Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Magistrates Court of Solomon Islands |
IN THE SOLOMON ISLANDS MAGISTRATE’S COURT )
AT HONIARA )
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
Criminal Case No. 464 of 2013
REGINA
-v-
EDDIE FUNUBANA
Date of hearing: August 21st, 2017
Date of sentence: August 21st, 2017
Mr Konle for Prosecution
Mr Kwalai for the Defendant
SENTENCE
The accused pleaded guilty to the following charges:
Of the 8 charges, 3 are felony (kidnapping, demanding with menaces and larceny from person) whilst the rest are misdemeanours.
The facts that uncovered how the accused committed these offences are very disturbing. Disturbing because they revealed how an innocent person came to be a victim at the hands of the accused and his friends in which he was subjected to kidnapping and sustained assaults in and outside of the bus for the purpose of wanting to get money from him. His mobile phone and $200 were also stolen from him during the course of being kidnapped and assaulted in the bus. It must be a very traumatic experience for the victim having to be treated by persons totally strange to him in that like manner.
It was fortunate for him that he escaped out of the window of the bus when the bus stopped at Kakabona area, otherwise, what follows will be even more life threatening or horrific for this lone victim.
When one looks at the entire facts, they uncovered these aggravating factors:
When all these actions are put together, clearly, he played a significant role in committing the offences against the victim.
For the purpose of his sentence, I take into account his guilty plea, a family man with 7 children and by entering guilty pleas is a reflection of his remorse and an indication of his willingness to accept whatever form of sentence the court will impose on him. I give him full credit for that but since he is not a first time offender, the Court will not consider or treat him as being a first time offender for purposes of his sentence.
All these offences occurred on the same date and from the set of facts. Therefore, it is trite law that concurrent sentence is the appropriate form of sentence to be followed herein. I am mindful that any sentence to be imposed for his case must not exceed 5 years as required under the Magistrates Court Act.
The accused had spent 2 years, 9 months and 23 days in custody before his matter is finalised. In my view, even though the significant part of the delay was attributed to his conduct with issues regarding changes of legal representative, I think there are some delays that this matter has taken to have it finalised even after Mr. Kwalai of the Public Solicitors Office had represented him. These delays were for reasons regarding disclosures and the need to settle on the agreed facts before hearing of his sentence. Hence, in fairness to the accused, he must be given the benefit of the delay.
Clearly, the facts of this case call for custodial sentences. Under no circumstances, they will be non-custodial. As I have already described, this is an ordeal and a life threatening and a totally inhumane conduct wielded against the victim. Can the Court give offenders a warning or non-custodial sentence for these kinds of inconsiderate, cruel and cowardice acts? Unfortunately, it will be a big NO. The Court must represent the voice of that victim by imposing appropriate deterrent sentences so that this kind of criminal behaviour that is sophisticated in nature is discouraged.
Having considered all the reasons and factors mentioned herein, I imposed the following sentences on the accused:
Court Orders
I order all sentences to run concurrent meaning 3 years is the head sentence for all offences. I reduced 3 months to reflect the delay occasioned. His final sentence is that the accused is sentenced to 2 years and 10 months. Having spent 2 years, 9 months and 23 days in custody and taking into account 8 more days to go for completion of his sentence imposed herein, I order that period in presentence detention is already a sufficient penalty for him and hence, he is to be released forthwith from custody at the rising of the court.
The warrant of arrest issued against his other co-defendants will be adjourned generally pending execution. If they are executed then the matter will be listed at any time during the official hours.
Cash bail of $1000 paid on 4/02/2014 is forfeited for breach of his bail conditions.
14 days right of appeal.
___________________________________________
Augustine Aulanga
Principal Magistrate
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/sb/cases/SBMC/2017/37.html