PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Fiji

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Fiji >> 2025 >> [2025] FJHC 122

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


State v Nakarawa - Sentence [2025] FJHC 122; HAC261.2022 (11 March 2025)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI AT SUVA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION


Criminal Case number: HAC 261 of 2022


STATE


-v-


MATAIASI NAKARAWA


Prosecution: Ms. Naidu, Monisha
Accused: Present with Mr. Emasi, Inoke


Date of Sentence: 11th March, 2025


SENTENCE


  1. MATAIASI NAKARAWA you are here to be sentenced after pleading guilty on your own accord to the following offence.

First Count


Statement of offence


AGGRAVATED ROBBERY: Contrary to section 311(1) (a) of the Crimes Act 2009.


Particulars of Offence


MATAIASI NAKARAWA with another on the 12th day of July, 2022 at Vatuwaqa, in the Central Division, in the company of another stole 2 x 9 carat gold chains and $100.00 cash, the properties of KRISHAN SINGH and immediately before committing theft, punched KRISHAN SINGH.


Summary of Facts


  1. You admitted to the facts read and explained to you. It is revealed that the complainant in this case is KRISHAN SINGH, employed as a Fish Middleman of 56 Wailea Settlement, Vatuwaqa. (herein known as PW1).
  2. On 12th July, 2022 at about 7.30pm, PW1 was returning from work and was on his way home. Whilst walking along Lemeki Street in Vatuwaqa, two youths approached him and robbed him.
  3. PW1 stated that whilst walking, he felt someone hit him from the back. When he turned, he saw two youths and one of them he identified as "Matai" who was the first accused (Al). PW1 saw Al and his accomplice whereby he clearly identified Al as they reside in the same neighbourhood.
  4. Al's accomplice held PW1 from behind and punched him whilst Al grabbed PW1's two x 9 carat gold chain and fled the scene. Al's accomplice took $100 from PW1's pocket and fled the scene too. As the two accused were running towards Wailea Street, he could see them clearly from the brightness of the street lights.
  5. Accused together with his accomplice robbed PW1 of his 2 x 9 carat gold chains and $100 cash and immediately before committing theft, assaulted PW1.
  6. After the incident, PW1 reported the matter at Nabua Police Station.
  7. The accused was arrested on 29th July, 2022 and was escorted to Nabua Police Station for questioning of the alleged offence of Aggravated Robbery.
  8. When the accused was interviewed under caution, he made full admissions with respect to the alleged incident. He also admitted to being present at the alleged scene together with his accomplice and prior to robbing the complainant, they assaulted him.
  9. The accused was then formally charged with one count of Aggravated Robbery contrary to 311 (1) (a) of the Crimes Act 2009.

11. The accused is a first offender.


Recording of Conviction


  1. The Court is aware that the Accused understands the implication of his plea and finds him guilty accordingly. The Accused is convicted for one count of Aggravated Robbery contrary to 311 (1) (a) of the Crimes Act 2009.

Sentencing Guidelines


  1. Prior to sentencing the accused, I have considered sections 4(1) and 4(2) of the Sentencing and Penalties Act, 2009 with regards to sentencing guidelines.

Maximum Penalty and Tariff


  1. The maximum sentence for the offence of aggravated robbery contrary to section 311(1) of the Crimes Act is 20 years imprisonment.
  2. In State v. Tawake [2022] FJSC 22; CAV 0025.2019 (28 April 2022) the starting for this offence which is on the lower range is 3 years. The sentencing range is: 1 – 5 years imprisonment.

Starting Point


  1. This court selects 3 years as a starting point.

Aggravating Factors


  1. There are no aggravating factors. This is not a pre-meditated crime but an opportunistic offence.
  2. Your sentence remains at 3 years imprisonment.

Mitigating Factors


  1. At the time of the offending, you were 18 years old. You are a first offender.
  2. You have now found employment in Sigatoka and are assisting your family in their daily needs.
  3. Based on the above factors, I reduce your sentence by 1 year and arrive at 2 years imprisonment.

Guilty Plea


  1. You only pleaded guilty on the day of the trial. I further deduct 6 months from your sentence and arrive at 1 years and 6 months imprisonment.

Sentence


  1. Mataiasi Nakarawa, you are sentenced to 1 year and 6 months imprisonment.

Period in Custody


  1. Section 24 of the Sentencing and Penalties Act, 2009 requires the court to deduct time in custody before the trial. You were remanded in custody from 1st August, 2022 until 31st October, 2022, a total of almost 3 months.
  2. I also deduct 3 months from your sentence and your final term is 1 year and 3 months imprisonment.

Suspend of not to suspend


  1. In considering section 26(2)(a) of the Sentencing and Penalties Act, 2009, this court has the power to suspend a sentence that does not exceed 3 years.
  2. I note that you are a young offender and the Court should provide you with an opportunity to reform. You must seize the opportunity to do so and become a law abiding person.
  3. Based on the above reasons, I order that your sentence of 1 year and 3 months is to be suspended.

Summary


  1. Mataiasi Nakarawa, you are sentenced to 1 year and 3 months imprisonment. However, your sentence is suspended for a period of 1 year effective forthwith.
  2. Suspended sentence is to be explained to you in your preferred language.

Appeal Period


  1. 30 days to appeal to the Fiji Court of Appeal.

...................................

Waleen M George

Acting Puisne Judge


Dated at Suva this 11th day of March, 2025.


Solicitors: Office of the Director of Public Prosecution for State

Legal Aid Commission for the Accused


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2025/122.html