You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Supreme Court of Vanuatu >>
2022 >>
[2022] VUSC 32
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Public Prosecutor v Massing [2022] VUSC 32; Criminal Case 93 of 2022 (3 February 2022)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU (Criminal Jurisdiction) | Criminal Case No. 22/93 SC/CRML |
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
V
ANNETH MASSING
Date of Sentence: 3rd day of February, 2022 at 2:30 PM
Before: Judge EP Goldsbrough
In Attendance: L Lunabek for the Public Prosecutor
B Livo for the Accused
SENTENCE
- Anneth Massing, you have pleaded guilty to the offence of possession of cannabis, in November 2021 in Port Vila when you were found
in possession of 11.42 grams.
- After being out socializing on Friday 5 November 2021, the next day your sister found the cannabis in a jam jar at your house and
gave it to your father who asked you what this was. You became angry with your father and an argument took place after which you
left the house, threatening to kill yourself. This behaviour continued and resulted in the police being called and your father reporting
you for the possession of cannabis. During this interaction, you attempted suicide.
- Following your arrest, on 7 November you admitted being in the possession of cannabis and also that you knew this to be illegal. You
have been in custody for this matter ever since that day, from 7 November 2021 until today, 3 February 2022.
- After you entered your guilty plea to this charge, a pre-sentence report has been prepared and your lawyer and the lawyer from the
Office of the Public Prosecutor have filed written submissions on sentencing. The Court is grateful that this has been done over
just two days, as everyone is conscious that you have already been in custody for a long time.
- The only aggravating feature said to exist in this case is the quantity of cannabis which is described as large. To describe 11.42
grams as large may be said to be an exaggeration but it is certainly more than the .58 of a gram also produced in another case today.
- As to mitigating features, you admitted this offence from your arrest, you pleaded guilty at the first opportunity, you have not previously
been convicted of any offence of any kind, you appear to have expressed remorse and you have already served an effective sentence
of imprisonment of six months.
- From what the Court has been told of your circumstances, you appear to be in need help rather than punishment. The Court has been
advised that you are welcome to return to live with your parents at Fresh Wota. The Court has been further advised that you are prepared
to co-operate with the Probation Service if you are made the subject of a supervision order.
- The offence of possession of cannabis usually results in a custodial sentence of some length, even if that term of imprisonment is
suspended. There is some disagreement as to whether the starting point for this offence should be between 12 and 15 months or 6 to
10 months. The Court has been referred to cases of a similar nature where both starting points have been applied, although the most
recent case features the lower range.
- The Court will not, in this case, determine a starting point simply because of the time already spent in custody. That time amounts
already to an effective immediate sentence of six months imprisonment. That is enough. As credit cannot be given for that time were
you to be given a suspended sentence today for this offence, the effective total period of imprisonment would, combined with the
time already served, be too harsh.
- Therefore, taking into account time already spent in the custody of the Correctional Services, the sentence for this offence is nothing
more than a supervision order for two years. During that time, you will live with your parents and will obey their rules, you will
co-operate with your probation officer and you will also visit the doctor who you have previously consulted and follow his or her
treatment instructions (if any). You will also be of good behaviour. Should either your parents or your probation officer have concerns
about your behaviour, you could be brought back to this court for failure to comply with the conditions of your supervision. If that
happens a different sentence may be substituted for this supervision order. You may not change the place where you live during
the Supervision Order without the consent of your Probation Officer.
- Your parents have given their consent to this order and you have told this Court that you understand the terms of this order and therefore
you are now made the subject of a two-year Supervision Order. The Probation Service will be in touch with you shortly to talk about
your situation and your first appointment with them. In addition, an order for the forfeiture and destruction of the illegal drugs
is made.
DATED at Port Vila this 3rd day of February, 2022
BY THE COURT
...........................
EP Goldsbrough
Judge of the Supreme Court
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2022/32.html