PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Solomon Islands

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Solomon Islands >> 1999 >> [1999] SBHC 90

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Solomon Motors Ltd v Budget Rent a Car Corporation [1999] SBHC 90; HC-CC 215 of 1999 (8 September 1999)

HC-CC No: 215 of 1999

SOLOMON MOTORS LIMITED

ass="MsoNoMsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0"> -v-

BUDGET RENT A CAR CORPOR,
BUDGET RENT A CA A CAR INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATION

HIGH COURT OF SOLOMON ISLANDS
(PALMER J.)
CASE NO: 215 OF 1999

HEARING: 08 SEPTEMBER 1999
RULING: 08 SEPTEMBER 1999

SOL-LAW FOR THE PLAINTIFF/APPT
MOTIS PACIFIC LAWYERS FOR THE DEFENDANTS/RESPONDSPONDENTS

PALMER J.: The focus on this application this afternoon noon by learned Counsel Ms Wilson for the Respondents must not be lost sight in the midst of Counsel's negotiations and attempt to get a settlement in place.

It was unfortunate for alt this application could not proceed yesterday (7th September 1999) as scheduleeduled simply because the judge presiding, myself was not available due to illness. I find nothing to suggest that the Respondents were not in a position to proceed. I accept as undisputed that the Respondents had engaged overseas Counsel to attend on their behalf yesterday, who were prepared to proceed but could not; not of their own making. I had indicated in this hearing that I had left instructions with the Registry Clerks that I should be available today (Wednesday 8th September) or Thursday to hear the application of the Applicants if parties could agree on a date and time.

class="MsoNoMsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0"> Parties however had seized on that time ter into further negotiations, which they were entitled to d to do, to work on a settlement term.

It seems to me that whthat was going on, there appeared to be some mis-understanding between Counsels themselves as to when the adjournment date for the Summons of the Applicant could be heard. It is clear there was mention of the 14/9/99 at 1:00 pm and an agreement in principle conceded by Mr McQuire. That adjournment would not have mattered had what appeared to be an agreement arrived at yesterday had been accepted as final by the parties this morning.

Up until this morning, thee it was not clear to the parties themselves what the true true position of the case would be. The adjournment date unfortunately had not been confirmed by this Court. That is clear in my view from submissions of learned Counsels.

I notMcQuire's submission that he is ready to proceed today. However the Respondents are nare not, without overseas Counsels who had been engaged to take up this matter. Whatever the submissions presented by Mr McQuire, whether right or not that this matter can be dealt with by Motis Lawyers, I bear in mind that the engagement of Overseas Counsel in this case is a right of the Respondents and that they had indeed demonstrated a willingness to come all the way to represent their client. To deny them that right now in my respectful view would not be fair to the Respondent.

But of importancey respectful view is the fact that no adjournment date had actually been confironfirmed by this Court or the Registry Office to Counsels. The matter had simply been left in limbo till this afternoon.

I also bear in mind no prejudill be suffered by the Applicants if an adjournment is grantgranted to the 14th.

I also point out that whether overCounsel are available on that date or not, will not affect fect the hearing on that date. Motis Lawyer must be prepared to proceed with the case in their absence.

lass="MsoNoMsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0"> On the issue of costs, whilst I appreciate the concerns and submissions r, in my respectful view thew the proper order for costs would be in the cause.

Adjournment made to 14/9/99 at 2:00Orders made by this court on 30/8/99 which affect this matt matter to continue.

THE COURT

pixgrn.jpg (632 bytes)

[About the School of Law] | [Courses Offered] | [Course Materials] | [Staff]
[Pacific Law Materials] | [Journal of South Pacific Law]
[Emalus Campus Library] | [Recommended Internet Links]
[Latest Additions] | [Search the Site]

© University of the South Pacific 1998-2002

If you have any any comments, suggestions or difficulties with using this web site please email
Robynne Blake
, Internet Project Manager, The School of Law, The University of the South Pacific or fax: (678) 27785

Last Update: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:32


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/sb/cases/SBHC/1999/90.html