Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Magistrates Court of Fiji |
IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
Criminal Case No: -863/2010
STATE
V
TERANCE EDWIN ANTHONY
ALVIN LATA
JANES RANJINA PRASAD
Ms. Fatiaki for the State
The 1st Accused in Person
Ms. Pretika for the 2nd and the 3rd accused
SENTENCE
Count 1
AGGRAVATED ROBBERY: contrary to Section 311(1)(a) of the Crimes Decree No. 44 of 2009.
Particulars of Offence
Terance Edwin Anthon, Alvin Lata and Janes Ranjina Prasad on the 14th day of May 2010 at Nabua in the Central Division robbed Dhirend Dutt.
Count 2
THEFT OF MOTOR VEHICLE: contrary to Section 293(1) of the Crimes Decree No. 44 of 2009.
Particulars of Offence
Terance Edwin Anthon, Alvin Lata and Janes Ranjina Prasad on the 14th day of May 2010 at Nabua in the Central Division stole a motor vehicle namely a white Toyata Caldina Taxi, registration number LT2585, the property of Sanyo Cabs.
LAW AND TARIFF
"The maximum penalty for robbery with violence under the Penal Code is life imprisonment, while the maximum penalty for aggravated robbery under the Crimes Decree is 20 years imprisonment. Although the maximum sentence under the Decree has been reduced to 20 years imprisonment, in my judgment, the tariff of 8 to 14 years imprisonment established under the old law can continue to apply under the new law. I hold this for two reasons. Firstly, the established tariff of 8 to 14 years under the old law falls below the maximum sentence of 20 years under the new law. Secondly, under the new law, aggravated robbery is made an indictable offence, triable only in the High Court, which means the Executive's intention is to treat the offence seriously".
"'Sentences for robberies iing firearms should range from six to eight years. A lower range of four to seven years is s is appropriate where firearms are not used and the premises are banks, or shops, post offices or service stations. However, the sentence may be higher where the victim or victims are particularly vulnerable due to age, infirmity, disability or where children are involved. Similarly where injuries are caused in the course of the robbery, a higher sentence will be justified. The value of the property stolen, evidence of planning or premeditation, multiple offences and previous convictions for similar offences should be considered aggravating features. The sentence may be reduced where the offender has no previous convictions, has pleaded guilty and has expressed remorse. This list of aggravating and mitigating features is by no means exhaustive. Furthermore, the sentence will always be adjusted up or down, depending on the facts of the particular case'
AGGRAVATING FACTORS
MITIGATING FACTORS
1st accused
2nd accused
3rd accused
'Much has been said of attacks on taxi dr . Thrt hurt has uded thed that the need for harsh deterrent sentences to protect taxi drivers,thnd the transportsport facility they provide for the c, faweighs the personal mitigating circumstances of u of unthinnthinking or alienated young men: Peni Raiwalui v The State (unrepo Suva. App. No. HAA030AA030.03S,.03S, 12 November 2003; Vilikesa Koroivuata v The State (unreported) Cr. App. HAA064.04S, 20 August 2004; State v Charles Marvick, (unreported) Suva Cr. Case No. HAC027.028.04S 19 October 2004".
"Violent and armed robberies of taxi drivers are all too frequent. The taxi industry serves this country well. It provides a cheap vital link in short and medium haul transport... The risk of personal harm they take every day by simply going about their business can only be ameliorated by harsh deterrent sentences that might instill in prospective muggers the knowledge that if they hurt or harm a taxi driver, they will receive a lengthy term of imprisonment".
"Violent robberies of transport providers (be they taxi, bus or van drivers) are not crimes that should result in non-custodial sentences, despite the youth or good prospects of the perpetrators...."
"The purpose of sentence that applies to the offenders is both special and general deterrence if the taxi drivers are to be protected against wanton disregard of their safety. I have not lost sight of the fact that Waisiki and P.L are first time young offenders. I bear in mind that the first time young offenders are generally given non-custodial sentences as a measure of rehabilitation. But the ultimate approach to a sentence is that the punishment must fit the crime, even if the offenders are young".
30th July 2014
H.S.P. Somaratne
Resident Magistrate, Suva
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJMC/2014/133.html