![]() |
Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of Fiji |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT LAUTOKA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL CASE NO. HAC 201 OF 2023
STATE
v
KITIONE RATU
Counsel : Ms S. Naibe for Prosecution
: Mr P. Chand for Offender
Date of Sentence Hearing : 27 November 2024
Date of Sentence : 11 December 2024
SENTENCE
COUNT ONE
Statement of Offence
AGGRAVATED BURGLARY: Contrary to Section 313 (1) (a) of the Crimes Act 2009.
Particulars of Offence
KITIONE RATU, RAVIELI RATU and ISOA NASARA ROKOBARO between November 13 and November 14, 2023 at Tavua in the Western Division, entered into the dwelling house of EREMASI SAUNE as a trespasser, with intent to commit theft.
COUNT TWO
Statement of Offence
THEFT: Contrary to Section 291 (1) of the Crimes Act 2009.
Particulars of Offence KITIONE RATU, RAVIELI RATU and ISOA NASARA ROKOBARO between November 13 and November 14, 2023 at Tavua in the Western Division, dishonestly appropriated (stole) 3 x mats valued at $600.00, 1 x portable wifi valued at $100.00, 1 x PUMA black travelling bag valued at $20.00, 1 x money box valued at $3.95 and 1 x RKS t-shirt valued at $20.00, the properties of EREMASI SAUNE, with intention of permanently depriving EREMASI SAUNE of his properties.
The complainant in this matter EREMASI SAUNE (PW1), at the material time, was residing at Kavuli, Tavua.
The accused in this matter is KITIONE RATU, at the material time was 20 years old, residing at Korovou village, Tavua.
Between the 13th and 14th of November 2023, PW1 left his home to attend a family function at Rabulu village, and before leaving, he had securely locked the house and left with this family. Upon returning on 14th November 2023, PW1 noticed that his house had been broken into and certain items were missing. PWl noticed that the following items were missing from his home: - 3x mats valued at $600.00; - 1x portable WiFi valued at $100.00; - 1x PUMA black travelling bag valued at $20.00; - 1x money box valued at $3.95; - 1x RKS t-shirt valued at $20.00; All to the total value of $743.95.
The matter was reported to the police and investigations were carried out. The accused was then arrested and interviewed under caution. The accused admitted to entering PWI's house when the house was empty and stole the above-mentioned items.
The accused was later charged with one count of Aggravated Burglary contrary to section 313 (1) (a) of the Crimes Act 2009 and 1 count of Theft contrary to section 291 (1) of the Crimes Act 2009. There were partial recoveries.
Factors indicating greater harm |
Theft of/damage to property causing a significant degree of loss to the victim (whether economic, commercial, sentimental or personal
value) |
Soiling, ransacking or vandalism of property |
Restraint, detention or gratuitous degradation of the victim, which is greater than is necessary to succeed in the burglary. Occupier
or victim at home or on the premises (or returns home) while offender present |
Significant physical or psychological injury or other significant trauma to the victim beyond the normal inevitable consequence burglary. |
Violence used or threatened against victim, particularly the deadly nature of the weapon |
Context of general public disorder |
Factors indicating lesser harm |
Nothing stolen or only property of very low value to the victim (whether economic, sentimental or personal). No physical or psychological
injury or other significant trauma to the victim |
Limited damage or disturbance to property. No violence used or threatened and a weapon is not produced |
LEVEL OF HARM (CATEGORY) | BURGLARY (OFFENDER ALONE AND WITHOUT A WEAPON) | AGGRAVATED BURGLARY (OFFENDER EITHER WITH ANOTHER OR WITH A WEAPON) | AGGRAVATED BURGLARY (OFFENDER WITH ANOTHER AND WITH A WEAPON) |
HIGH | Starting Point: 05 years Sentencing Range: 03–08 years | Starting Point: 07 years Sentencing Range: 05–10 years | Starting Point: 09 years Sentencing Range: 08–12 years |
MEDIUM | Starting Point: 03 years Sentencing Range: 01–05 years | Starting Point: 05 years Sentencing Range: 03–08 years | Starting Point: 07 years Sentencing Range: 05–10 years |
LOW | Starting Point: 01 year Sentencing Range: 06 months – 03 years | Starting Point: 03 years Sentencing Range: 01–05 years | Starting Point: 05 years Sentencing Range: 03–08 years |
Factors indicating higher culpability |
Victim or premises deliberately targeted (for example, due to vulnerability or hostility based on disability, race, sexual orientation)
or victim compelled to leave their home (in particular victims of domestic violence). Child or the elderly, the sick or disabled at home (or return home) when offence committed |
A significant degree of planning, or organization or execution. Offence committed at night. |
Prolonged nature of the burglary. Repeated incursions. Offender taking a leading role. |
Equipped for burglary (for example, implements carried and/or use of vehicle) |
Member of a group or gang |
Factors indicating lower culpability |
Offence committed on impulse, with limited intrusion into property or little or no planning |
Offender exploited by others or committed or participated in the offence reluctantly as a result of coercion or intimidation (not
amounting to duress) or as a result of peer pressure |
Mental disorder or learning disability, where linked to the commission of the offence |
Summary
Aruna Aluthge
Judge
11 December 2024
At Lautoka
Solicitors:
Office of the Director of Public Prosecution for Prosecution
Legal Aid Commission for Defence
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2024/742.html