You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Supreme Court of Vanuatu >>
2023 >>
[2023] VUSC 144
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Download original PDF
Public Prosecutor v Malili [2023] VUSC 144; Criminal Case 1073 of 2023 (21 July 2023)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU (Criminal Jurisdiction)
| Criminal Case No. 23/1073 SC/CRML
|
BETWEEN: | Public Prosecutor |
AND: | Glen Malili Defendant |
Date of PLEA: Date of Sentence: | 10th July 2023 21st July 2023 |
Before: | Justice Oliver Saksak |
In Attendance: | Mr Gregory Simeon for the Public Prosecutor Mr Lent Tevi for the Defendant |
SENTENCE
- Glen Malili pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful entry and to three counts of theft.
- These are very serious offences as unlawful entry (section 143 (1) ) carries the maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment where the
place is not used for human habitation. And theft (section 125 (a) ) carries the maximum penalty of 12 years imprisonment.
- The facts are simple. On 6th June 2023 the defendant unlawfully entered the Santo kindergarten at Sarakata school area with intention to steal. At the time he
stole a PNG Billum basket and a hard external drive.
- Earlier on 2nd June 2023 at Zeng Store, Luganville the defendant stole a mobile cellphone and at Sunshine store at Sarakata he stole another mobile
phone from a Digicel Direct Top- up Booth.
- The defendant was apprehended and questioned by the Police as a result of the CCTV camera footage at Zeng Store showing the defendant
stealing the phone from the cashier desk. He admitted to committing these offences.
- The offences of theft appears to me to be the lead offendings. They were repeated on 2nd June 2023 in 2 different shops. And four days later, theft was repeated at a school. The values of the items taken were not specified
or given. The repetitious acts of thefts indicate that the defendant is a habitual offender. He sold the phone he had taken from
Zeng store of VT 6,000.
- There are no mitigating circumstances for these offendings. But there are aggravating features as indicated through the facts. And
his pre-sentence report shows he was imprisoned in 2022 for 3 months for theft, unlawful possession of dangerous drugs and for breach
of a family protection order. So he is a repeat offender. He has not learnt or being deterred from his previous imprisonment.
- Taking all the aggravating features together with the serious offendings committed and his previous conviction, I adopt the following
sentences:-
- For unlawful entry- count 1- 2 years imprisonment
- For theft- Count 2- 2 years imprisonment concurrent.
- For theft- Count 3- 2 years imprisonment concurrent.
- For theft- Count 4- 2 years imprisonment concurrent.
The total concurrent sentence shall be 2 years imprisonment as a starting sentence with no further uplift.
- In mitigation I first deduct his sentence by 1/3 for guilty pleas, which is 8 months leaving the balance to be 1 year and 4 months
imprisonment.
- I have read his pre-sentence report showing his character and personal history. There are some negative aspects of his life, character
and attitude. I note he is a young man of now 20 years of age. He has shown some remorse by at least returning the phone he stole
from Sunshine store. And the police recovered a wool bag and black hard drive. I note he has been in custody on remand since 9th June 2023.
- I deduct a further 4 months leaving his end sentence to be exactly 12 months or 1 year in prison. This sentence will not be suspended.
- But his sentence is backdated to 9th June 2023 so he does not lose his parole privilege.
- Glen Malili you are convicted and sentenced to an end sentence of 12 months imprisonment as a concurrent sentence for all four offences
you committed. This sentence is to take immediate effect.
- You may appeal against the sentence if you wish, within 14 days.
DATED at Luganville this 21st day of July 2023
BY THE COURT
OLIVER.A.SAKSAK
Judge
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2023/144.html