You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Local Court of Solomon Islands >>
2021 >>
[2021] SBLC 4
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Rilangi v Unga [2021] SBLC 4; Land Case 18 of 2015 (15 April 2021)
IN MALAITA LOCAL COURT
AUKI MALAITA PROVINCE
SOLOMON ISLAND.
LAND CASE NO: 18 of 2015
IN THE MATTER OF: TAKARIA Parcel of Land within LAND
UMAIANO
BETWEEN: CHRIS RILANGI, PETERO BAEMAELIA PLAINTIFF
BILLY TAISELO
AND: BEN UNGA, PETER KIWAI, and PETER IROTA DEFENDANT
Preliminary Hearing
Date: 15th April 2021.
Time: 9: 45 AM.
Introduction
- On the 12th of May 2015 at Lola Custom house, a hearing was conducted by the Olomaoma House of Chief, this was a one-sided hearing
in the absence of the plaintiff’s party. The Olomaoma house of chiefs gave its determination in favor of the defendant’s
party. The case was then referred to the local court by the plaintiff and register as case number 18 of 2015.
- On the 22nd of March 2021, the local court listes case for hearing, and on the 15th of April 2021, the Local Court sits to hear the
issue bsue between both parties. The plaintiff informed the court that they are one tribe, the reason for referring this matter to
the local court is because the Olomaoma house of chief gives its decision in a one-sided settlement. But he informed the court that,
because they are one tribe they already discussed between themselves that if it is appropriate before this court, they asked the
court that they want this case to be withdrawn and they can solve the issue between them at their home. He said because they were
brothers it is appropriate to solve any issue raised among them just outside of court, that is why he pleaded with the court that
this matter should be withdrawn and should be solved between them at their home.
- In the defendant’s statement, he said that it just a disagreement between his father and the plaintiff, that the plaintiff has
cultivated a little bit part of the land. That is why they bring the matter before the chiefs, but he said, as it is already mentioned
by the plaintiff, they already discussed between themselves that it is better to settle the matter at their home rather than in the
court. The defendant confirmed to the court that they are brothers, and they want this matter to be withdrawn before this court and
let themselves solve the issue between them at their home.
- In accordance with the statement of both parties, that thl confirmed to the court and agreed that this matter should refer back for
them to solve thve the issue between them as brothers, this court accepts the request and make the following order.
Orders
- Olomaoma house of Chiefs determin is set aside.
- The Local Court case no:18 of 2015 is therefore withdrawn
- No orders of cost.
Signer:
Nelson Ne'e: ______________Vise President
Eddie Wasi: _______________ Member
Timme Aranga: ____________Member
Wesley Ramo: ____________Clerk
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/sb/cases/SBLC/2021/4.html