PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Magistrates Court of Fiji

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Magistrates Court of Fiji >> 2019 >> [2019] FJMC 112

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


State v Mujim - Sentence [2019] FJMC 112; Criminal Case 536 of 2014 (2 August 2019)

IN THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT AT LABASA

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

Criminal Case No. 536 of 2014


STATE


v


MOHHAMED MUJIM


Appearance : PC Lal for the prosecution

Mrs Boseiwaqa. K for the accused


Sentence : 2 August 2019


SENTENCE


  1. Mohhamed Mujim today is for sentencing for one count of Theft, contrary to section 291 of the Crimes Decree.
  2. You pleaded guilty to the charge on 22 March 2019, in the presence of your counsel. I find your plea to be unequivocal as it was given on your own free will.
  3. The facts of the case are that on 24 August 2014, you stole the victim’s calf from where it was tied at Tikilo, Seaqaqa. You took the calf without the consent of the victim. In doing so you permanently deprived the victim of his calf. You slaughtered the calf and sold the meat. The value of the calf is $300.00.
  4. You admitted to the above summary of facts on 29 July 2019, and convicted as charged.
  5. The maximum sentence for the offence of theft is 10 years imprisonment. In the case of Ratusili v State [2012] FJHC 1249; HAA011.2012 (1 August 2012), the High Court set the tariff as follows;-
    1. First offence of simple theft, sentence range between 2 and 9 months;
    2. Any subsequent offence, attracts penalty at least 9 months;
    1. Theft of large sum of money and theft in breach of trust, whether first offence or not attract sentences of up to 3 years;
    1. Planned thefts attract greater sentence than opportunistic thefts.
  6. The aggravating factors are;-
    1. You deny the victim to enjoy the fruit of his hard work,
    2. There was no recovery,
    1. You create insecurity to the farming communities.
  7. The compelling mitigating factors are;-
    1. Sole bread winner,
    2. Seeking court forgiveness.
  8. This is a well panned theft and it attract greater sentence. For your sentence I pick 12 months as my starting point. I add 1 year for the aggravating factors. That increases your sentence to 2 years imprisonment. I reduce 6 months for your mitigation. That reduce your sentence to 1 year and 6 months imprisonment. I reduce 2 months for your guilty plea. That reduce your sentence to 1 year and 4 months imprisonment.
  9. I noted from the record that you were in remand for about 1 month. I reduce that from your sentence. Your final sentence is 15 months imprisonment.
  10. In State v Filipe Ratusuka & others, High Court, Criminal Appeal No. HAA 001 of 2013 (7 March 2013) Goundar. J, stated that animal theft is considered as a serious offence and immediate custodial sentence should be imposed. In light of this decision I find that this is not an appropriate case for suspended sentence.
  11. Mohhamed Mujim, I now sentence you to 15 months imprisonment

28 days to appeal.


C. M. Tuberi

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJMC/2019/112.html