You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Supreme Court of Vanuatu >>
2017 >>
[2017] VUSC 118
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Download original PDF
Public Prosecutor v Naikapen [2017] VUSC 118; Criminal Case 1936 of 2017 (18 August 2017)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU
(Criminal Jurisdiction)
Criminal Case No. 1936 of 2017
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
-v-
SAMSON NAIKAPEN
Coram: V. Lunabek- CJ
Counsels: Mr Tristan Karae for Public Prosecutor
Ms Kylie Bakeo for the Defendant
Date of Delivery: 18th August 2017
sentence
- Samson Naikapen, this is your sentence. On 2 August 2017, you entered a guilty plea on one count of threats to kill a person contrary
to s.115 of Penal Code Act.
- On 25 April 2017, at IImansa nakamal, Tanna, you took a big knife (bush knife) and chased the complainant on the road.
- You told the complainant (Solomon Namri) that you would kill him by cutting him to death.
- During the time, police officers were accompanying Mr Solomon Namri (the complainant) on the vehicle when you chased them with the
knife and threatened to kill the complainant.
- The complainant, Mr Solomon Namri lodged the complaint against you for this offence of threats to kill him on 26 April 2017.
- On 27 April, you were arrested and detained. You were cautioned and interviewed. You made no admission to the offence as alleged against
you.
- The pre-sentence report reveals the following:-
You are 42 years of age. You originate from Tanna and currently you reside at Erakor Bridge with your brother. You agreed with the
Prosecution’s summary of facts. But you say you were never intended to harm your brothers. You were fixing the nakamal’s
roofing which required you using a knife and the fact that you had to jump of the roof with the knife in your hand must have mislead
your brothers to thinking you were going to cut them with the knife. You say you agreed with the fact that you were holding a knife
at that time, but after jumping of the roof, you were assaulted by other relatives. The report shows that your action is not a planned
action. There was a conflict within the family that was never resolved and had been standing for almost 6 years without resolution.
You were also victim of that conflict as you were also assaulted by your brothers.
- The prosecution submitted referred to Guideline Judgments for this type of offending: Walker –v- Public Prosecutor [2007] VUCA 12 in which the Court stated:
“Cases of this nature must always warrant imprisonment sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offence. For offence of threats
to kill a person, by a defendant with presence of weapon and the use of the weapon is on the higher scale of aggravation and seriousness.
A suspended sentence of imprisonment must only be granted if the circumstances of the case is justified”
- I read and take into account of what your lawyer says in her submissions on your behalf.
- This is a serious offence. It carries a maximum penalty of 15 years imprisonment.
- In the present case, the circumstances of this case are aggrevated by the following factors:
- The presence of a weapon/ bush knife when the threats occurred.
- You chased after the complainant with a knife.
- Police officers were present with the complainant at the time of offending - you show lack of respect for officers of the law when
the threat was carried out.
- You fear to the complainant and the accompany police officers for their lives.
- The prosecution submitted that an appropriate staring point should be 3 years inclusive of the aggravating circumstances.
- I sentence you to 2 years imprisonment as a starting point sentence.
- In mitigation, you are a first time offender. You pleaded guilty at the first opportunity given to you by the Court. I reduce your
sentence to one third for your early guilty plea. Your remaining term of sentence is 16 months imprisonment.
- You have performed custom ceremonies to the victims of your offending.
- In the first custom reconciliation ceremony you gave:
One pig, worth 20,000vt
Two stamba Kava blo 5 years
Three mats
One bundle Kaliko
- In the second custom reconciliation you gave:
One foul
One mat
One bundle Kaliko
One, pig worth 35,000vt
One stamba blo Kava for 5 years
- Your term sentence of 16 months is further reduced by 8 months making an end sentence of 8 months imprisonment.
- I consider the nature and circumstances of your offending, I decide to suspend your term of imprisonment of 8 months for 2 years.
I do order.
- In addition, you are ordered to perform 80 hours community work.
- You have 14 days to appeal this sentence if you are unsatisfied with it.
DATED at Port Vila, this 18th day of August, 2017
BY THE COURT
V. LUNABEK
Chief Justice
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2017/118.html