Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Kosrae State Court |
KOSRAE STATE COURT
TRIAL DIVISION
Cite as
Abraham v. Kosrae, 9 FSM Intrm. 57 (Kos. S. Ct. Tr. 1999)
SEPE P. ABRAHAM,
Plaintiff,
vs.
STATE OF KOSRAE,
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-98
RULING ON FAILURE TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
Aliksa B. Aliksa
Acting Chief Justice
Hearing: February 1, 1999
Decided: February 25, 1999
APPEARANCES:
For the Plaintiff:
Canney Palsis
Micronesian Legal Services
Corporation
P.O. Box 38
Lelu, Kosrae FM 96944
For the Defendant:
Debra S. Blum, Esq.
Assistant Attorney
General
Office of the Kosrae Attorney General
P.O. Box 870
Tofol,
Kosrae FM 96944
* * * *
HEADNOTES
Civil Procedure; Jurisdiction
Whether a court has
subject matter jurisdiction is an issue that may be raised at any time.
Abraham v. Kosrae, 9 FSM Intrm. 57, 59 (Kos. S. Ct. Tr. 1999).
Administrative Law - Judicial Review
Administrative
procedures, where applicable and valid, must be followed before seeking judicial
disposition of matter. It is incumbent
on parties to follow administrative
procedures concerning their disputes as designated by applicable state law
before coming to court
unless and until the state law is judged invalid.
Abraham v. Kosrae, 9 FSM Intrm. 57, 60 (Kos. S. Ct. Tr. 1999).
Administrative Law - Judicial Review; Public Officers and
Employees - Kosrae
When the administrative steps essential for court
review of employment terminations have not yet been completed, the court cannot
review the termination. Abraham v. Kosrae, 9 FSM Intrm. 57,
60 (Kos. S. Ct. Tr. 1999).
Administrative Law
Generally, the validity of a regulation
depends on whether the administrative agency had the power to adopt the
particular regulation.
The regulation must be within the matter covered by the
enabling statute. Abraham v. Kosrae, 9 FSM Intrm. 57, 60 (Kos. S. Ct. Tr.
1999).
Administrative Law
A regulation, valid when promulgated,
becomes invalid upon the later enactment of another statute which is in conflict
with the regulation.
However, an administrative regulation will not be
considered as having been impliedly invalidated by a subsequent act of the
legislature
unless the regulation and the later law are irreconcilable, clearly
repugnant and inconsistent that they cannot have concurrent operation.
Abraham v. Kosrae, 9 FSM Intrm. 57, 60 (Kos. S. Ct. Tr. 1999).
Administrative Law
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fm/cases/FMKSC/1999/2.html