You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Supreme Court of Vanuatu >>
2022 >>
[2022] VUSC 176
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Download original PDF
Public Prosecutor v Anatu [2022] VUSC 176; Criminal Case 4021 of 2021 (11 October 2022)
IN THE SUPREME COURT Criminal
OF THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU Case No. 21/4021 SC/CRML
(Criminal Jurisdiction)
BETWEEN: Public Prosecutor
AND: Sano Koriaru Anatu
Accused
Date of Sentence: 11 October 2022
Before: Justice EP Goldsbrough
Appearances: Massing, K holding papers for Karae, T for the Public Prosecutor
Livo, B for the Accused
SENTENCE
- Sano Koriaru Anatu has admitted an offence of indecency without consent. The victim of this offending was Susan Busai with whom the
defendant used to live as husband and wife. That relationship ended more than six months before this offence took place. The facts
suggest that on 12 November 2021 when the victim came home from a night spent drinking and dancing, the accused Sano Anatu was already
at her home. He gave her more alcohol and she went to bed after drinking some of it.
- She woke up to find the defendant undressing her. He had already removed her outwear and bra and was trying to remove her underwear,
in particular her panties. She felt him touch her vagina through her panties. She scolded him. She noticed that he had made the room
secure from onlookers by closed curtains.
- The facts as set out in the statement of brief facts are admitted. No reason for the offending is given.
- The maximum penalty for an offence under section 98 of the Penal Code is imprisonment for seven years.
- Said to aggravate this offence is the fact that the defendant took advantage of his victim when she was drunk and in her own home.
It is difficult to see how premeditation and planning can be regarded as aggravating in this case as it appears the defendant seized
the opportunity when it was offered. He did draw the curtains which perhaps could be regarded as planning. If it is, it is not particularly
significant.
- A starting point of eighteen months imprisonment is set. The touching was through clothing, there was no actual penetration of any
organ by any part of his body and the offender did not attack his victim as a stranger might, they had been drinking together in
the house after she returned from a night out.
- The offender has pleaded guilty to his offence and deserves a reduction in sentence for that. He pleaded guilty at the first available
opportunity. He has no previous convictions and deserves some credit for that. He has already spent around 30 days in custody before
he was released on bail. He is entitled to have that period of custody taken into account.
- There is no indication that any customary reconciliation has taken place, only an indication that as he is employed, the offender
supports his family financially.
- Sexual offences are often dealt with by way of immediate custodial sentences, and there is authority from the Court of Appeal in that
regard. In particular see PP v Gideon [2002] VUCA 7. But this is not a case of the sexual abuse of a young person.
- Given the circumstances of this particular offence and the relatively minor interference with the health, safety and comfort of the
victim, this offence may fall outside of that category of offending requiring an immediate custodial sentence. Other indicators,
such as no history of offending and a good work record suggest that a sentence of imprisonment may be suspended.
- The starting point of eighteen months imprisonment is changed to reflect a guilty plea and the offender already having served thirty
days in custody to eleven months imprisonment. That eleven-month imprisonment is suspended for two years. This means that Mr Anatu
does not need to serve a term of imprisonment for this offence unless he is convicted within the next two years of any offence for
which he may be sentenced to imprisonment. If that happens, this suspended sentence may be put into effect. If he is not so convicted,
the sentence does not need to be served, so the way to stay out of prison is not to re-offend.
- Right of appeal explained.
Dated at Port Vila this 11th October 2022
BY THE COURT
.................................................
Justice EP Goldsbrough
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2022/176.html