PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Samoa

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Samoa >> 2016 >> [2016] WSSC 64

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

Police v Tagoa'i [2016] WSSC 64 (11 March 2016)

SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
Police v Tagoa’i [2016] WSSC 64


Case name:
Police v Tagoa’i


Citation:


Decision date:
11 March 2016


Parties:
POLICE (prosecution) and SUITULAGA TAGOA’I male of Siusega and Lepa Aleipata (defendant)


Hearing date(s):



File number(s):
S2261/15, S2120/15


Jurisdiction:
Criminal


Place of delivery:
Supreme Court of Samoa, Mulinuu


Judge(s):
JUSTICE VAAI


On appeal from:



Order:
Discharged without conviction.


Representation:
L Sio for prosecution
Unrepresented


Catchwords:
Causing injury – armed with a dangerous weapon – provocation – aggravating features


Words and phrases:



Legislation cited:



Cases cited:



Summary of decision:


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
HELD AT MULINUU


BETWEEN:

POLICE
Prosecution


AND:


SUITULAGA TAGOA’I male of Siusega and Lepa Aleipata
Defendant


Counsel:
L Sio for prosecution
Unrepresented


Sentence: 11 March 2016


S E N T E N C E

  1. Defendant what you just told the court coincides with what you told the Probation Service as related in the probation report.
  2. There was a lot of provocation provided by the victim’s nephew by persistently throwing rubbish to your land. The only serious aggravating factor of your offending is the use of a knife. But you have told the probation service as well as the court the reasons why you were in possession of that knife, it was not for the commission of the offence, you were preparing food when the incident started.
  3. So I am satisfied that you were not in possession to commit any offence. There is no reason why the court should not impose the same sentence that was imposed on the victim and his nephew. But I am also told by the probation service that your wife is in Malaysia and you may wish to travel and that entering a conviction against you, may hamper your travel arrangement.
  4. You are 44 years of age, you have children and you have managed your journey through life without any previous conviction.
  5. So accordingly I will not enter any conviction in case you may wish to travel to Malaysia to see your family. You are discharged without conviction.

JUSTICE VAAI


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/ws/cases/WSSC/2016/64.html