You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
High Court of Solomon Islands >>
2013 >>
[2013] SBHC 99
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Ale v Ale [2013] SBHC 99; HCSI-CC 138 of 2010 (2 August 2013)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOLOMON ISLANDS
(Mwanesalua J)
Civil Case No. 138 of 2010
BETWEEN:
ELLEN ALE
Petitioner
AND:
PERRY ALE
Respondent
Date of Ruling: 2 August 2013
Ms Bird for Petitioner
Respondent not in court
RULING
- This is an application by the Petitioner filed on 10 August 2011 for the following orders: (1) that the matrimonial properties in
parcel Nos 191-035-70 and 191-003-21 be distributed between the parties in these proceedings (2) That title of the property in parcel
No. 191-003-21 be registered under the sole name of the Petitioner (3) that title of property in Parcel No. 191-035-70 be registered
under the sole name of the Respondent (4) costs of this application be borne by the Respondent and (5) Any further orders that the
court deems fit to make.
- The Petitioner and the Respondent were married on 25 July 1994 at the Central Magistrate court. There were four children to the marriage
namely McChesney Ale age sixteen years, Terry Ale age fourteen years, Moma Ale age Thirteen years and Sophie Ale age ten years. At
the present time Terry Ale and Sophie Ale are living with the Petitioner and McChesney Ale and Moma Ale are living with the Respondent.
A decree nisi was pronounced by the court in respect of the marriage between the parties on 30 April 2010. The Petitioner is currently
living in the property on Parcel No. 191-003-21 with children Terry Ale and Sophie Ale. The Petitioner has been responsible and is
still being responsible for the loan repayment in respect of that said property.
- The Respondent is living in the property on Parcel No. 191-035-70 with McChesney Ale and Moma Ale. The Respondent is also responsible
for the loan repayment of the said property.
- In the circumstances, the court will grant the orders sought in the application. Further, an order that the custody arrangement between
the parties in relation to the four children of the marriage to remain as it at the present moment. Order accordingly.
THE COURT
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/sb/cases/SBHC/2013/99.html