Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of Solomon Islands |
HIGH COURT OF SOLOMON ISLANDS
Case name: | R v Nawo |
| |
Citation: | |
| |
Date of decision: | 15 October 2021 |
| |
Parties: | Regina v Japhet Nawo |
| |
Date of hearing: | |
| |
Court file number(s): | 376 of 2021 |
| |
Jurisdiction: | Criminal |
| |
Place of delivery: | |
| |
Judge(s): | Maina; PJ |
| |
On appeal from: | |
| |
Order: | 1. Accused Japhet Nawo is sentence to 4 years’ imprisonment, 2. No furthers |
| |
Representation: | Ratu Oliver for the Crown Fagani Michael for the defence |
| |
Catchwords: | |
| |
Words and phrases: | |
| |
Legislation cited: | Penal Code (Amendment) (Sexual Offences) Act 2016 s 136F (1) (a) and (b) |
| |
Cases cited: | |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOLOMON ISLANDS
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
Criminal Case No. 376 of 2021
REGINA
V
JAPHET NAWO
Circuit: Lata, Temotu Province
Date of Sentence: 15 October 2021
Ratu Oliver for the Crown
Fagani Michael for the Defence
SENTENCE
I orally delivered the sentence for the accused Japhet Nawo and indicated to the give my reason after returning to Honiara and I now do so.
The accused Japhet Nawo was found guilty after a trail on one (1) count of rape contrary to sections 136F (1) (a) and (b) of the Penal Code (Amendment) (Sexual Offences) Act 2016.
Brief Facts
Accused Japhet Nawo went to the complainant house and told her to go to the garden to him and would give her money. He is a wild man and if she refused or did go, he would kill her.
The complainant was afraid or fear at the threat of wild man and so went to the garden to the accused. When the complainant arrived at the garden the accused held her hands and forced her to have sexual intercourse with him.
Accused struggled with the complainant, pulled her down to the ground, pulled down her clothes and had sexual intercourse with her.
The Law
Under sections 136F (1) (a) and (b) of the Penal Code (Amendment) (Sexual Offences) Act 2016.any person who is found guilty and convicted for rape shall be liable to life imprisonment.
Mitigation
The defence counsel did not raise any matter for the court to take into account in the consideration for mitigation.
As usual to the court I take into account the accused is the first offender but I give less weight in the sentence of this case.
Aggravating features
The accused was 35 years old at the time of the offence and the complainant was 24 years old, a disparity of 11 years.
Notably this offence was pre-mediated as the defendant told her to meet him at the garden and he threaten to kill her if she refuses.
I have said in the many cases of this nature that came before me about the prevalence of sexual offences or being imminent in our communities and it should be a concern to us. Besides being a shameful and disgraceful act on part of those who committed the offence of this nature, it has also cause or create disharmony of the peace in the communities and in particular with claim for compensations
The Sentence
Taking into account the facts, mitigation and aggravating features and prevalence of this type of offence in our communities, the accused Japhet Nawo is sentence to 4 years’ imprisonment.
The Orders
THE COURT
Hon Leonard R Maina
Puisne Judge
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/sb/cases/SBHC/2021/157.html