Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Supreme Court of Guam |
IN
THE SUPREME COURT OF
GUAM
PETER
WILKINSON AND ELLEN
WILKINSON,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
LUCHIE
JONES AND ANGELITA A.
MELTON,
Defendants-Appellees.
OPINION
Filed:
August 2,
2004
Cite
as: 2004 Guam
14
Supreme Court Case
No.: CVA97-019
Superior
Court Case No.:
CV1821-94
Appeal from
the Superior Court of
Guam
Submitted on the
Briefs on July 1,
2002
Hagåtña,
Guam
Appearing for Plaintiffs-Appellants: Lawrence J. Teker, Esq. Teker Torres & Teker, PC Ste. 2A, 130 Aspinall Ave. Hagåtña, Guam 96910 |
Appearing for Defendants-Appellees: Paul J. Vernier, Esq. Vernier & Maher, LLP 115 Hesler Place, Grd. Fl. Gov. Joseph Flores Bldg. Hagåtña, Guam 96910 |
BEFORE:
F. PHILIP CARBULLIDO, Chief Justice, FRANCES TYDINGCO-GATEWOOD, Associate
Justice, PETER C.
SIGUENZA,
Justice
Pro
Tempore.
PER
CURIAM:
[1] After
closing on the purchase of a new home, Appellants Peter and Ellen Wilkinson
(AWilkinsons@)
discovered that the seller, Angelita Melton
(AMelton@),
was the mother of real estate broker Appellee Luchie Jones
(AJones@),
and that Melton had purchased the home from the original owner for $100,000 less
than the price the Wilkinsons paid. The Wilkinsons
then filed suit against Jones
and Melton, alleging fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and conspiracy. The trial
court granted summary
judgment in favor of Jones and Melton. We reverse and
remand this case back to the trial court.
I.
[2] The
following facts are as alleged in the pleadings and other papers filed in the
lower court. The Barrigada Townhouse Partnership
(ADevelopers@)
gave Jones exclusive authorization to sell sixteen units of the Colina de
Barrigada condominium development in December 1991. This
exclusive authorization
was thereafter extended. By December 1993, several of the units had been sold.
The Developers indicated that
they were willing to sell the remaining eleven
units at $450,000 each if they could sell them all to a single purchaser.
[3]
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/gu/cases/GUSC/2004/13.html