You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Supreme Court of Tonga >>
2021 >>
[2021] TOSC 53
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
R v Langi [2021] TOSC 53; CR 40 of 2021 (23 April 2021)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TONGA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
NUKU’ALOFA REGISTRY
CR 40 of 2021
R E X
-v-
TALIFOLAU LANGI
SENTENCING REMARKS
BEFORE: HON. JUSTICE COOPER
Counsel: Ms. ‘E. Lui for the Crown
Mr. ‘L’ was unrepresented
Date of sentence: 23rd April 2021
- An order prohibiting any publication of any details that could identify the victim in this case is made under s.119.
- Mr. ‘L’ pleaded three counts of carnal knowledge with a child relating to events in August 2020 when on three occasions
he had sexual intercourse with his then girlfriend Telesia Halangahu.
- This was a decision the two of them made together and what they both willingly wanted to do.
- There was nothing but affection and kindness between the two of them, as far as I can see.
- At the time they had sex Miss Halangahu was 14 but her birthday is 5th December. If they had waited another three months no offence would have been committed.
- She ran away from home to be with the defendant. That is what triggered the police involvement; coming about from her parents’
concern that she had left their house.
- I have before me a victim impact report, so called. As well as pre-sentence report and the prosecution submissions on sentence.
- The victim impact report turns out to be a misnomer. There was no victim here at all, perhaps only this defendant in being prosecuted
in the circumstances he was.
- Miss Halangahu stated to the report writer that sex had happened between the two of them willingly.
- This prosecution was not the wish of either her or her mother and came about of the police’s initiative.
- The pre-sentence report sets out for me the picture of a boy who is “obedient”, of exemplary character, respectful to
women, caring to his sisters and helps his father at the allotment and works hard there.
- I see that he attended a Life Skills Course and was spoken of highly by those that ran the course.
- I see that it also states that Miss Halangahu has tried to contact him but that he felt he should not be in touch with her.
- He should no longer feel like that.
- He is a fine young man and should be proud of all he has achieved and his father should be proud of him too.
- I have considered the guidance provided by United Nations[1] Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice, the so called Beijing Rules, where at paragraph 1.6 it is reiterated
that it should be a fundamental aim in promoting juvenile welfare to “...minimize the necessity of intervention by the juvenile
justice system...” [2]
- The nature and seriousness of the offending, the character of the defendant and I consider, in these circumstances, that it is inexpedient
to inflict punishment and a probation order is not appropriate.
- The only proper way to deal with this case is to completely discharge Mr. ‘L’.
- The effect of that, under section 204 (2) of the Criminal Offences Act is that he is deemed to be acquitted of the offence.
- He is free to leave and should be considered by all to have been effectively found not guilty.
NUKU’ALOFA N. J. Cooper
23 April 2021 J U D G E
[1] Tonga became a member state 14.9.1999
[2] Adopted by General Assembly resolution 40/33 of 29 November 1985
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/to/cases/TOSC/2021/53.html