another day during the same time period the defendant took the victim inside
a room of the house of the family. Where he undressed her and licked her anus. He then put his penis inside the victim’s mouth
and he performed oral sex on the victim.
- The summary says he ejaculated inside the victim’s mouth and covered her mouth so that the victim could not scream for help.
Like before he threatened the victim not to tell anyone about the incident and the victim complied.
- The offending only came to light in the course of an overseas trip when the victim revealed to her older cousins what the defendant
had done to her. The matter was reported to the Police by the victim’s caregiver grandmother resulting in the defendant being
apprehended and charges being laid against him. At first mention the defendant through his counsel entered guilty pleas to all the
charges.
- Both counsel accept that sentencing for this kind of case falls within the Bands established by the Court of Appeal in Attorney General v Lua [2016] WSCA 1. Further the aggravating factors in this matter include the vulnerability of the victim, her very young age and the large age disparity
between the parties.
- There is also the aspect of pre-meditation because the defendant as a member of the family would have been well aware of the movements
of the members of the family and when the young girl would likely be alone. There is also the fact that this offending occurred in
the victim’s home where she is entitled to feel safe and protected from this kind of behaviour. There is also the issue of
the breach of trust in the Samoan context because the defendant is an older male living in the family and older males are generally
required to protect the younger females of a family.
- The victim impact report filed reveals the impact on the victim has been profound. Her home environment in Samoa where she was under
the care of her grandmother has been shattered and she has been re-settled in Australia with other relatives. Where she is undergoing
counselling and therapy. There has been a considerable emotional toll on her as well as substantial physical costs incurred by the
family as a result of the defendants offending.
- There is no doubt that the effects of this kind of offending on one so young will take time to manifest. Equally there is no doubt
that her life and mental well-being have been greatly affected by the defendants offending. The court does also not overlook the
fact that the offending was accompanied by threats of violence.
- Counsels agree that the defendants offending falls within the mid-range of Band B-2 of Lua. In other words, somewhere between 5 to 12 years imprisonment. Counsels submit a start point of 8 years in prison is applicable but
given the large number of serious aggravating factors present in this matter I will apply a 10 year start point for sentence.
- I bear in mind in terms of our Sentencing Act 2016 the sentence must hold the defendant accountable for the harm he has done to the victim as well as to the community at large. Further
the sentence must denounce his conduct and in particular serve a deterrence purpose. In cases involving sexual violence against children
under 18 the court must also pay due regard to section 8 of the Sentencing Act 2016 which lists factors which except for 8 (e) are all present in this matter.
- As stated by this court in Police v MF [2022] WSSC 58 at paragraph 9, in an effort to combat the rising tide of sexual offending on young children by the males of this country Parliament
increased penalties for sexual connection. The court there restated how sentences must hold people who commit this kind of offence
on young girls accountable for their actions and must deter offenders from repeating this kind of conduct and send a message to other
young men of this country. It should also send a message to the old men of this country.
- From the start point of 10 years in prison as your counsel has ably pointed out you are entitled to deductions to reflect certain
matters. Firstly for your clean record and previous good character; and for these purposes I accept what your counsel advances in
his submission as to your background circumstances. A full deduction for this of 6 months will apply.
- For the remorse apology and reconciliation that has been effected with the victim’s family, and I accept you could not participate
personally in those because you were in custody, a further 6 months will be deducted from your sentence. After making those two deductions,
leaves a balance of 9 years in prison.
- For an early guilty plea offenders are normally given a further 25% deduction as the guilty plea has saved the courts and the prosecution
and everyone precious time and the courts limited resources. But in this case your guilty plea means a 7 year old does not have to
return to Samoa to testify and relive these sad incidents. For one as young as this young girl that would be a significant ordeal.
I will therefore increase the deduction for your guilty plea to one-third of the remaining balance, in other words a period of 3
years, leaves a balance of 6 years in prison.
- In respect of charges 1 to 4 of the Charging document you will be convicted and sentenced to 6 years in prison.
- In respect of charges 5 to 8 of the Charging Document you will likewise be convicted and sentenced to 6 years in prison but that is
to be served concurrently.
- O lona uiga o le aofaiga o lou faasalaga i le toese mo mataupu uma nei e 6 tausaga e te nofo sala ai. Ae tatau na toese mai le 6 tausaga
lena le taimi atoa lea sa e nofo taofia ai e faatalitali le faaiuga o lau Fa'amasinoga.
JUSTICE NELSON
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/ws/cases/WSSC/2023/69.html