You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
High Court of Solomon Islands >>
2024 >>
[2024] SBHC 118
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Marape v Southern Forest Industry [2024] SBHC 118; HCSI-CC 51 of 2021 (24 September 2024)
HIGH COURT OF SOLOMON ISLANDS
Case name: | Marape v Southern Forest Industry |
|
|
Citation: |
|
|
|
Date of decision: | 24 September 2024 |
|
|
Parties: | Frank Willie Marape v Southern Forest Industry, Wan Lik Brothers Limited |
|
|
Date of hearing: | 24 September 2024 |
|
|
Court file number(s): | 51 of 2021 |
|
|
Jurisdiction: | Civil |
|
|
Place of delivery: |
|
|
|
Judge(s): | Bird; PJ |
|
|
On appeal from: |
|
|
|
Order: | I hereby dismiss this proceeding pursuant to rule 9.75 of the Solomon Islands Courts (Civil Procedure) Rules 2007. I also have the
discretion to strike out this proceeding under rule 9.71 of the rules. I hereby order. |
|
|
Representation: | Mr Alban Gotoa for the Claimants (No Appearance) Mr Whitlam Togamae for the First Defendant (No Appearance) Mr John Taupongi for the Second Defendant (No Appearance) |
|
|
Catchwords: |
|
|
|
Words and phrases: |
|
|
|
Legislation cited: | Solomon Islands Courts (civil Procedure) Rule 2007, r9.75 |
|
|
Cases cited: |
|
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOLOMON ISLANDS
CIVIL JURISDICTION
Civil Case No. 51 of 2021
BETWEEN:
FRANK WILLIE MARAPE
(Representing of Eliote, Paso and Eden Villages, Small Malaita, Malaita Province)
Claimant
AND:
SOUTHERN FOREST INDUSTRY
First Defendant
AND:
WAN LIK BROTHERS LIMITED
Second Defendant
Date of Hearing: 24 September 2024
Date of Decision: 24 September 2024
Mr Alban Gotoa for the Claimant (No Appearance)
Mr Whitlam Togamae for the First Defendant (No Appearance)
Mr John Taupongi for the Second Defendant (No Appearance)
RULING
Bird PJ:
- This is a case whereby it is alleged that there was a breach of the terms and conditions of felling license no. 101554. Mr Frank
Willie Marape claims to be representing Eliote, Paso and Eden Villages of South Malaita, Malaita Province. He also seeks damages
for alleged trespass and nuisance.
- Southern Forest Industry (SFI) is the holder of felling license no. 101554. Wan Lik Brothers Limited (WLBL) is the contractor under
the felling license.
- Mr Marape and one Michael Konia has previously commenced Civil Case No. 160 of 2018. The issues raised in that case are similar to
the issue raised in this case. CC160/18 was discontinued by Mr Marape and Mr Konia on 31 July 2018 following execution by all parties
of a Deed of Settlement.
- Clause 4 of the Deed provides for “Bar to Action”. Either party to the Deed may plead that bar to any action, suit or
proceeding.
- That issue aside, I have perused Mr Marape’s filed claim in this proceeding. He claims to be a representative for the three
respective villages stated therein. There is nothing further in the claim or sworn statement filed by him to satisfy me that he is
entitled to represent the three villages. He is from Eliote Village. How could he be entitled to represent Paso and Eden Villages.
- WLBL has in their defence raised the issue of Mr Marape’s standing to represent the three villages. His reply to the defence
only state that he was authorised by the members and chiefs of the three villages. There was no further sworn statement filed in
this proceeding for Mr Marape to verify the issue.
- Apart from the above, there is nothing in his statement of case that he is a signatory to any agreement with SFI and WLBL so that
he has the locus to sue them in this proceeding. There is also no decision by the relevant land courts to confirm he owns Hiolomasi
customary land. His claim in effect is lacking in substance so that this court can continue to entertain it.
- The case was called for mention before me this morning at 9.30am. None of the parties appeared. None of the lawyers acting for the
parties also appeared. There was no reason given for their absence.
- I have also noted that I made several direction orders on 30 November 2023. All of the orders were not complied with by the parties.
- Upon the discussions above, I hereby dismiss this proceeding pursuant to rule 9.75 of the Solomon Islands Courts (Civil Procedure)
Rules 2007. I also have the discretion to strike out this proceeding under rule 9.71 of the rules. I hereby order.
THE COURT
Justice Maelyn Bird
Puisne Judge
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/sb/cases/SBHC/2024/118.html