Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Land Court of Tonga |
BETWEEN : JEFFREY KENNEDY LOTAKI
- Plaintiff
AND : 1. CHURCH OF TONGA
- First Defendant
2. MINISTER OF LANDS
- Second Defendant
BEFORE JUSTICE NIU
Counsel: Mr. William Edwards for plaintiff
Mr. Sione ‘Etika for first defendant
Ms. Leotrina Macomber for second defendant
Date of hearing: On submission only by the plaintiff on 14 October 2019 and
by the first defendant on 21 October 2019, on application by
the first defendant to strike out the statement of claim of the plaintiff
Ruling: 29 October 2019
RULING ON APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT CLAIM
But it was subsequently amended by an Amended Notice of Application to Strike Out filed on 13 September 2019 to be based on only the ground (a), namely, that the statement of claim discloses no reasonable cause of action.
5. So that, as the present application of the first defendant is now only based on that ground, no evidence is allowed to be heard or referred to in support of the application. The application must be based and argued only upon what the pleading says. And in considering the application, the Court must assume that all the allegations contained in the pleading are true and that they can be proved at the trial to be true. If, after considering those allegations only, the Court considers that the pleaded cause of action or defence has some chance of success, then the Court will not strike out the pleading. If, however, the Court considers that the pleading has no chance of success at all, even if an appropriate amendment can be made to it, it must strike the pleading out.
had been removed from his father’s deed of grant had been unlawfully granted by the Minister to two younger brothers of his father, namely Lisione Lotaki and Daunibau Lotaki, and that they have each surrendered those lands and the Minister has granted
them to the Church of Tonga (the first defendant) by way of leases, unlawfully, because nether his father, Makaafa Lotaki, nor him, the plaintiff, knew of or consented to those actions in respect of those lands of the town allotment. (Paragraph 8 to 15). He accordingly prays for orders that the leases of the first defendant be cancelled and that the said lands be re registered as lands of the town allotment of the plaintiff.
L. M. Niu
NUKU’AlOFA: 29 OCTOBER 2019 J U D G E
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/to/cases/TOLC/2019/9.html