PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Solomon Islands

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Solomon Islands >> 1999 >> [1999] SBHC 69

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Kuve v Ragoso [1999] SBHC 69; HC-CC 232 of 1999 (6 July 1999)

HIGH COU SOLOMON ISLANDS>

Civil Case No. 232 of 1999

MARLON KUVE

<

v<

lass=lass="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 1; margin-bottom: 1"> HERRICK RAGOSO
(as (as representative of Zerolyn Viuru, Melton Jona,
Jeddie Alu and Lorraine Boso),
BAVA ISLAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED
& HAPPY ISLET LOGGING COMPANY LTD

Hight of Solomon Islands
Before: Lungole-Awich, J

Civil Case No. 232 of 1999

Date of Hearing: 6 July 1999
Date of Judgment: 6 July 1999

Mr. P Lavery for the plaintiff

Judgment: Ex Tempore

JUDGMENT

(LUNGOLE-AWICH, J):- It appears there are sufficient facts to warrant the hearing of this application ex parte. A shipment of timber logs is about to depart, and it is most probable that parties to the logging operation on land parcels Nos. 079-006-2 and 079-006-4 on Bava, Vella La Vella Island will any time receive payments arising under the contract(s) leading to the logging operation, and the money could be used up any time, especially if payees get wind of this case.

I have also identified reasonable causes of action based on plausible facts stated in the affidavit, that disclose serious issues for trial. Briefly, the plaintiff avers and deposes that the first defendants are not trustees and were not supposed to have been registered title holders of the land parcels; the reason he gave is that the majority of the Bava tribe did not appoint the first defendants, rather the majority appointed the plaintiff. Alternatively the plaintiff alleges wrongful distribution of the income of the logging operation. In his writ of summons, he claims, among others, declaration about the status of the present trustees, injunction against paying out monies and account to be taken of trees felled and monies that have come in as revenue. The plaintiff has established those as serious issues for trial. I grant:

1. & p; &nbp;&nbp; That the applicais one proe proper to be made ex parte.

: 1">

2. &nbbsp; &nbsp Iniunctgan at the First dest defendants restraining them, their agents, servants or representatives from receiving any money payable under contracts connected with or arising from the logging operation on land parcels Nos. 079-006-2 and 079-006-4.

3. &nbssp; &nsp;&nbp; Injunctiotraineng second aond and third defendants their agents, servants or representatives from paying any money to the first defendants.

5. &nbs; &nbbsp;&&nbp; Isp; In the event that tisre is need to pay out money to meet necessary expenses, application may be made to the Registrar if parties are unable to agree.

6. &nbbsp;& &nsp; Usp; Undertaking for damises is dispensed with now, but the question is to be submitted upon duringi>intrtes hearing.

7. & p;&nbsp&nbsp &nbp; These im orders are to laso last until 30.7.1999, but parties are at liberty to apply on urgent basis. Inter partes hearing will be on 30.7.

class="Mso="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: -35.45pt; margin-left: 70.9pt; margin-top: 1; margin-bottom: 1"> 8. nbsp; &nbop; Carts eserved.

Dated this 6th day of July 1999

Sam Lungole-Awich
Judge


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/sb/cases/SBHC/1999/69.html