PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Vanuatu

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Vanuatu >> 2021 >> [2021] VUSC 116

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Public Prosecutor v Natiang [2021] VUSC 116; Criminal Case 1095 of 2021 (25 May 2021)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF Criminal

THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU Case No. 21/1095 SC/CRML

(Criminal Jurisdiction)


PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

v

SAM JIMMY NATIANG


Date: 25 May 2021

Before: Justice V.M. Trief

Counsel: Public Prosecutor – Mr D. Boe

Defendant – Mr R. Willie


SENTENCE


  1. Introduction
  1. Mr Natiang pleaded guilty to one charge of act of indecency without consent. Mr Natiang is conv on his plea plea and the admitted facts.
  1. Facts
  1. The complainant is married to Mr Natiang’s older brother. At about 2pm on 31 December 2020, she was awoken in her kitchen by Mr Natiang touching her breast through her clothing. He demanded sex from her. She refused. He left.
  2. Mr Natiang made full admissions to the Police.
  1. Sentence Start Point and Personal Factors
  1. The sentence start point is assessed having regard to the maximum sentence available, and the mitigating and aggravating factors of the offending.
  2. The maximum sentence provided in s. 98(a) of the Penal Code [CAP. 135] for an act of indecency without consent is 7 years imprisonment.
  3. There are no mitigating factors related to the offending. The offending is aggravated by:
  4. Tangiat v Public Prosecutor [2014] VUCA 15 and Wenu v Public Prosecutor [2015] VUCA 51 are relevant guideline judgments. However, in light of the aggravating factors set out above, I consider 16 months imprisonment is the appropriate sentence start point.
  5. reduction is made for Mr Natiang’s early guilty plea.
  6. Mr Natiang is 31 years old, is in a de facto relationship and has four young children. His partner is expecting their fifth child. He has no previous convictions. Mr Natiang’s chief amilyamily performed a custom reconciliation ceremony on his behalf with the complainant and her family involving a fine of a pig, a mat, a stem of kava, 6-7 yad VT10,000 cash. I reduce the sentence by 3 months for Mr N Mr Natiang’s personal factors.
  1. End Sentence
  1. Mr Natiang is sentenced to 8 months imprisonment to rum from 12 April 2021 to take into account the time served in custody from 6 January 2021 to 18 February 2021 (44 days).
    <
  2. The >The sentence is suspended for 2 yearview of the facts fallifalling towards the lower end of the scale for this offence, Mr Natiang&#s past clean recorrecord anspects of rehabilitation.
  3. Intion, Mr Natiang is ordered to complete 100 hours of communommunity work.
  4. Mr Natiang has 14 days to appeal the sentence.

DATED at Luganville this 25th day of May 2021

BY THE COURT


.................................................

Viran Molisa Trief

Judge


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2021/116.html