PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Vanuatu

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Vanuatu >> 2001 >> [2001] VUSC 48

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Public Prosecutor v Namuli [2001] VUSC 48; Criminal Case No 012 of 2001 (10 May 2001)

IN THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU

ass="MsoNoMsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 1; margin-bottom: 1"> (Criminal Jurisdiction)

Criminal Case No. 12 of 2001

ass="MsoNoMsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 1; margin-bottom: 1"> PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

lass="MsoNoMsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 1; margin-bottom: 1"> –v-

Mr. Terry Gardner for the Prosecution

Mr. Stephen Joel for the defendant

SENTENCE

Jeffrey Namuli was charged for Indecent Assault an offence against Section 98 (1) of the Penal Code.

Jeffrey Namuli of Tanna island that sometimes on the 21stst of April 2001 his mother sent him to go to the shop and on his way to the shop he noticed the defendant as he was drunk and he could smell liquor. He went close to the defendant and by that time the defendant grabbed him and he pulled him into the house. Tasso wanted to run away but the defendant took him into the house. He than made Tasso lay down, then he put his penis into Tasso’s anus. Tasso could not cry out as he was in fear that he will be assaulted if he shout. By that time somebody who was looking into the house saw what was happening. When the defendant realised that somebody was looking into the house he than let go Tasso. Later Tasso reported the matter to his mother and the other person who saw them, also told his mother of what he saw. The matter was reported to the police and he was arrested and brought to the police station where an interview was conducted and he admitted what he did to Tasso.

As to prior convn, the defendant had no similar prior conviction. Ter. Terry Gardner advances that a deterrent penalty should be imposed to punish the defendant and also to deter the public. Stephen for the defendant advances that he is 49 years old, had 5 children and at that time he committed the offence he was drunk after drinking kava with friends and later drank a middle size bottle of whisky until morning. He was sorry for what he did, he admitted to the police what he did. He advances further that even though a sentence of imprisonment to be imposed there should be some leniency as to the period that will be imposed. The defendant has spent two weeks in custody.

I prisoner's case the maximum penalty for the offence under section 98 (1) of the Pena Penal Code is 10 years in jail and this shows that the offence that he has committed is a serious offence and the Court should impose a custodial sentence as a form of deterrence to the society at large and also to punish him for what he did to Tasso which was against the law. In his case he indecently assaulted a male person of the same sex who was 11 years old at that time. No injuries caused. Nevertheless, that does not prevent this Court for imposing a custodial sentence on him as a punishment. In his case I will impose a sentence of nine months as a punishment. This period of sentence I consider to be the appropriate penalty to measure the seriousness of the crime he committed. Therefore, the defendant is convicted and sentence to nine months imprisonment.

Dated at Port Vila, this 10up> day of May, 2001.2001.

lass="Mss="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 1; margin-bottom: 1"> R. MARE

JUDGE.


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUSC/2001/48.html