You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Supreme Court of Samoa >>
2014 >>
[2014] WSSC 167
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Police v Leaumau [2014] WSSC 167 (25 August 2014)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
Police v Leaumau [2014] WSSC 167
Case name: | Police v Leaumau |
|
|
Citation: | |
|
|
Decision date: | 25 August 2014 |
|
|
Parties: | POLICE (Prosecution) VINI LEAUMAU, male of Vaipuna (Defendant) |
|
|
Hearing date(s): | - |
|
|
File number(s): | S608/14, S908/14 |
|
|
Jurisdiction: | Criminal |
|
|
Place of delivery: | Supreme Court of Samoa, Mulinuu |
|
|
Judge(s): | Justice Nelson |
|
|
On appeal from: |
|
|
|
Order: | You will be convicted on the charge of possession of marijuana S908/14 and sentenced to 4 years in prison. Any time in custody awaiting
sentence is to be deducted from that period. In respect of the other charge of possession of 332 seeds S608/14 convicted and sentenced to 2 years in prison. But that term is
to run concurrent to your other term so you will spend 4 years in prison minus your remand in custody time. |
|
|
Representation: | O Tagaloa for prosecution L R Schuster for defendant |
|
|
Catchwords: | - |
|
|
Words and phrases: |
|
|
|
Legislation cited: |
|
|
|
Cases cited: |
|
|
|
Summary of decision: |
|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
HELD AT MULINUU
BETWEEN:
POLICE
Prosecution
AND:
VINI LEAUMAU, male of Vaipuna.
Defendant
Counsel: O Tagaloa for prosecution
L R Schuster for defendant
Sentence: 25 August 2014
SENTENCE
- The defendant appears for sentence on a number of drug charges. Firstly S908/14 that on the 6th of February this year he was found in possession of ninety two (92) small plastic bags of loose leaves of marijuana plus ten (10)
branches of marijuana and one clear plastic bag of marijuana loose leaves. The police summary of facts says this was enough marijuana
to make 327 cigarettes approximately. He has also pleaded guilty to S608/14 which says that he was on the same date found in possession
of three hundred and thirty two marijuana seeds (332). He is a 29 year old male of Vaipuna single and has no children.
- On the day in question the police went to the defendants house to execute a search warrant for drugs. When they arrived at the house
about 4:00 pm they found the defendant and another man sitting on the front veranda. When the two men saw the police vehicle enter
their compound they ran off and police gave chase. The defendant was carrying two (2) bags. He was caught by police officers behind
his house and he threw away the bags. The police recovered the bag and the marijuana seeds and leaves were found in the bags.
- The defendant is said in the police summary of facts to have a record of previous convictions for similar offending. But this record
has not been produced before the court despite requests. His counsel has submitted that the defendant is not in the business of
selling marijuana. Although he has accepted that he is a user of narcotics.
- But the existence of the defendants record does not appear to be disputed and the considerable quantity involved in this case indicates
the defendant is involved in the drug trade. The court also notes that amongst the drugs found in his possession were three hundred
and thirty two (332) seeds. I have therefore come to the conclusion the defendant should be sentenced on the basis that he is a
drug dealer.
- The courts attitude to drug dealers should be well-known to this community by now. You involve yourself in the commerce of the narcotics
trade you are guaranteed to go to prison. Because drug dealers are at the core of the growing narcotics problem in our country.
That is why Parliament recently increased the penalty for marijuana possession from 7 to 14 years.
- Considering all relevant factors an appropriate start point would be 6 years in prison. Had your previous drug record been produced
that start point would have been upgraded appropriately but I cannot do such an upgrade in the absence of the record. I will therefore
commence sentencing at 6 years in prison.
- The main factor in your favour Vini is you have pleaded guilty and saved the courts time. I give you full credit for that I will
allow one-quarter of the penalty. That is a period of 18 months. That leaves a balance of 54 months. In relation to your pre-sentence
report you have a relatively good report and there are various testimonies attached to that report. In acknowledgement of those
matters I will deduct a further 6 months from the balance of your sentence leaves 48 months. There no other deductions you qualify
for Vini.
- You will be convicted on the charge of possession of marijuana S908/14 and sentenced to 4 years in prison. Any time in custody awaiting
sentence is to be deducted from that period.
- In respect of the other charge of possession of 332 seeds S608/14 convicted and sentenced to 2 years in prison. But that term is
to run concurrent to your other term so you will spend 4 years in prison minus your remand in custody time.
JUSTICE NELSON
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/ws/cases/WSSC/2014/167.html