PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Vanuatu

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Vanuatu >> 2024 >> [2024] VUSC 305

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Public Prosecutor v Paniel [2024] VUSC 305; Criminal Case 1102 of 2023 (8 October 2024)

IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU
(Criminal Jurisdiction)


Criminal
Case No. 23/1102 SC/CRML

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

v

GUENTIN PANIEL

(Defendant)


Before: Hon Chief Justice Vincent Lunabek


In Attendance: Ms Mathilda Kalang Stephen, Probation Officer
Defendant – Guentin Paniel in person


Cancellation of Community Work and Re-Sentence
of Defendant Guentin Paniel


  1. An application for cancellation of community work and re-sentence of Defendant Guentin Paniel was filed with an Affidavit in Support on the 1st of October 2024.
  2. The application was filed by Probation Officer, Mathildah Kalang Stephen under Section 58X of the Penal Code (the “Act”).
  3. In her Affidavit in support of the application Mathildah K. Stephen deposes to this effect:
  4. Guentin Paniel informed the Court the reason he did not comply with his community work agreement at the Port Vila Cemetery area was because he did not have lunch. He also said he was sick and stayed at home. He did little work at home. He helped his father building a small house at home.
  5. This application is made under Section 58X (2) and (3) of the Act. Section 58X provides:

58X VARIATION OR CANCELLATION OF SENTENCE OF COMMUNITY WORK


(1) An offender who is subject to a sentence of community work, or a probation officer, may apply in accordance with section 58ZA for an order under subsection (3) of this section on the grounds that-:


(a) there has been a change of circumstances since the sentence was imposed that would justify the variation or cancellation of the sentence; or


(b) having regard to any change in circumstances since the sentence was imposed and to the manner in which the offender has responded to the sentence, the continuation of the sentence is no longer necessary in the interests of the community or the offender.


(2) A probation officer may apply in accordance with section 58ZA for an order under subsection (3):


(a) if an offender who is subject to a sentence of community work is convicted of an offence punishable by imprisonment; or


(b) on the grounds that the offender has behaved in a manner described in any of paragraphs 58Z(1)(a) to (j).


(3) On an application under subsection (1) or subsection (2), the court may, if it is satisfied that the grounds on which the application is based have been established:


(a) vary the sentence by reducing the number of hours of work to be done; or

(b) cancel the sentence; or


(c) cancel the sentence and substitute any other sentence (including another sentence of community work) that could have been imposed on the offender at the time when the offender was convicted of the offence for which the sentence was imposed.


(4) In determining another sentence under paragraph (3)(c), the court must take into account the portion of the original sentence that the offender has not served at the time of the order.


(5) If the court cancels the sentence, the sentence expires on the date that the order is made or on any other date that the court may specify.


(6) If, after an offender is sentenced to community work, the offender is subsequently sentenced on another charge to a term of imprisonment, the sentence of community work must be cancelled from the date that the offender commences his or her sentence of imprisonment.


  1. Defendant Guentin Paniel had pleaded guilty to, convicted and sentenced on 9th October 2023 to 8 months imprisonment suspended for a period of 2 years and in addition, he was ordered to perform 60 hours of community work on one count of unlawful possession of cannabis, contrary to Section 2(62) of the Dangerous Drugs Act [CAP. 12] and one count of Domestic Violence, contrary to Sections 10(1)and 4(1)(f) of the Family Protection Act.
  2. The Affidavit of the Probation Officer, Mathildah K. Stephen established that Defendant Guentin Paniel did not comply with his community work agreement. The Affidavit also shows that Guentin Paniel’s parents wrote a complaint letter to the Probation Services of Defendant’s aggressive attitudes and behavior at home due to his continuous consumption of cannabis.
  3. The Court is satisfied that the grounds on which the application is based have been established.
  4. The Court noted and considered subsections (3)(c), (4), (5) and (6) of the Act above.
  5. The Court decided and cancelled the sentence of 60 hours of community work; the Court also cancelled the period of 2 years suspension of 8 months imprisonment sentence.
  6. The Court re-sentenced Defendant Guentin Paniel with an imprisonment sentence of 8 months with immediate effect. Defendant Guentin Paniel, this is your new sentence.
  7. You have 14 days to appeal your substituted sentence of 8 months imprisonment if you are unsatisfied with it.

DATED at Port Vila, this 8th day of October, 2024.


BY THE COURT


...........................
Hon. Chief Justice Vincent Lunabek



PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2024/305.html