Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Supreme Court of Samoa |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
Police v Ualesi [2022] WSSC 70 (17 August 2022)
Case name: | Police v Ualesi |
| |
Citation: | |
| |
Decision date: | 17 August 2022 |
| |
Parties: | POLICE v DUNCAN APIU TUALA UALESI male of Nono’a Saleimoa |
| |
Sentencing date(s): | 17 August 2022 |
| |
File number(s): | |
| |
Jurisdiction: | Criminal |
| |
Place of delivery: | Supreme Court of Samoa, Mulinuu |
| |
Judge(s): | JUSTICE TAFAOIMALO TUALA-WARREN |
| |
On appeal from: | |
| |
Order: | - He is therefore convicted of causing grievous bodily harm and sentenced to 10 months imprisonment. |
Representation: | I Tanielu for Prosecution Accused Unrepresented |
| |
Catchwords: | one charge of being armed with a dangerous weapon; one charge of causing serious bodily injury with intent. |
| |
Words and phrases: | the accused hit the victim with a stone on the head 3 times; the victim sustained a fractured jaw and a swollen face; he was drinking
Rover vodka at the time of the offending; Pursuing the victim as he ran away; The use of a rock; He attacked the head of the victim
while he was unconscious and defenceless; The extent of the injuries sustained by the victim and its long term effects as the father
of the victim has said his son is slower in his responses; Voluntarily turning himself into Police; |
Legislation cited: | |
| |
Cases cited: | Tele’a v National Prosecution Office [2017] WSCA 4 (31 March 2017); |
| |
Summary of decision: | |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
HELD AT MULINUU
BETWEEN
P O L I C E
Prosecution
A N D
DUNCAN APIU TUALA UALESI male of Nono’a Saleimoa.
Accused
Counsel: I Tanielu for Prosecution
Accused Unrepresented
Sentence: 17 August 2022
S E N T E N C E
The charges
The offending
The accused
The victim
Aggravating features of the offending
Mitigating Factors
Discussion
27. Taueki was a significant decision both for its methodology and for the guideline bands it provided. The methodology was usefully summarised in Attorney General v Matalavea at [15] as follows:
In order to compare this case with others we adopt the now conventional approach of identifying a starting point for the conduct, viewed objectively without reference to Mr Matalavea’s personal circumstances, before turning to those factors as well as others relied on in mitigation.
28. For intentional grievous bodily harm, the starting point in Taueki was to be taken from a system of three bands of ascending seriousness:
(a)Band one: 3-6 years;
(b)Band two: 5-10 years;
(c) Band three: 9-14 years.
29. Explaining Band One, the Court in Taueki said this:
Band one [36] This band will be appropriate for offending involving violence at the lower end of the spectrum of GBH offences. It is not an appropriate band for offences of extreme violence or violence which is actually life threatening. We have set the lowest starting point in this band at three years for the reasons (and subject to the qualification) set out at [27] above. Where none of the aggravating factors referred to in [31] are present, a starting point at the bottom end of this band would normally be called for. Where one or more of those factors is present, a higher starting point would be required.
Sentence
JUSTICE TUALA-WARREN
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/ws/cases/WSSC/2022/70.html