PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Solomon Islands

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Solomon Islands >> 2020 >> [2020] SBHC 128

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

R v Pugeva [2020] SBHC 128; HCSI-CRC 362 of 2017 (3 September 2020)

HIGH COURT OF SOLOMON ISLANDS


Case name:
R v Pugeva


Citation:



Date of decision:
3 September 2020


Parties:
Regina v Nano Pugeva


Date of hearing:



Court file number(s):



Jurisdiction:
Criminal


Place of delivery:



Judge(s):
Mwanesalua; DCJ


On appeal from:



Order:
Return this case to the Magistrate Court to sentence the Defendant.


Representation:
Mr. F. Fakari for the Prosecution
Mr. D. Kwalai for the Accused


Catchwords:



Words and phrases:



Legislation cited:
Penal Code S 89 (a), S178, S244, S326


Cases cited:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOLOMON ISLANDS
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION


Criminal Case No. 362 of 2017


REGINA


V


NANO PUGEVA


Date of Judgment: 3 September 2020


Mr. F. Fakari for the Prosecution
Mr. D. Kwalai for the Accused

JUDGMENT

This is an appeal case from the Magistrate Court. This was because the Magistrate discharged the accused of threating violence under section 89 (a) of the Penal Code, one count of threating and insulting words, under section 178 of the Penal Code, one count of common assault, under section 244 of the Penal Code and one count of Malicious damage under section 326 of the Penal Code.

On 3rd July 2017 the defendant was arraigned on the charges. The Defendant pleaded guilty to two charge of malicious damage and two counts of threatening violence.

On 10th July 2017, the Police Prosecutors were supposed to present agreed facts to the court and to be read to the Defendant.

However, on that date the Prosecutor was not in the court to present Agreed facts to the court.

The reason why there were no Prosecutors in court was because one of Police Prosecutors died and the other Prosecutors were making arrangement to take his body to his village.

The Magistrate had made a mistake when he dismissed the case as the defendant had already pleaded guilty. The Magistrate had already accepted a guilty plea from the Defendant before the date of dismissal of the case. Return this case to the Magistrate Court to sentence the Defendant.

THE COURT
Hon. Justice Francis Mwanesalua
Deputy Chief Justice


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/sb/cases/SBHC/2020/128.html