You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Supreme Court of Vanuatu >>
2018 >>
[2018] VUSC 142
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Download original PDF
Public Prosecutor v Noal [2018] VUSC 142; Criminal Appeal Case 668 of 2018 (13 July 2018)
IN THE SUPREME COURT Criminal Appeal
OF THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU Case No. 18/668 SC/CRMA
BETWEEN: Public Prosecutor
Appellant
AND: Franco Noal and Karie Sandy
Respondents
Date: 13 July 2018
Before: Justice G.A. Andrée Wiltens
In Attendance: Mr P. Toaliu for the Appellant
Ms K. Karu for the Respondents
Judgment
- This was an appeal from a Magistrate’s Court decision to dismiss the case against the Respondents for lack of prosecution on
26 February 2018.
- The matter has some history. Both Respondents pleaded guilty to the charges they faced on 2 October 2017. Thereafter attempts to
deal with sentencing were thwarted, mainly due to non-attendance by one of both of the Respondents at various further scheduled appearances.
One sentencing date was arbitrarily vacated by the Magistrate for no obvious reason, which upset both counsel. Finally, when the
matter was again scheduled for sentencing, no notice of the date was provided to the prosecution; and when the matter was called,
the case was dismissed due to the absence of a prosecutor.
- Mr Toaliu appealed the case dismissal. Ms Karu for the Respondents conceded the appeal and agreed that the next step ought to be
to deal with sentencing.
- Accordingly the appeal is allowed. The matter will be called again at 8.30am on 27 July 2018. Both Respondents are to be formally
summonsed to attend to be sentenced – written submissions by both counsel are on file. The Respondents need to know that if
there is no appearance at 8.30am on 27 July 2018, a warrant of arrest will be issued – with the likely result being that they
will be arrested and remanded in custody until a new date for sentencing can be arranged. This warning is necessary as the delays
in concluding this matter are far too extensive, and they have to stop.
- If Pre-Sentence Reports are required, counsel will need to attend to that, as it is unclear whether the Magistrate ordered them.
Further, if a translator is required, counsel will need to advise the Court asap.
Dated at Port Vila this 13th day of July 2018
BY THE COURT
.................................................
Justice G.A. Andrée Wiltens
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2018/142.html