You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Supreme Court of Tonga >>
2024 >>
[2024] TOSC 23
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
R v Fanga [2024] TOSC 23; CR 25 of 2024 (23 April 2024)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TONGA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
NUKU’ALOFA REGISTRY
CR 25/2024
REX
-v-
Mosese Mafile’o UASIKE aka FANGA
Sentencing remarks
BEFORE : THE HONOURABLE COOPER J
Counsel : Miss Kafa for the Prosecution
Mr. Uasike was unrepresented
Date of : 23 APRIL 2024
THE ORDER OF COOPER J
DATE OF ORDER 23 APRIL 2024
THE COURT ORDERS
- Mr. Uasike is to serve a sentence of 8 months’ imprisonment, the last 4 months suspended for 1 year on conditions, back dated
to 12 March 2024.
- All drugs and paraphernalia are to be forfeited and destroyed.
- The TOP $200.00 seized is forfeited.
REASONS
- On 26 March 2024 at his arraignment hearing, Mr. Uasike pleaded guilty to a three count indictment.
(Count 1)
- Mosese Mafile’o Uasike of Kolomotu’a, on or about 20 September 2023, at Kolomotu’a, you did knowingly without lawful excuse, possess a Class A drug, when you had
in your possession 0.99grams of methamphetamine.
(Count 2)
- Mosese Mafile’o Uasike of Kolomotu’a, on or about 20 September 2023, at Kolomotu’a, you did knowingly without lawful excuse, possess 1 smoking glass utensil, 3 straws,
130 empty packs, 1 weighing scale, 1 bong can and 1 smoking utensil, used for packing and smoking illicit drugs.
(Count 3)
- Mosese Mafile’o Uasike of Kolomotu’a, on or about 20 September 2023, at Kolomotu’a, you did possess a .38mm ammunition
without a licence.
Background
- On 20 September 2023 at approximately 10.30 pm, Police Inspector Vi received intelligence that ultimately took him and colleagues
to Kolomotu’a, with the intention of raiding the home of Mr. Uasike.
- As they arrived in Kolomotu’s they received information directing them to the front of the hall of the Wesleyan Church.
- Officers observed a black motor car drop an individual in the vicinity of the hall, before departing, only to return shortly thereafter.
- While that vehicle remained stationary, Mr. Uasike approached it.
- Police officers intercepted, detained and secured him in handcuffs. As they did so he attempted to discard a vape. That was immediately
seized (exhibit 1.1A).
- He was searched and all that was found upon his person was TOP $200.00 cash (exhibit 2).
- Police Inspector Vi opened the rear of the vape, which was wrapped at one end with black tape and discovered inside 1 pack (exhibit
1.1A1), containing 5 packs with a white substance inside (exhibits 1.1A2-1.1A5, 1.2) and 1 pack also containing white substance (exhibit
2). Mr. Uasike was cautioned and asked about the contents of the vape, but he denied any knowledge of them.
- Mr. Uasike’s property was then searched by police assisted by a police dog. The following items were recovered:
Quantity | Items | Found by | Where it was found | Exhibit No. |
1 | Empty pack | Tomu | On top of a sideboard in the living room | 4 |
1 | Piece of straw | 5A |
1 | .38 ammunition | A box on top of the sideboard | 5 |
1 | Smoking pipe which had white powder residue | On top of a speaker beside the sideboard in the living room | 6 |
1 | Weighing scale | On top of a speaker in the living room | 7 |
1 | Piece of straw |
1 | A big pack containing 119 empty packs |
1 | A pack containing a white substance |
|
| 7.1 |
- He admitted these items were used by him for smoking. But, he stated the white substance was used as a cooking ingredient.
- The packets recovered from inside the vape were analysed and found to contain methamphetamine, as was the residue from the pipe, exhibit
6 and the contents of the packet seized from the top of the speaker in the living room, exhibit 7.1. They were all weighed:
Exhibit No. | Net Weight (grams) |
1.1A1 | 0.08 |
1.1A2 | 0.10 |
1.1A3 | 0.10 |
1.1A4 | 0.11 |
1.1A5 | 0.09 |
1.2 | 0.48 |
6 | 0.02 |
7.1 | 0.01 |
Pre-sentence report
- Mr. Uasike is 39 years old. He is married with three young children.
- He is of hitherto good character.
- Mr. Uasike lives at home with his children and his mother, who is unwell and depends on him.
- He works sporadically as a carpenter and gets some financial support from a sister who lives in New Zealand, though that is modest
and not regular.
- When confronted with the facts of these offences, Mr. Uasike admitted them to the probation officer. The impression he made was of
someone able to rehabilitate and accordingly should have a portion of his sentence suspended, with appropriate conditions to that
end.
Maximum sentences
- Possession of less than 1 gram of a Class a illicit drug contrary to section 4 (1) (a) (iii) Illicit drugs Control Act, the maximum
sentence is a fine not exceeding $10,000.00 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years, both.
- Possession utensils contrary to section 5 A Illicit drugs Control Act,, a fine not exceeding $10,000.00 or to imprisonment for a term
not exceeding 3 years, or both.
- Possession ammunition without a licence contrary to sections 4 (1) and (2) (b) Arms and Ammunition Act a sentence not exceeding 5 years.
Comparable sentences
Possession methamphetamine
- Starting with the case of Zhang v R [2019] NZCA 507 that revised the tariffs for methamphetamine offending set in R v Fatu [2005] NZCA 278; [2006] 2 NZLR 72 (CA).
- Lord Chief Justice Whitten KC in R v Paletu’a [2021] TOSC 49, approved that approach.
- The bands set are:
Band 1 | under 5 g | community penalty – 4 years |
Band 2 | under 250 g | 2 – 9 years |
Band 3 | under 500 g | 6 – 12 years |
Band 4 | under 2 kg | 8 – 16 years |
Band 5 | over 2 KG | 10 years – life. |
- R v Tevita Valikoula CR 205/20 Acting Chief Justice Tupou imposed a 9 month custodial sentence on a guilty plea to possession 1.68
g methamphetamine, 4 months of which were suspended on conditions.
- R v Petelo Moli CR 284/20 Lord Chief Justice Whitten KC imposed a sentence of 16 months fully suspended for possession 2.12 g methamphetamine.
- CR 131/2021 R v Fiefie, this Court imposed a starting point of 12 months’ imprisonment for possession 1.19 grams methamphetamine.
- This Court acknowledges that the weight of the drugs seized is an important factor in sentencing for offences involving possession
illicit drugs, but is not the sole factor.
Possession utensils
- R v Mahina & Wight, 93-94/2022. Mr. Wight was sentenced for possession of 4 straws, 3 sets of scales, a test tube and 112 dealer
bags. The court adopted a starting point of 1 year, having considered R v Ha’isila CR/ 22/2022.
- R v Namoa, Sekona & Finau 58, 59 & 61/ 2022 for 4 empty snap bags, and both counts of possession of a single test tube, a
starting point of 6 months.
Possession ammunition without a licence
- CR 279/2020 R v Poteki, possession of 2 rounds of 0.22 ammunition, a starting point of 1 months’ imprisonment.
- CR 294/2020 R v Creed (a.k.a. Kuliti) Tongamoa in respect possession of a quantity of 0.22 and 9 mm cartridges a sentence of 4 months’
imprisonment.
Crown’s indicative sentencing submission
- Count 1 a sentence in the range of 12-15 months with 5 months deducted for early guilty plea and his previous good character. The
final 4 months of his sentence to be suspended.
- Possession utensils, 9-12 months, with 3 months deducted the final sentence to run concurrent with count 1.
- Possession ammunition, a sentence of 1 month, concurrent to count 1.
Sentence
- Count 1, possession 0.99 grams methamphetamine, 12 months, reduced by 4 for his previous good character and early plea.
- Count 2 possession 1 smoking glass utensil, 3 straws, 130 empty packs, 1 weighing scale, 1 bong can and 1 smoking utensil 9 months
reduced to 6 to run concurrent with count 1.
- Count 3 possession two .22 rounds ammunition, 1 month, concurrent with count 1.
Suspension
- I have gone on to consider the principles in Mo’unga [1998] Tonga LR 154.
- Those principles are aimed at promoting rehabilitation.
- The key points being whether the defendant was young, of previous good character, or passed long time without offending; whether the
defendant would take the opportunity to rehabilitate.
- As mentioned in R v Wolfgramm & ors 35/2019, at paragraphs 46 to 49 and indeed, reiterated in R v Creed (a.k.a.) Tongamoa [1] supporting ones family, the so-called “bread winner” plea, is not of itself a basis for suspension.
- Because this was a first offence and his stated remorse, some of his sentence should rightly be suspended.
- Mr. Uasike is sentenced to 8 months’ imprisonment, the last 4 months suspended for 1 year on conditions, namely:
- he must not commit any offence punishable by imprisonment;
- notify probation within 48 hours of his release;
- reside where directed by his probation officer,
- he must complete a life skills and drug awareness course as directed by probation.
Conclusion
- 8 months’ imprisonment, the last 4 months suspended for 1 year on conditions.
- His sentence to be back dated to his first remand 12 March 2024.
- All drugs and paraphernalia to be forfeited and destroyed.
- The TOP $ 200.00.00 seized is to be forfeited.
SUPREME COURT | 23 APRIL 2024 |
NUKU’A LOFA | COOPER J |
[1] Ibid, paragraph 51.
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/to/cases/TOSC/2024/23.html