PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Vanuatu

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Vanuatu >> 2016 >> [2016] VUSC 172

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Hapihapat v Vutikwirinavanua [2016] VUSC 172; Judicial Review 1830 of 2016 (17 October 2016)

IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU
(Civil Jurisdiction)
Judicial Review
Case No. 16/1830 SC/JUDR

BETWEEN:
ABEL VINBEL HAPIHAPAT
Claimant

AND:

AND:
ALICTA VUTIKWIRINAVANUA
First Defendant
REPUBLIC OF VANUATU
Second Defendant

Coram: Justice Mary Sey
Counsel: Mr. Brian Liv the ClaimClaimant
Ms. Jelinda Toa for the Defendant
Date of Decision: 17 October 2016


RULING


This case concerns thesal of the National Coordinordinator of Land Dispute Management to grant the Claimant a Certificate of Registered Interest in land in respect of land located within the Ameliah Customary boundary and Alahamo customary land boundary.

The Claimant’s application is for judicial review to quash the refusal decision of 27th April 2016 given by the First Defendant in his capacity as the National Coordinator of Land Dispute Management. The application is opposed.

Upon Reading the papers filed and having heard and considered the submissions of counsel, I reject the submissions of defence counsel and hereby make the following quashing and mandatory Orders:

  1. The National Coordinator’s refusal decision of 27th April 2016 to grant the Claimant a Certificate of Registered Interest in land in respect of land located within the Ameliah customary boundary and Alahamo customary land boundary is hereby quashed.
  2. The National Coordinator is hereby ordered within 14 days from today to issue to the Claimant a Certificate of Registered Interest in respect of land located within the Ameliah customary boundary and Alahamo customary land boundary as declared by the Nakamal meeting of 10 March 2016 at Leviamp 1 Village.
  3. Section 19 (2) of the Custom Land Management Act provides an avenue for challenging an improperly recorded interest in land.
  4. The Claimant is awarded standard costs to be taxed by the Master if not agreed.

DATED at Port Vila this 17th day of October, 2016

BY THE COURT

Copy of DOC070113[1]

...........................

M. M. SEY

Judge



PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2016/172.html