Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Supreme Court of Guam |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM
MARIANO
T. PAULINO, JR., TERESITA
S.N.
PAULINO, THOMAS MICHAEL PETRIE
and
BRIGIDA PAULINO
PETRIE,
Plaintiffs-Appellants
vs.
ROLAND
C. BISCOE, RANDOLPH C. BISCOE,
GLENN
C. BISCOE, SAMUEL C. BISCOE,
MARYANN
C. BISCOE, OSHIMA
CONSTRUCTION GUAM CORP.,
a Guam
Corporation,
Defendants-Appellees
______________________
MARIANO
T. PAULINO, JR., TERESITA
S.N.
PAULINO, THOMAS MICHAEL PETRIE
and
BRIGIDA PAULINO
PETRIE,
Plaintiffs-Appellants
vs.
BENNY
C. BELLO, PACIFIC
FINANCIAL
CORPORATION and OSHIMA
CONSTRUCTION
GUAM
CORPORATION,
Defendants-Appellees
Supreme Court Case No.
CVA98-034
Superior Court Case Nos. CV0348-93 and CV0349-93
OPINION
Filed: April 10, 2000
Cite as: 2000 Guam 13
Appeal from the Superior Court
of Guam
Argued and submitted on August 9, 1999
Hagåtña,
Guam
Appearing for the Plaintiffs-Appellants: John A. Spade, Esq. Mair, Mair, Spade & Thompson Suite 807, GCIC Bldg 414 W. Soledad Avenue Hagåtña, Guam 96910 |
Appearing for the Defendants-Appellees: Jeffrey A. Cook, Esq. Cunliffe & Cook Suite 200, 210 Archbishop F.C. Flores Street Hagåtña, Guam 96910 |
BEFORE: PETER C. SIGUENZA,
Chief Justice
(Acting)[1],
MICHAEL J. BORDALLO, Designated Justice, and LAWRENCE J. TEKER, Justice
Pro Tempore.
SIGUENZA,
C.J.:
[1] The trial court
held that a lender, who had foreclosed on land of the debtor pursuant to a
private power of sale provision in the
mortgages, could not sue the debtor to
recover a deficiency judgment for the difference between the debt and the
proceeds received
from the sale of the foreclosed land. Because we find that the
trial court erred in its conclusion we reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
[2] On July 25, 1989, the Defendants-Appellees (the ABiscoes@) gave to the Plaintiffs-Appellants (the APaulinos@) a promissory note in the amount of $458,264.00. A mortgage on Lot 16-13, Talofofo, Guam, was executed and delivered as security for the note. On that same date, a second promissory note in the amount of $446,392.00 was given by the Biscoes to the Paulinos and a mortgage on another piece of real property, specifically Lot 16-14, Talofofo, Guam, was also executed and delivered as security for the second note. Both mortgages were recorded at the Department of Land Management, Government of Guam. Each of the mortgages contained a provision allowing for the remedy of foreclosure by non-judicial sale upon default.[2]
[3]
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/gu/cases/GUSC/2000/13.html