Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Court of Appeal of Vanuatu |
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF
THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU
(Criminal Appeal Jurisdiction)
CRIMINAL APPEAL CASE No. 05 of 2004
BETWEEN:
THE HONOURABLE RIALUTH SERGE VOHOR,
Prime Minister of the Republic of Vanuatu
Appellant
AND:
THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent
Coram: Hon. Vincent Lunabek, Chief Justice
Hon. Daniel Fatiaki, J
Hon. Patrick Treston, J
Hon. Oliver Saksak, J
Counsel: Mr. Ronald Warsal and Mr. Willie Daniel for the Appellant
Mr. John William Timakata and Mr. Abel Kalmet for the Public Prosecutor
Mr. Sampson Endehipa, Attorney General and Mr. Tom Joe Botleng as Amicus Curiae
Date of hearing: 24th September 2004
Date of decision: 24th September 2004
ORAL DECISION
2. The matter will not be referred back to the Supreme Court because-
(a) We have grave doubts that what was said was a contempt of the Court although we are unanimous that it constituted personal abuse of the Chief Justice;
(b) Even if we were wrong on our assessment of whether the words said are contempt of the Court, nevertheless, we are unanimously of the view that the statement of the Prime Minster in the circumstances, are fully protected by Article 27(1) of the Constitution.
Dated at Port-Vila this 24th day of September 2004
BY THE COURT
Hon. Vincent LUNABEK, CJ
Hon. Daniel FATIAKI, J
Hon. Patrick TRESTON, J
Hon. Oliver SAKSAK, J
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUCA/2004/9.html