You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
High Court of Fiji >>
2022 >>
[2022] FJHC 238
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Download original PDF
Radrodro v Commissioner of Police [2022] FJHC 238; HBJ05.2021 (17 May 2022)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT LAUTOKA
CIVIL JURISDICTION
HBJ 05 of 2021
BETWEEN:
PAULA MALO RADRODRO of Lot 45 V M Pillay Road, Lautoka
APPLICANT IN PERSON
AND:
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
FIRST RESPONDENT
AND:
DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER WESTERN
SECOND RESPONDENT
Appearances: Mr. Paula Malo Radrodro – In Person
Mr. Mainavolau J. for the Defendant
Date of Hearing: 09 May 2022
Date of Ruling: 17 May 2022
R U L I N G
- On 06 April 2021, Paula Malo Radrodro filed a Notice of Motion seeking the following orders:
- (i) That the first and second Respondents apologize for the unprofessional action of their staffs in their dealings with me pursuant
to Part IV section (25), (28) of the Police Act, and Section 55 (1) (c) of the Medical and Dental Practitioners Decree 2010 (the Decree).
- (ii) That the first and second Respondent conduct an investigation on the unprofessional conduct of their staffs in relation to the
allegation and necessary action taken.
- (iii) That the Respondents be prohibited to make dealings with my blood or the science that lies within the construed patens, behavior
and molecular structure of my blood and immune that is also in my family unless I give my full consent because of the danger that
lies in the lack of knowledge.
- The application is supported by an Affidavit sworn by Mr. Radrodro on 30 March 2021.
- In his affidavit, Mr. Radrodro deposes as follows:
- (1) On the 10th of February 2021, I sustained injury on my left ankle from a cane knife that was used by my daughter Queennie Kimberly who was frustrated
because a DVRO that I had filed against her and two others. Blood was spilling out fast because the knife had severed a vein.
- (2) The Lautoka Police was called and I was taken to the Lautoka Hospital in their twin cab where I sat at the back tray due to the
injury sustained and that blood was spilling out fast and onto the tray.
- (3) At the hospital the Police Officer who had the Police Medical Report filled out the report and in one form he wrote down my particulars
correctly but in the other form he changed my address from Lot 45 V M Pillay Road to 28 V M Pillay Road. I than suspected that it
was done intentionally to detract my knowledge that the blood was mine.
- (4) I was seen by a female Doctor, by the name of Nunia Kautoga and when I told her to change my address to Lot 45 V M Pillay Road,
she told me that it was their record and she can’t change it making the document invalid.
- (5) When I was taken to be stitched up, the Doctor or so I believe, after injecting me with anesthetic pulled into the syringe my
blood. There were two of them whom I believe to be Indo Fijians, a male and a female. I grew more suspicious when I saw this. After
the treatment I went home at about 4.00am.
- (6) The Police came home at 6.00am and took my statement about the knifing and I also told them about my particulars being wrong in
the medical report with the Doctors.
- (7) On the 11th, 12th, 13th, 20th planes were coming into Nadi Airport and out. Those that I saw were coming and going from the direction in the direction that planes
from America took because it usually passes over our house because of the beacon situated nearby and I knew that they were taking
my blood.
- (8) Why my blood? I am an inventor and I have already registered for patent three inventions, namely, global warming thesis, cancer
treatment called trans-med, cancer medication called chrofilicyl.
- (9) Because of COVID-19, I made an immunization for me and my family to protect us from the virus. The way it works is quite different
from conventional ones and because I have not told anyone of how it is done, my blood was sold to make the vaccine. I had
told officers at the Lautoka Police Station about my blood and members of my families blood stolen for COVID-19 vaccine.
(10) I went to the Kamikamica Park dispensary for daily dressing and I refused two shots of penicillin because I suspected that my
blood was also extracted this way.
(11) On the 21st of February 2021, the Nurse and the Doctor at the Kamikamica Park Health Center tried to force me to have the injection and when
I refused they chased me out and called the Security.
(12) The other Nurses who had dressed my wound did not object when I refused the injection.
(13) I believe that a woman was the culprit instigating the theft of my invention and my blood and the woman claims to be my wife.
(14) This was also reported to the Police.
- On 07 March 2022, the Office of the Attorney General filed on Inter-Partes Summons to Strike Out pursuant to Order 18 Rule 18 (i)
(a) of the High Court Rules. On the ground that Mr. Radrodro’s application discloses no reasonable cause of action.
- Mr. Radrodro has filed an Affidavit in Response sworn on 11 April 2022. He deposes as follows:
- (1) I, Paula Malo Radrodro of Lot 45 V M Pillay Road Lautoka, the above named Applicant, am duly authorized to make this affidavit
save as hereafter appears I do of mine own knowledge.
- (2) I would like to reiterate the facts that on the 10th of February 2021 at 10pm or thereabouts, I was injured by my daughter who had deliberately cut my ankle with a cane knife at our
home at Lot 45 V M Pillay Road Lautoka.
- (3) The Lautoka Police was called and she was arrested and I was taken to the Lautoka Hospital for medical treatment.
- (4) That while I was being treated for my injury, the hospital personals after injecting me with anesthetic drew my blood into the
syringe and that was when I got suspicious that they were trying to take my blood for COVID-19 treatment.
- (5) I was even more suspicious when I saw that my address was changed by the Police Officer on my Police Medical Reports a copy of
which was kept by the Doctor which had my address changed and another was taken by the Police to be produced as evidence in criminal
case between the State and Queenie.
- (6) That after the 10th of February 2021, aeroplanes started coming in and out of Fiji and COVID-19 patient was being released from hospital.
- (7) I therefore seek further orders that the Respondents produced the medical reports of which one had my address changed to be produced
as evidence pursuant to Order 24, R2 (5) (a) and any other orders that the Court deem fit.
- At the hearing before me, Mr. Mainavolau submitted as follows:
- (i) the originating process filed by Mr. Radrodro is a judicial review application.
- (ii) the application does not comply with Order 53 Rule 3.
- (iii) there is no specific decision identified in the documents filed to be reviewed by the Court.
- Mr. Radrodro in Court submitted as follows:
I had filed similar action before Justice Nanayakkara, and it was the same situation that we are going through now. The format is
incorrect, and I was told to file a Judicial Review so that I can have orders. In here I am seeking orders my Lord. The action that
was filed before Nanayakarra was against the Commissioner
of Police and on the same basis of allegations where the Police at the Lautoka Police Station was had breached duty. And in this
action my Lord, the Police had breached their duty. They had altered very important information regarding me and where I live. And
as far as the allegation of blood being used for COVID-19 vaccine, I can remember that before the Astrazenaca vaccine was introduced
into Fiji in 2021 around about March or April, or in between March and April. There was nothing that had come up until I got hurt.
The only people that had vaccine already developed was Pfizer vaccine. Now Pfizer vaccine was developed around about in December
2020 to January 2021. Now I had an allegation where my grandson was cut on the hands, and blood was taken. I had reported the matter
to the Police and that is why the DVRO was given /issued to my daughter. That made her angry and she cut my leg. Now the Kamikamica
Hospital, in 2020 the Kamikamica Park/Hospital had already known that I had already developed an immunization. It’s not a vaccine.
Well what everybody is getting is not a vaccine. Vaccine is a hundred years. Polio vaccine is a hundred years in length. Now the
vaccine that you were shot with, it only lasted few months and then you had to receive boosters and again another booster. That is
not what a vaccine is all about. Now my immunization is a hundred years. Now they took my blood and how they developed that vaccine,
they cultured the blood, made it plenty, weakening its strength and that is why the vaccine is happening that way. You know and they
can’t do anything about it. You will have to receive boosters. Anything comes up booster. Anything comes up booster, now you
don’t call that vaccine. Now it is because they stole the blood but they never got the signs. And that is why you had received
your almost four boosters.
Judge: Can I just go back a little? How did your grandson get hurt?
Mr. Radrodro: My grandson’s father was the one who had cut his hand. And I had got a DVRO out. We reported the matter.
Judge: So the father cut him but you reported DVRO against the mother?
Mr. Radrodro: The mother, the father!
- After considering all, I must agree with Mr. Mainavolau. The application by Mr. Radrodro is dismissed. Costs against the Applicant
which I summarily assess at $350.00 (Three Hundred and Fifty Dollars Only).
Anare Tuilevuka
JUDGE
Lautoka
17 May 2022
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2022/238.html