You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Magistrates Court of Fiji >>
2020 >>
[2020] FJMC 72
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Download original PDF
State v Tui [2020] FJMC 72; Criminal Case 44 of 2020 (17 March 2020)
IN THE MAGISTRATES’ COURT OF FIJI
AT TAVUA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
Criminal Case No: 44 - 2020
STATE
-v-
LUKE TUI
Before : RM Fotofili L.
For The Prosecution : WPC Chand A. [ Police Prosecution ]
For The Defendant : In Person, Waived Right To Counsel
Date of Sentence : 17th March 2020
SENTENCE
- LUKE TUI, you have pleaded guilty to the following charge :
Count 1
Statement of Offence
THEFT: Contrary to section 291 ( 1 ) of the Crimes Act 2009.
Particulars of Offence
LUKE TUI on the 24th day of December, 2019 at Tavua Town in the Western Division dishonestly appropriated $50 the property of WILLIAM FER, with the intention of permanently depriving the said WILLIAM FER.
Count 2
Statement of Offence
BREACH OF BAIL CONDITION: Contrary to section 25 ( 1 ) ( c ) and 26 ( 1 ) of the Bail Act No. 26 of 2000 and Bail Amendment Decree No. 28 of 2012.
Particulars of Offence
LUKE TUI on the 24th day of December, 2019 at Tavua in the Western Division breached the condition of bail by reoffending whilst on bail, a condition
imposed by Tavua Magistrate Court vide case File Number 72/16.
- Your plea and admission in court and the evidence tendered, supports your guilty plea. I am also satisfied that you understand the
consequence of your plea.
- I have also taken judicial notice of the records in your other pending file CF 72 – 16. You are charged with using indecent
language in public in that case. You have denied the allegation and that case is awaiting trial. You were granted bail with conditions
in that case on the 3rd of May 2016 and one of your conditions of bail was not to re-offend while the case was pending. You breached that condition when
you committed theft which is the subject of count 1.
- I find you guilty and convict you of both counts in the charge.
- The victim is 16 years old. He was in the area attending a family reunion. You told him that you knew a place where you could get
good BBQ at 2 am in the morning. The victim gave you $50 and you went to the village. The victim waited for you for about 5 minutes
but you did not return. A search was made for you but it was unsuccessful. The matter was then reported to police. While the victim
was at the police station, you came by in a carrier and told the victim that you are going to ‘pick it up’. You then
went to the village and never returned or gave the money to the victim. You were arrested from your house on the 3rd of February, 2020 which is about 2 months later.
- After your arrest, you were then interviewed under caution by police. You admitted receiving the $50 from the victim to buy BBQ. You
were drinking liquor at the time. You used the money for transport fare, buying cigarette and you kept the rest of the money. You
said that you had forgotten about the money given by the victim.
- I do not accept every answer or admission made in your police statement. I am satisfied that you knew that you had the money in your
possession and you used or kept it.
- There has been no repayment or recovery of this $50.
- You are not a first offender. You have 2 convictions for being drunk and disorderly in 2019, a conviction for breaching a bail condition
in 2018 and a conviction for absconding bail in 2017.
- You have been in remand in this case since the 4th of February 2020 [ first call ]. I have already given you the reasons for why you had to be remanded. There was a strong case against
you and you have several cases pending before me. I will not consider any time spent in remand as time served. You are a menace to
the community and it is unlikely that you will honour your bail terms if granted bail.
- You are 23 years old. You seek forgiveness. You are the sole breadwinner and you look after your parents. You say that your father
is suffering from cancer. You say that you have learnt your lesson while being in remand.
MAXIMUM SENTENCE
- The maximum punishment for theft is up to 10 years imprisonment.
- The maximum sentence that is imposable by law for absconding or breaching a bail condition can be a fine of up to $2,000 and or imprisonment
of up to 12 months.
SENTENCING RANGE or SENTENCING TARIFF
- The sentencing tariff for theft is as follows [ Ratusili v State [2012] FJHC 1249; HAA011.2012 ( 1 August 2012 ) ] :
(i) for a first offence of simple theft the sentencing range should be between 2 and 9
months.
(ii) any subsequentquent offence should attract a penalty of at least 9 months.
(iii) Theft of large sums of money and thefts in breach of trust, whether first offence
or not can attract sentences of up to three years.
(iv) regard should be had to the nature of the relationship between offender and
victim.
(v) planned thefts will attract greater sentences than opportunistic thefts.
- The tariff for breaching a bail condition and absconding bail are the same. It is between a suspended sentence to 9 months imprisonment
[ see for example - Ulumatai v State [ 2019 ] FJHC 114; HAA90.2018 ( 22 February 2019 ) ].
STARTING POINT
- Based on the objective seriousness of the offence, I select the following starting points:
Count 1: Theft - 3 months imprisonment.
Count 2: Breach of Bail – 1 month imprisonment
AGGRAVATING FEATURES
- You made the victim wait on you.
- He was 16 years old and naïve. You exploited that.
- You engaged in what was essentially a ‘con’.
- I do not find any material aggravating feature for Count 2.
Count 1: Theft – increased to 5 months imprisonment
Count 2: Breach of Bail – remains at 1 month imprisonment
MITIGATION
- I do not find your family circumstance compelling. You are the primary author of your current predicament and you cannot claim family
circumstance as mitigation if you go out of your way to commit an offence and breach your bail condition.
- However, you have cooperated with police during your interview.
- You are remorseful.
Count 1: Theft – reduced to 3 months imprisonment
Count 2: Breach of Bail – reduce to 20 days imprisonment
GUILTY PLEA
- You have pleaded guilty early.
Count 1: Theft – reduced to 2 months imprisonment
Count 2: Breach of Bail – reduced to 13 days imprisonment
FINAL SENTENCE
- Your sentence is aimed at deterrence and is to punish you adequately.
- As I have explained, I will not consider any time spent in remand as time served and so no further reduction will be made to your
sentence.
Count 1 THEFT
- Count 1: Theft – you are sentenced to 2 months imprisonment.
- This will be suspended in part.
- You will serve 1 month imprisonment and the remaining 1 month will be suspended for the next 2 years.
- Do not commit any other serious offence or any offence punishable with imprisonment in the next 2 years or your remaining 1 month
imprisonment may be activated.
- There is no need for the imposition of a domestic violence restraining order [ DVRO ] in this case as there is no domestic relationship
between the parties.
Count 2 – Breach of a Bail Condition
- Count 2: Breach of Bail – you are sentenced to 13 days imprisonment.
- I refuse to suspend this term either in part or in whole.
CONSECUTIVE SENTENCE
- I am mindful of the totality principle and the one transaction rule.
- I order that you serve your sentence in both counts, consecutively to each other.
- This means that you are to serve a total of 1 month and 13 days imprisonment.
- Remember that another 1 month imprisonment is held in suspense [ for the next 2 years ] for count 1.
- You are to serve 1 month and 13 days imprisonment immediately.
- 28 days to appeal to the High Court if there is any dissatisfaction with the sentence.
....................................................
Lisiate T.V. Fotofili
Resident Magistrate
Dated at TAVUA this 17th day of March, 2020
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJMC/2020/72.html