PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Kiribati

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Kiribati >> 2010 >> [2010] KIHC 82

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

Taraia v Taraia [2010] KIHC 82; Civil Case 91 of 2010 (17 August 2010)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KIRIBATI
CIVIL JURISDICTION
HELD AT BETIO


High Court Civil Case 91 of 2010


Between:


Aretaake Taraia
Applicant


And:


Roota Taraia
Tibwere Taraia
Marutaake Taraia
Respondents


For the Applicant: Ms Maere Kirata
For the Respondents: Mr Iotita Kuarawete


Date of Hearing: 17 August 2010


JUDGMENT
(Ex Tempore)


The land Kabengawae 654m had been given to the DBK as security for a loan. The loan was paid off. In CN TN 18/07 on 30 January 2007 the applicant and the respondents went to the Magistrates' Court to have the land registered again in their names. The Court granted the registration. The minute:


So pursuant to section 5(3)(a) of the Native Lands and that the debt has been cleared and the reinstatement of this land is accepted, not to the land owner namely Taraia but to the issues namely Rota Taraia, Aretaake Taraia, Tibwere Taraia and Marutaake Karawaiti.


The names of Roota Taraia, Aretaake Taraia, Tibwere Taraia and Marutaake Karawaiti will be registered on land Kabengawae 654m in Bikenibeu.


On 1 September 2008 the three respondents, without the knowledge of the applicant went to the Magistrates' Court (CN 864/08) to have the land distributed amongst the three of them. The applicant was not a party, was not present and was not mentioned to the Court by the respondents. The Single Magistrate accepted the registration and confirmed the distribution amongst the three respondents, so excluding the applicant although a registered owner.


The decision in CN 864/08 cannot stand. This application for certiorari is to quash that decision. The application is out of time, being dated 20 July 2010. In the applicant's affidavit in support of the application, the applicant explains that he knew nothing of the distribution until early in 2010 when he visited his aunty who told him the three respondents had become the co-owners. The applicant acted quite promptly: promptly enough for the Court to extend the time within which to apply. It is extended to 21 July 2010. Time having been extended and ample grounds made out the application for certiorari is granted. The decision in CN 864/08 is quashed.


THE HON ROBIN MILLHOUSE QC
Chief Justice


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/ki/cases/KIHC/2010/82.html