PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Tonga

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Tonga >> 2000 >> [2000] TOSC 41

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

Fischer v Reisedienst Quick Tours Ltd [2000] TOSC 41; C 0021 1999 (8 December 2000)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TONGA
CIVIL JURISDICTION
NUKU'ALOFA REGISTRY


NO.C.21/99


BETWEEN:


KARL A. FISCHER
Plaintiff


AND:


REISEDIENST QUICK TOURS LIMITED
First Defendant


AND:


SVEN QUICK
Second Defendant


AND:


WALLTRAUD QUICK
Third Defendant


BEFORE THE HON. CHIEF JUSTICE WARD in Chambers.


Counsel: Mr V. Foliaki for Applicant
Mr S. Tu'utafaiva for Respondent


Date of Ruling: 8th December, 2000.


RULING


On 20 November 2000, I delivered a reserved judgment in this case in open court. I read the major part of the judgment and summarised the remainder. The concluding portion and the orders were part of the judgment read in full. I was reading from a printed draft from my computer because the judgment was still being set out in the standard layout, there having been delays resulting from problems with the court computers.


At the conclusion, I told counsel that they would receive their copies in the proper form before the end of the day and stated that, as my mathematics was always suspect, I would check the actual figures I had just given.


I was going abroad that evening but I was not given the judgment to sign before I left and it slipped my mind.


On my return, I signed the judgment and saw that Mr Niu for the defendants had filed submissions seeking, in effect, to open some aspects of the case. He prefaced his submissions with the sentence:


"In pursuance of directions given by this Court on 20th December (sic) 2000, the defendants make the following submissions in respect of the written judgment tentatively given by this Court on that day..."


I gave no such directions and in chambers Mr Tu'utafaiva for the plaintiff has the same recollection.


Neither do I accept that the judgment was tentative. It was final judgment and takes effect from the date of delivery, which was 20 November 2000.


This is not a case that is covered by the slip rule and I am now functus. In those circumstances, I must refuse the application. The defendants' remedy lies in appeal. I understand from Mr Foliaki that Mr Niu is abroad until 22 January. I shall give leave to file grounds of appeal by 16 February 2001.


NUKU'ALOFA: 8 December, 2000


CHIEF JUSTICE


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/to/cases/TOSC/2000/41.html