Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Supreme Court of Guam |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM
TELEGUAM HOLDINGS LLC AND
ITS WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES,
v.
TERRITORY OF GUAM; DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY; THE OFFICE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY,
and
PACIFIC DATA SYSTEMS, INC.,
Supreme Court Case No. CVA16-017
Superior Court Case No.
CV0334-13
OPINION
Cite as: 2018 Guam 5
Appeal from the Superior Court of Guam
Argued and submitted
on May 31, 2017
Hagåtña, Guam
Appearing for Defendant-Appellant
Pacific Data Systems, Inc.: Bill R. Mann, Esq. Berman O’Connor & Mann Bank of Guam Bldg. 111 Chalan Santo Papa, Ste. 503 Hagåtña, GU 96910 Appearing for Defendant-Appellee
Government of Guam: Marianne Woloschuk, Esq. Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General Civil Litigation & Solicitors Division 590 S. Marine Corps Dr., Ste. 706 Tamuning, GU 96913 |
Appearing for Plaintiff-Appellee
Teleguam Holdings LLC: Vincent C. Camacho, Esq. Camacho Calvo Law Group LLC 134 W. Soledad Ave., Ste. 401 Hagåtña, GU 96910 |
BEFORE: KATHERINE A. MARAMAN, Chief Justice; F. PHILIP CARBULLIDO, Associate Justice; ROBERT J. TORRES, Associate Justice.
CARBULLIDO, J.:
[1] This appeal arises out of a lengthy government procurement dispute
regarding the Government of Guam’s attempt to procure comprehensive
telecommunication services. Defendant-Appellant Pacific Data Systems, Inc.
(“PDS”) appeals a final judgment of the Superior
Court granting
summary judgment to Plaintiff-Appellee Teleguam Holdings LLC (“GTA”)
and canceling the entirety of a ten-part
Invitation for Bids
(“IFB”). PDS seeks appellate review of the Superior Court’s
procedure for reviewing decisions
of the Public Auditor and whether the trial
court erred in canceling the IFB. In response, GTA argues that PDS lacks
appellate standing
and that the cancellation and proceedings below were proper.
[2]
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/gu/cases/GUSC/2018/5.html