Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of Kiribati |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KIRIBATI
LAND JURISDICTION
HELD AT BETIO
REPUBLIC OF KIRIBATI
High Court Land Appeal 46 of 2002
Between:
EMI BOB
Appellant
And:
TEITIA REDFERN
Respondent
For the Appellant: Ms Botika Maitinnara
For the Respondent: Mr Katarake Tebweao
Date of Hearing: 31 December 2004
JUDGMENT
(Ex Tempore)
Ms Maitinnara’s principal submission is that there was no completed boundary determination. She referred us to the evidence in the Magistrates’ Court to that effect. To the contrary Mr Tebweao pointed out that the two other witnesses said the determination was completed. The Single Magistrate saw and heard the witnesses and found that the determination had been made and completed. That was a matter of fact for the Magistrate to decide. There is no reason for us to upset it.
The magistrate relied on the plain words of the judgment in 53/89 that the whole of the land had been sold by the appellant to the respondent. That was a proper decision.
The appeal must be dismissed.
THE HON ROBIN MILLHOUSE QC
Chief Justice
BETERO KAITANGARE
Magistrate
RARATU IEITA
Magistrate
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/ki/cases/KIHC/2004/294.html