You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
Magistrates Court of Fiji >>
2017 >>
[2017] FJMC 108
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
State v Tokaduadua - Sentence [2017] FJMC 108; Criminal Case 91.2017 (5 September 2017)
IN THE MAGISTRATES’ COURT OF FIJI
AT NAUSORI
Criminal Case No: -91/2017
STATE
V
JIUTA TOKADUADUA
For the Prosecution: WPC Taitila
The accused: In person
Date of Sentence : 05th of September 2017
SENTENCE
- JIUTA TOKADUADUA, you were charged with one count of Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm contrary to section 275 of the Crimes Act No 44 of 2009(“Crimes
Act”).
- You pleaded guilty for this charge and also admitted the summary of facts presented by the prosecution.
- According to the summary of facts you are married to the victim .On 28th August 2017 she was coming from her mother’s place
when she met you and you started punching her head and face. You dragged her from roadside to your home and again punched her causing
multiple injuries in her body.
- I am satisfied with your plea and convict you for this charge.
- The maximum penalty for this offence under the Crimes Act is 05 years imprisonment.
- In State v Tugalala [2008] FJHC 78; HAC025S.2008S (29 April 2008) her Ladyship justice Shameem said :
“The tariff for this offence appears to range from an absolute or conditional discharge to 12 months imprisonment.”
- In Laisiasa Koroivuki v the State [2013] FJCA 15; AAU0018.2010 (5 March 2013) the Court of Appeal discussed the guiding principles for determining the starting point in sentencing
and observed :
"In selecting a starting point, the court must have regard to an objective seriousness of the offence. No reference should be made
to the mitigating and aggravating factors at this stage. As a matter of good practice, the starting point should be picked from the
lower or middle range of the tariff. After adjusting for the mitigating and aggravating factors, the final term should fall within
the tariff. If the final term falls either below or higher than the tariff, then the sentencing court should provide reasons why
the sentence is outside the range."
- As for the starting point the UK Sentencing Guidelines states that offences committed in domestic context should be regarded as being
no less serious than offences committed in a non-domestic context. Therefore the starting point should be same irrespective of whether
the parties are known to each other.
- Considering the above judicial precedents and based on an objective seriousness of offending, I select 04 months as the starting
point for your sentence.
- In UK Guidelines following are considered as aggravating factors in domestic violence cases :
- Abuse of trust and abuse of power ;
- Victim is particularly vulnerable ;
- Impact on children;
- Using contact arrangements with a child to instigate an offence ;
- A proven history of violence or threats by the offender in a domestic setting;
- history of disobedience to court orders;
- Victim forced to leave home .
- When sentencing for a domestic violence a court in Fiji can consider the above aggravating factors and any other factors that would
further aggravate the offence.
- Further the court must consider the section 4(3) of the Sentencing and Penalties Act also in domestic violence offences.
- In this case I find the breach of trust as aggravating this offence and enhances your sentence by 06 months to reach 10 months imprisonment.
- In UK Guidelines the positive good character and provocation are considered as mitigating factors.
- In mitigation you submitted the following :
- 34 years old;
- Married with 4 children;
- Farmer.
- For the above mitigating factors, I deduct 04 months to reach 06 months imprisonment.
- You are not a first offender and hence not entitle for discounts for your character.
- In UK Guilty Plea guidelines of 2007 it has been held that when an accused pleaded guilty at the first available opportunity the reduction
is 1/3 and after a trial date is set 1/4 recommended. But when an accused pleaded guilty at the door of the court or after the trial
has started he maybe entitle for only 1/10 discount.
- You pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity and for that I deduct 1/3 to reach 04 months imprisonment.
- Now I have to consider whether to suspend this sentence pursuant to section 26(2) (b) of the Sentencing and Penalties Act.
- Without any justification you assaulted your wife in the road and dragged her to home and repeated the same thing. Unfortunately this
is not the first time you have unleashed your violence on your wife. Previously also you assaulted your wife and after convicted
the court has given a fine of $100.00. It appears that you have considered the leniency shown by the court as a weakness and continue
to torment your wife. Hence time has come to denounce your behavior and deter you from committing similar offences. This means you
have to serve this 04 months imprisonment.
- For the safety of the victim, I also grant a permanent domestic violence restraining order with standard non-molestation conditions.
- 28 days to appeal.
Shageeth Somaratne
Resident Magistrate
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJMC/2017/108.html