Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Supreme Court of Guam |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM
ALBERT J. BALAJADIA and WILLIAM L. GAVRAS,
v.
GOVERNMENT OF GUAM,
Supreme Court Case No.: CVA16-004
Superior Court Case No.:
CV0183-15
OPINION
Cite as: 2017 Guam 1
Appeal from the Superior Court of Guam
Argued and submitted
on October 19, 2016
Hagåtña, Guam
Appearing for Plaintiff-Appellants:
William L. Gavras, Esq. Law Offices of William L. Gavras 101 Salisbury St. Dededo, GU 96929 |
Appearing for Defendant-Appellee:
David Highsmith, Esq. Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General Litigation Division 590 S. Marine Corps Dr., Ste. 706 Tamuning, GU 96913 |
BEFORE: ROBERT J. TORRES, Chief Justice; F. PHILIP CARBULLIDO, Associate Justice; KATHERINE A. MARAMAN, Associate Justice.[1]
CARBULLIDO, J.:
[1] Plaintiff-Appellants Albert J. Balajadia and William Gavras
(collectively, “Appellants”) appeal from a final judgment
of the
trial court granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Government
of Guam in an action Appellants filed to determine
the parties’ rights to
disputed funds Balajadia recovered in a personal injury settlement. The
Government argued before the
trial court that it had a right of subrogation, and
should collect from the funds recovered from the third-party tortfeasor, because
it had earlier paid Balajadia’s medical expenses pursuant to Guam’s
Worker’s Compensation statute. Gavras, Balajadia’s
attorney, argued
that the Government could not exercise such a right because Balajadia was not
made whole by the settlement funds.
Gavras also argued that, regardless of
allotment between the Government and his client, he should receive a contingency
fee on the
entire recovery pursuant to his client agreement. On appeal,
Appellants argue that the trial court erred in deciding a declaration
Gavras
filed before that court (the “Declaration”) was insufficient to
defeat the Government’s motion for summary
judgment as to both
issues.
[2]
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/gu/cases/GUSC/2017/1.html