Iriarte v Etscheit [1998] FMSC 6; 8 FSM Intrm. 263 (App. 1998) (5 March 1998)

FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA
SUPREME COURT APPELLATE DIVISION
Cite as Iriarte v Etscheit, [1998] FMSC 6; 8 FSM Intrm. 263 (App. 1998)

ISO NAHNKEN OF NETT SALVADOR IRIARTE,
MISAIL PADAHK, KINDINIANO LIGORIO, WALTER EKIEK,
HENRY PHILLIP, BELERINO PHILLIP, BERNARD JACK,
ENERIKO RODRIGUEZ, MASAUO SULDAN, SULIANA PANUELO,
EMILIANA MARTIN, NADIP CANTERO, PASTOR PHILLIP,
ANTONIO SULDAN, ALBON SULDAN, TERESITA DAMARLANE,
AUGUSTINE DAMARLANE, SULIANA (JULIE) REX,
CLAUDIO PANUELO, IOAKIN CANTERO, FELIX PEISO,
MARTINO RODRIGUEZ, ALPHONSO LAURTIN,
EMIEL ANAS, ENERIKO ANNES, ROMINI PANUELO, LINUS ACTOUKA
and HERCULANO KOHLER,
Appellants,

vs.

CAMILLE ETSCHEIT, ROBERT ETSCHEIT, SR.,
ESTATE OF LEO ETSCHEIT,
ESTATE OF ELLA ETSCHEIT JOUBERT,
ROBERT ETSCHEIT, JR., individually and in his capacity as Administrator,
PACIFIC MISSIONARY AVIATION, PONAPE ENTERPRISES CO.,
POHNPEI AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT, INC.,
CAROLINE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT CO.
and HEIRS OF FLORENTINE ETSCHEIT,
Appellees.

APPEAL CASE NO. P5-1996

ORDER DENYING PETITION

Rehearing Denied: March 5, 1998

BEFORE:

Hon. Richard H. Benson, Associate Justice, FSM Supreme Court
Hon. Martin G. Yinug, Associate Justice, FSM Supreme Court
Hon. Lyndon L. Cornelius, Temporary Justice, FSM Supreme Court*

*Chief Justice, Kosrae State Court, Lelu, Kosrae

APPEARANCE:

For the Appellants (Padahk et al.):
Charles Greenfield, Esq.
Micronesian Legal Services Corporation
P.O. Box 129
Kolonia, Pohnpei FM 96941

* * * *

HEADNOTE

Appeal and Certiorari - Rehearing
The court may summarily deny a petition for rehearing and order the mandate issue immediately when it has carefully considered all of the appellants' arguments and has neither overlooked nor misapprehended any points of law or fact. Iriarte v. Etscheit, [1998] FMSC 6; 8 FSM Intrm. 263, 264 (App. 1998).

* * * *

COURT'S OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The appellants, except for Iso Nahnken of Nett Salvador Iriarte, filed a petition for rehearing on February 3, 1998. We deny the petition. We have carefully considered all of the appellants' arguments and have neither overlooked nor misapprehended any points of law or fact. See FSM App. R. 40(a). A summary denial is therefore proper. Let the mandate issue immediately. FSM App. R. 41.

* * * *