PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of the Federated States of Micronesia

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of the Federated States of Micronesia >> 1996 >> [1996] FMSC 36

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

Berman v Santos [1996] FMSC 36; 7 FSM Intrm. 658 (App. 1996) (16 December 1996)

FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA
SUPREME COURT APPELLATE DIVISION
Cite case as Berman v Santos, [1996] FMSC 36; 7 FSM Intrm. 658 (App. 1996)


MARY BERMAN,
Appellant,


vs.


POHNPEI SUPREME COURT CHIEF JUSTICE EDWEL
SANTOS, on his own and in his official capacity,
and POHNPEI STATE GOVERNMENT,
Appellees.


_________________________________________________


APPEAL CASE NO. P6-1996


BEFORE:


Hon. Richard H. Benson, Associate Justice, FSM Supreme Court
Hon. Martin G. Yinug, Associate Justice, FSM Supreme Court
Hon. Ramon G. Villagomez, Temporary Justice, FSM Supreme Court*


*Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands


Rehearing Denied: December 16, 1996


APPEARANCE:


For the Appellant:
Mary Berman, Esq., pro se
P.O. Box 163
Kolonia, Pohnpei FM 96941


* * * *


HEADNOTE


Appeal and Certiorari - Rehearing
A summary denial of a petition for rehearing is proper when the court has ruled on those issues necessary to decide this appeal and has neither overlooked nor misapprehended any points of law or fact. Berman v. Santos, [1996] FMSC 36; 7 FSM Intrm. 658, 659 (App. 1996).


* * * *


COURT'S OPINION


PER CURIAM:


The appellant filed a petition for rehearing on December 2, 1996. We deny the petition. We have carefully considered all of the appellant's arguments and have neither overlooked nor misapprehended any points of law or fact. See FSM App. R. 40(a). We have ruled on those issues necessary to decide this appeal. A summary denial is therefore proper.


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fm/cases/FMSC/1996/36.html