PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Vanuatu

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Vanuatu >> 2014 >> [2014] VUSC 101

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Public Prosecutor v Filfil [2014] VUSC 101; Criminal Case 110 of 2014 (22 August 2014)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU
(Criminal Jurisdiction)
Criminal Case No. 110 of 2014


PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


V


MICHAEL FILFIL


Coram: Mrs. Justice M.M.Sey


Counsel: Mr. Ken Massing for Public Prosecutor
Ms. Jane Tari for the Defendant


Date: 22nd August 2014


SENTENCE


  1. On the 18th day of August 2014, the defendant Michael Filfil was convicted by this Court after he entered a guilty plea upon one count of unlawful possession of cannabis contrary to section 2(62) of the Dangerous Drugs Act [CAP 12].
  2. No dispute is taken as to the summary of facts tendered by the prosecutor and the defence concedes to the said facts.

3. The Court had ordered a pre-sentence report to be prepared on the defendant and this Order was complied with. I am grateful to the correctional services for its assistance in this regard.


4. I have also found the sentencing submissions filed by the prosecutor and the defence submission on mitigation and sentence quite helpful.


5. Having perused the pre-sentence report, I note that the defendant is 18 years old and that he dropped out from year 9 at Aore School. He was born in Luganville and had lived in Santo for most of his life. He was adopted by his aunt Mrs. Sandra Rarua after his mother passed away with cervical cancer last year.


6. The pre-sentence report goes on to show that the defendant is generally of good character and that he was influenced by his peers at the time of the offending. The report also assesses the defendant's behaviour as lacking adequate parental support but that he stands a chance of rehabilitation.


7. The Court further notes that Mr. Filfil spent part of 2012 and the whole of 2013 at the Youth Challenge Centre in Luganville participating in work experiences. In relation to his status in his community, the defendant poses basic carpentry skill and he is a member of the Seventh Day Adventist and he attends church regularly. He is also a skilful football player and he plays for his club Seveners FC.


8. I have also taken into consideration a number of mitigating factors, namely:


  1. The defendant is a first time offender with no prior convictions.
  2. He pleaded guilty to the offence at the first given opportunity which is a sign of remorse and contrition.
  1. The defendant co-operated well with the police during their enquiry.
  1. His mother died last year and his father deserted him which has resulted in him living with his aunt at Sarakata Dark Corner.

9. I have been referred to the guideline case of Public Prosecutor v Tuk Sope (2004) VUCA in which the defendant was sentenced to 3 months imprisonment but suspended for 12 months. On appeal, the Court of Appeal did not interfere with the sentence and it also upheld the suspended sentence.


10. It is the submission of defence counsel that the circumstances in the Sope case are distinguishable from the circumstances in this present case where the quantity of cannabis with a weight of 3.040 grams is much less than that of Sope which was 9.55 + 0.80 grams.


11. In arriving at my sentence, I have considered all the aggravating and mitigating factors presented in the pre-sentence report and the submissions and I have reached the conclusion that this case can appropriately be dealt with by a sentence of community work.


12. In the circumstances, Michael Filfil, you are hereby sentenced to carry out 60 hours community work coupled with supervision. You are also to undertake "Niufala Rod Prokram."


13. The said sentence recognizes your early guilty plea. Nonetheless, you are neither to re-offend in this manner nor commit any other criminal offence from now on.


14. You have 14 days within which to file a notice of appeal against this sentence if you do not like it.


15. The Court also hereby Orders that the cannabis found in the defendant's possession be condemned in accordance with section 18(1)(b) of the Dangerous Drugs Act [CAP 12].


DATED at Luganville, Santo this 22nd day of August 2014.


BY THE COURT


M.M.SEY
Judge


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2014/101.html