You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Supreme Court of Samoa >>
2017 >>
[2017] WSSC 135
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Police v Falatea [2017] WSSC 135 (3 July 2017)
THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
Police v FALATEA [2017] WSSC 135
Case name: | Police v Falatea |
|
|
Citation: | |
|
|
Ruling date: | 03 July 2017 |
|
|
Parties: | POLICE (Prosecution) v SIULI TUPUOLA FALATEA male of Siufaga-Falelatai and Nuu-fou. Accused |
|
|
Hearing date(s): |
|
|
|
File number(s): | S769/17 and S770/17 |
|
|
Jurisdiction: | Criminal |
|
|
Place of delivery: | The Supreme Court of Samoa, Mulinuu |
|
|
Judge(s): | Justice Leiataualesa Daryl Clarke |
|
|
On appeal from: |
|
|
|
Order: | Convicted in respect of both charges before the Court and sentenced to 12 months supervision on the following conditions: (i) attend a 6 weeks alcohol program conducted by the Samoa Victim Support Group; (ii) not to consume any alcohol for the next 6 months; and (iii) not to re-offend. |
|
|
Representation: | O. Tagaloa for Prosecution Accused self represented |
|
|
Catchwords: | Theft - burglary |
|
|
Words and phrases: | Make the most of this opportunity - because it will not happen twice |
|
|
Legislation cited: | |
|
|
Cases cited: |
|
|
|
Summary of decision: |
|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
HELD AT MULINUU
BETWEEN
P O L I C E
Prosecution
A N D
SIULI TUPUOLA FALATEA male of Siufaga-Falelatai and Nuu-fou
Accused
Counsel:
O. Tagaloa for Prosecution
Accused self represented
Decision: 03 July 2017
ORAL SENTENCING DECISION OF CLARKE J
- Siuli, you appear for sentencing on two charges as follows:
- (i) one count of burglary pursuant to section 174 of the Crimes Act 2013 which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment; and
- (ii) one charge of theft pursuant to 161 and 165(c) of the Crimes Act 2013 which carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment.
- According to the prosecution summary of facts which you have admitted, on the 23rd May 2017 about 2.30am, you went to the complainant’s house while they were sleeping. You went to the back of the house and
removed louvers of one of the rooms. You then entered the complainant’s house without his lawful authority and stole a Sumsung
J5 mobile phone valued at $759.00. You then left the house through the back door and fled.
- You are a 25 year old male of Faleula. You are unmarried and are unemployed. You grew up at Faleula and you are the 6th of 9 children. You completed your education at year 10. According to the pre-sentence report, you had various jobs including a bbq
eatery at Vaitele followed by a Japanese water tank company. Since that company returned to Japan, you have remained at home and
are unemployed.
- The complainant is a 36 year old male of Faleula and Malie. He is employed at the Ministry of Education Sports and Culture. According
to the pre-sentence report, your family has apologized to the complainant. The complainant appreciates the steps that your family
has taken to reconcile with them. I assume you did not attend because you have been held in custody. But it seems from the pre-sentence
report that the complainant would value an apology from you.
- The aggravating features of your offending are as follows:
- (i) First you entered the victim’s home whilst they were all asleep at 2.30am in the morning, an unlawful entry;
- (ii) Two, premeditation.
- Mitigating features, there are none. Aggravating in respect of you as an offender there are none also. In respect of the mitigating
factors personal to you as an offender I take the following on board:
- (i) is your remorse as indicated through the pre-sentence report;
- (ii) is your prior good character;
- (iii) is your early guilty plea; and
- (iv) finally is the apology to the complainant made through your family.
- Siuli, the charge of burglary for which you have pleaded guilty is a very serious charge. It carries a penalty of up to 10 years imprisonment.
And part of the reason that it is a serious offence is because in your case, you entered the home of the victim whilst they slept.
Those types of offending give rise to feelings of insecurity by the victims and they feel violated by the fact that you’ve
been inside their home at night. And often, that sense of insecurity goes well after you have left the house. Your action on this
night was clearly that of a fool but you are fortunate that you have a supporting family. That is important for you because I also
have no doubt that you offending has disappointed your family.
- You must be quite clear Siuli that if you re-appear before the Court on a similar type of offence, you will most likely receive a
custodial sentence. You have spent some time up at Tafaigata so you know what it is like in prison. And you have told me that there
is no future for you there and I agree with you. So you make the most of the opportunity that you will be given today because it
will not happen twice.
- Now in all the circumstances, I take into account your offending as a whole the aggravating and mitigating factors of your offending
and those personal to you as an offender, you are convicted in respect of both charges before the Court and sentenced to 12 months
supervision on the following conditions:
- (iv) You are to attend a 6 weeks alcohol program conducted by the Samoa Victim Support Group;
- (v) you are not to consume any alcohol for the next 6 months; and
- (vi) you are not to re-offend.
- Make the most of this opportunity Siuli.
JUSTICE CLARKE
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/ws/cases/WSSC/2017/135.html