PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Court of Appeal of Vanuatu

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Court of Appeal of Vanuatu >> 2020 >> [2020] VUCA 21

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Kalsakau v Director of Lands [2020] VUCA 21; Civil Appeal Case 2396 of 2019 (11 May 2020)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
OF THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU
(Civil Appellate Jurisdiction)

Civil Appeal
Case No. 19/2396 CoA/CIVA


BETWEEN:
McGLORY KALSAKAU representing FAMILY KALSAKAU

First Appellants


AND:
RUSSEL BAKOKOTO representing NAFLAK TEUFI

Second Appellants


AND:
VAVAUTALO SOPE representing FAMILY SOPE of Imere

Third Appellants


AND:
SAUWI KALPUKAI representing FAMILY NUNU NAPERIK MALA

Fourth Appellants


AND:
DIRECTOR OF LANDS

First Respondent


AND:
NATIONAL COORDINATOR OF THE CUSTOM LAND MANAGEMENT OFFICE

Second Respondent


AND:
ANDREW CHICHIRUA representing FAMILY GEORGE KANO

Third Respondent

Civil Appeal
Case No.19/1749 CoA/CIVA


BETWEEN:
FAMILY CHICHIRUA

Appellant


And:
HUMPREY TAMATA, NATIONAL COORDINATOR OF THE CUSTOM LAND MANAGEMENT OFFICE

First Respondent


And:
FAMILY GEORGE KANO represented by ANDREW CHICHIRUA

Second Respondent


AND:
FAMILY KALSAKAU and OTHERS

Third Respondents

Coram: Hon. Justice John William von Doussa

Hon. Justice Gus Andrée Wiltens

Hon. Justice Viran Molisa Trief


Counsel: Mr Sakiusa Kalsakau for the First, Third and Fourth Appellants

Mr Sammy Aron for the First and Second Respondents

Mr Jack Kilu for the Third Respondent


Date of Hearing: 11th May 2020


MINUTE


By application filed on 7 February 2020 the appellants in Civil Case No 2396 of 2019 applied to this court for clarification/review of the final judgment of the court in these appeals delivered on 15 November 2019. When the matter was called on Mr S Kalsakau for the appellants informed the court that upon reflection his clients considered that the matters which they had proposed to canvas before the court concerned a land transaction which occurred in about 1999, well before the legislation considered by the court in these appeals. The applicants therefore sought leave to withdraw their application.


The respondents raised no objection to the withdrawal of the application, and made a no application for costs.


The court granted leave to the appellants to withdraw their application.


DATED at Port Vila, this 11th day of May 2020


BY THE COURT


2020_2100.png
The Hon John von Doussa
Judge


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUCA/2020/21.html