Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Supreme Court of Guam |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM
PEOPLE
OF GUAM
Plaintiff-Appellee
vs.
GERALD
VINCENT LEON GUERRERO
Defendant-Appellant
OPINION
Supreme Court Case No.
CRA99-026
Superior Court Case No. CF0036-93
Filed: August 16, 2001
Cite as: 2001 Guam 19
Appeal from the Superior Court
of Guam
Submitted on January 17, 2001
Hagåtña, Guam
Representing the
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Angela Borzachillo, Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General Prosecution Division Suite 2-200E, Judicial Ctr. Bldg. 120 West O'Brien Drive Hagåtña, Guam 96910 |
Representing the
Defendant-Appellant:
Matthew T. Gregory, Esq. Mair, Mair, Spade & Thompson Suite 807, GCIC Building Avenue 414 West Soledad Hagåtña, Guam 96910 |
BEFORE: PETER C. SIGUENZA,
JR., Chief Justice
(Acting)[1];
F. PHILIP CARBULLIDO, Associate Justice; and JOHN A. MANGLONA, Designated
Justice.
CARBULLIDO,
J.:
[1] On October 18,
1993, after a trial by jury, the Appellant, Gerald Vincent Leon Guerrero
(hereinafter ALeon
Guerrero@) was
convicted of the offenses of Kidnapping (As a First Degree Felony), Aggravated
Assault (As a Third Degree Felony) and Possession
of a Firearm Without a Firearm
Identification Card (As a Felony). The jury additionally found Leon Guerrero
guilty of the Special
Allegation of the Use of a Deadly Weapon in the Commission
of a Felony for each of the first two charges. Appellate counsel has filed
an
Anders brief stating that he does not
believe that Leon Guerrero has any basis for appeal.
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87
S.Ct. 1396 (1967).
[2] The
Anders brief submits that four
arguable issues for appeal may exist: (1) whether Leon Guerrero was deprived of
the effective assistance
of trial counsel; (2) whether the trial court erred in
overruling certain evidentiary objections; (3) whether there was sufficient
evidence to sustain Leon Guerrero's conviction; and, (4) whether Leon Guerrero
was competent to stand trial. We have independently
reviewed the record and the
issues raised by counsel in the Anders
brief. We conclude that no meritorious issue for review has been raised.
Pursuant to the procedures set forth in
Anders, we dismiss this appeal as
frivolous.
I.
[3] On
or about February 4, 1993, Leon Guerrero confronted Jesse Pablo Cordero
(hereinafter
ACordero@)
immediately after Cordero dropped Leon Guerrero's girlfriend, Angela Taitano
(hereinafter
ATaitano@)
at her residence in Yigo. Leon Guerrero exited his vehicle and entered Cordero's
vehicle and directed Cordero to drive to a nearby
remote area. An individual
identified as Jack Hanson, driving Leon Guerrero's vehicle, followed Leon
Guerrero and Cordero to a jungle
area on a dirt road off the main
road.[2]
After Leon Guerrero questioned Cordero regarding his relationship with Taitano,
he retrieved a rifle from his car. Leon Guerrero
struck Cordero three times with
the rifle and ordered him into the trunk of Cordero's car. Fearing for his life,
Cordero entered
the trunk of his car.
[4]
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/gu/cases/GUSC/2001/19.html